or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 106 comments are related to an article called:

Forest takeover not as it seems.

Page 3 of 5

posted on 22/7/12

Here he is 666,

I'm sorry to say this but your like the sad kid at School who was taller and bigger than the rest of the boys at 8 years old, and was labelled a good footballer, unfortunately the rest of the kids grew up and left you behind and now all you have left is your stories of once being the School Football Captain.

Years ago you once won Poster of the Year when nobody really cared and every day you still pat yourself on the back about it. Get over yourself 666, if the same vote where to take place today nobody would even remember your name.

Sorry me old mate.



comment by sutton (U3208)

posted on 22/7/12

I think it's a bit early to making these assumptions based on very little.

I admit theres slight cause for concern. But at this stage it's no more than that. Remember just because you really want something to be true, doesn't mean it is.

comment by OOE (U3473)

posted on 22/7/12

comment by Super_BillyDavies' (U6336)




posted 19 minutes ago



Oh sorry one eye, i didn't realize you were the personal accountant for Nottingham Forest, would you be able to tell us all how much we will be spending in this transfer market, seeing as you have all this information readily available to you?

__________________________________________

My guess is - buggerall.

posted on 22/7/12

That story is a load of rubbish, but I'd be more concerned about what a agent tweeted last night.
A Nottingham Forest fan as well this agent is.
Claiming the money that's to be spent is nowhere near what's been touted in the media

posted on 22/7/12

Bit more than "slight" cause for concern, you have no back 4 and a bunch of Arrabs in trials for the places.



comment by sutton (U3208)

posted on 22/7/12

Bit more than "slight" cause for concern, you have no back 4 and a bunch of Arrabs in trials for the places.
________

We have no back 4 and some Arabs on trial. Not the same thing. But we've only had a manager a couple of days. You can't sign a back four in that time. Time yet.

Bags of time

comment by Hoons (U5327)

posted on 22/7/12

Colbi ... if you are as old as your name suggests (born in '78?) then you really should have a look in the mirror and try to work out where it all went wrong. You come across like an absolute tool, certainly not befitting of someone in their 30's. You should be embarrassed, no doubt just like your parents are

posted on 22/7/12

Bye bye, OOE.

Another derby WUM sent packing.

posted on 22/7/12

Hoons,

Thanks for the endorsement Hoons, It makes me feel good. It's always nice to get the opposition against you as it proves your doing something right.

Thanks again.

I'll be you didn't realise you were being a real help when you set out to write that post!



Wish all Forest fans were as helpful as you.





comment by TEG. (U15242)

posted on 22/7/12

comment by 666, indisputably so (U11795)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
Comment deleted by Article Creator
---------------------------------------------
Don't know what you put 666 but "Comment deleted by Article Creator" shows what everyone already knows about you and Colbi

comment by TEG. (U15242)

posted on 22/7/12

Serious question Eddiie, why do YOU think they have BOUGHT Forest, cos by your lots own admission it's not asset stripping

comment by OOE (U3473)

posted on 22/7/12

TEG:

I really don't know. Ego trip?

posted on 22/7/12

Thanks for the endorcement J.C. / True English Gentleman / TEG.

666 has tried twice in the last 2 days to stage some sort on mini-peasant-protest featuring himself and a couple of Forest Fans.

Its rather sad when he has to turn to the opposition because its his only hope of trying to gain a few points back.

Like all peasant protests, it was easily broken up and he now sits in a dungeon with the other peasants peeling potatoes and blaming each other.




comment by TEG. (U15242)

posted on 22/7/12

comment by Old One-Eye (U3473)
posted 46 seconds ago
TEG:

I really don't know. Ego trip?
-----------------------------------------
How does it boost their ego though?

I know your lot's only hope this season is our failure so for the next few weeks I'm happy for you to live in that hope

posted on 22/7/12

Why do people buy football clubs? A good question. If you look at football club chairmen a disproportionate number have been involved in criminal activity or close to criminal activity. Money laundering cannot be ruled out as a reason, The FAs fit and proper person qualification is a joke. If they enforced it around 50% of chairmen would have to resign.

Some like the indolent megarich at Man City seem to want bask in the glory so it is probably ego.

Our lot being from the US bought us to make money and have had four years of disappointment. The Glazers though seem to have found a way of doing it by transferring their debts to the club and then using Man U as their personal piggy bank.

Moral is never trust a football club owner. They are more than likely dishonest in some way.

comment by TEG. (U15242)

posted on 22/7/12

Colbi, 666 doesn't turn to us lot, he's no need to. Dirty sheep or not it's not hard to see you rfurry forehead sticking out of his pocket duck

posted on 22/7/12

That made sense TEG.




