If thats true, we must have another striker in the pipeline.
Otherwise that'll only leave us with two real striking options: Torres and Sturridge.
Torres is liable to have a crisis of confidence at moment and Sturridge I'm not convinced its his best position.
Mind you, we might try Spain's 4-6-0 formation. We certainly have enough quality midfielders for it.
Whats your source of information then 1L?
SkySpors reported it about an hour ago, just said the clubs have agreed a deal to loan lukaku for a season and just sorting out the wage terms etc
Sending a 19 year old on loan? His careen must be over with us.
Stretty
It's £12 million so far Stretty
I think this is a good loan. Like you I do think Lukaku could be a real success story at Fulham and probably come back next season pushing for a starting place. Dempsey is probably leaving, and Petric and Ruiz more likely to he used on the wing, leaving Rodalegga a competition up front
Think this might be a mistake you know. After the lack of help given to Kakuta and McEachran, we better be damn sure Fulham are gunna make him their target man.
And it can only mean another striker is in the pipeline, which again i think might be a mistake.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/14432798
=====================
20
Plus chelsea cant bringing through talented young players anyway so his chances are slim to none.
Stick to ready made players, what you lot are good at
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
It'd be better for his development for him to be starting on loan than be 3rd choice at Chelsea. Loving Chelsea shouldn't mean you sacrifice a players development.
TP I'm pretty confident he'd start for them if Demosey goes, and Jol likes physical strikers
I hope so. In this new vision of ours, Lukaku could grow into becoming one of it's most critical components. Wasting his time is wasting our money.
I think Lukaku has a better chance of playing at Fulham than if he stays.
He might even become a pivotal part of Fulham´s attack which would be excellent as he needs PL experience and we need to see how good he is.
Lukaku will only improve if he plays. He needs to work on a lot of things in his game including his first touch and hopefully he will get that at Fulham.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Lukaku to be loaned to Fulham
Page 1 of 1
posted on 22/7/12
If thats true, we must have another striker in the pipeline.
Otherwise that'll only leave us with two real striking options: Torres and Sturridge.
Torres is liable to have a crisis of confidence at moment and Sturridge I'm not convinced its his best position.
Mind you, we might try Spain's 4-6-0 formation. We certainly have enough quality midfielders for it.
posted on 22/7/12
Whats your source of information then 1L?
posted on 22/7/12
SkySpors reported it about an hour ago, just said the clubs have agreed a deal to loan lukaku for a season and just sorting out the wage terms etc
posted on 22/7/12
20 Mil well spent then
posted on 22/7/12
13
posted on 22/7/12
£18m
posted on 22/7/12
Sending a 19 year old on loan? His careen must be over with us.
Stretty
posted on 22/7/12
Career *
*
posted on 22/7/12
It's £12 million so far Stretty
I think this is a good loan. Like you I do think Lukaku could be a real success story at Fulham and probably come back next season pushing for a starting place. Dempsey is probably leaving, and Petric and Ruiz more likely to he used on the wing, leaving Rodalegga a competition up front
posted on 22/7/12
Think this might be a mistake you know. After the lack of help given to Kakuta and McEachran, we better be damn sure Fulham are gunna make him their target man.
And it can only mean another striker is in the pipeline, which again i think might be a mistake.
posted on 22/7/12
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/14432798
=====================
20
Plus chelsea cant bringing through talented young players anyway so his chances are slim to none.
Stick to ready made players, what you lot are good at
posted on 22/7/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 22/7/12
It'd be better for his development for him to be starting on loan than be 3rd choice at Chelsea. Loving Chelsea shouldn't mean you sacrifice a players development.
TP I'm pretty confident he'd start for them if Demosey goes, and Jol likes physical strikers
posted on 22/7/12
I hope so. In this new vision of ours, Lukaku could grow into becoming one of it's most critical components. Wasting his time is wasting our money.
posted on 22/7/12
I think Lukaku has a better chance of playing at Fulham than if he stays.
He might even become a pivotal part of Fulham´s attack which would be excellent as he needs PL experience and we need to see how good he is.
Lukaku will only improve if he plays. He needs to work on a lot of things in his game including his first touch and hopefully he will get that at Fulham.
Page 1 of 1