Definitely one of your best posts.




comment by OOE (U3473)

posted on 22/7/12

"I know your lot's only hope this season is our failure so for the next few weeks I'm happy for you to live in that hope"

TEG - in your exile, we have had a bunch of illiterate Nothingham cretins giving it large with the old 'Man Shiteh of the Midlands' bullcrap.

Now it transpires that every single eligible manager with any credentials whatsoever has steered a very wide course - those offered the job have turned it down flat aln any other manager worth his salt has either been washing his hair or had to take the dog for a walk.

Basically, it ALMOST looks as though a bunch of Kuwaiti refrigerator salesmen have seized the opportunity to widen their horizons somewhat - perhaps they see the possibility of picking up the East Midlands 'Iceland' contract - or just possibly, they see themselves as the saviours of a once-famous, now existing in the doldrums, football club.

Only time will tell. There's as much 'evidence' that they are a bunch of opportunists as they are are a group of philanthropists.

comment by TEG. (U15242)

posted on 22/7/12

Colbi have you also been SuperNotts, Merry Forest Fan and Colinateallthe pies on these boards?



posted on 22/7/12

Well...Let's hope there's not a uprising of the populace in Kuwait against dubious money men...

posted on 22/7/12

No Teg.

You will notice my style of posting as it can't be copied nor bettered. It would be impossible for me to disguise myself.

I'm very much like yourself in terms of being easy to spot, with you being the polar opposite to me in terms of you being thick and stupid.

I'm now off for a walk down the beach and a quick pint looking over the sea.


You Forest Fans mind out for the crack-heads.


Night.


Love you all.




posted on 22/7/12

Colbi_1978 = Mapread on Mkat

comment by TEG. (U15242)

posted on 22/7/12

TEG - in your exile, we have had a bunch of illiterate Nothingham cretins giving it large with the old 'Man Shiteh of the Midlands' bullcrap.
-----------------------------------------------------------
I agree Eddiie but you are going to get them at every club. We are never going to be the Man City of the midlands, we heard the same from the Leicester lot and we would hear it from some of you lot (and did when you're billionaires took over)


Now it transpires that every single eligible manager with any credentials whatsoever has steered a very wide course - those offered the job have turned it down flat aln any other manager worth his salt has either been washing his hair or had to take the dog for a walk.
-------------------------------------------------
You've nothing solid to base this on. Our owners said they would be speaking to some "iconic" names (which in fairness we would class Ferguson, Wenger, Mourinho etc as iconic) and selecting the one that knows this league. There's no REAL evidence that any have turned us down. I know it's easy to say now but apart from perhaps Redknapp (who was never a realistic target) I prefer SO'D to any of them mentioned for various reasons. We have a man here that knows this league, has a lot of respect in the game (even though granted not seen as "iconic", plays football the right way and will never be seen on tele slating the players. A manager that will never think he's bigger than the club or the players and no media hype surrounding him. To me he's a brilliant choice for manager

Basically, it ALMOST looks as though a bunch of Kuwaiti refrigerator salesmen have seized the opportunity to widen their horizons somewhat - perhaps they see the possibility of picking up the East Midlands 'Iceland' contract - or just possibly, they see themselves as the saviours of a once-famous, now existing in the doldrums, football club.
----------------------------------------------
How much of an "ego boost" would it be to take this "once-famous" (no arguments from me) club back to the PL? It's certainly not about money/asset stripping with this lot

Only time will tell. There's as much 'evidence' that they are a bunch of opportunists as they are are a group of philanthropists.
----------------------------------------------------
There's no evidence whatsoever, you live in hope and yes you're right time will tell. Until then keep clutching at straws

comment by TEG. (U15242)

posted on 22/7/12

comment by Colbi_1978 (U11805)
posted 7 minutes ago
No Teg.

You will notice my style of posting as it can't be copied nor bettered. It would be impossible for me to disguise myself.
----------------------------------------------
Well supernotts, merry forest fan and colin seem to manage it

I'm very much like yourself in terms of being easy to spot, with you being the polar opposite to me in terms of you being thick and stupid.
--------------------------------------------------------
Couldn't agree more cos you don't get any thicker and more stupid than you.

posted on 22/7/12

My post simply asked why the commentwhore Colbi decided to take his comment from someone else's article on this subject and publish it himself as an article, and why you lot get his rocks off by responding when quite clearly he is incapable of either holding a discussion or even understanding that which is spelled out for him multiple times?

He's quite clearly a ragingtwat and yet still your lot respond as he sits knocking one out as the comment numbers rise.

Baffling.

Page 3 of 5

Sign in if you want to comment