or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 20 comments are related to an article called:

Besiktas Close To Signing Chamakh

Page 1 of 1

posted on 30/7/12

hopefully not

posted on 30/7/12

goal.com

posted on 30/7/12

hope so

posted on 30/7/12

In financial trouble but want to sign a £70,000 pw player??

Ya right!

posted on 30/7/12

chamakh is a good player.

posted on 30/7/12

Goal.com

posted on 30/7/12

I know it isn't true but I'm going to get excited about it anyway.

posted on 30/7/12

http://news.arseblog.com/2012/07/besiktas-chamakh-is-on-our-shopping-list/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook

comment by Gonz (U14753)

posted on 30/7/12

Let put our hands together people, and pray.

I hope he moves on.

posted on 30/7/12

at 70k a weeek, I'm sorry but he is not going anywhere.
Especially not Besiktas
I'm sure they don't know about his wages.

Remember Fiorentina? See how fast they ran when they heard his wages?
The French clubs can't even touch him cos he has "tasted" the salaries in England.

He will see out his contract like Almunia

comment by Gonz (U14753)

posted on 30/7/12

StuFeez, is right, cant see it happening, unless we let him go on a free.

The 70k wage was because we got him on a free, so yeah, cant see him geting 70k anywhere else.

posted on 30/7/12

Its amazing how positive we can feel if we can rid of 'hangers on'. Chamakh is on £70k a week. In addition to a signing on bonus of 5m euros so we can hardly call him 'free'.

When Chamakh is £70k a week, Arshavin on £90k a week. £55k a week to Bendtner. So much money for complete rubbish!

posted on 30/7/12

Not to mention Squillaci...

comment by Gonz (U14753)

posted on 30/7/12

Its amazing how positive we can feel if we can rid of 'hangers on'. Chamakh is on £70k a week. In addition to a signing on bonus of 5m euros so we can hardly call him 'free'.

When Chamakh is £70k a week, Arshavin on £90k a week. £55k a week to Bendtner. So much money for complete rubbish!

----

free in a sense of the contract, appreciate the bonuses etc etc, and if he was decent and continued his start form, it would have been good value.

It could be worse, we could have paid 35m for him?

comment by Gonz (U14753)

posted on 30/7/12

Not to mention Squillaci...

----

Djouru and Denilison, all on good money I hear.

posted on 30/7/12

t could be worse, we could have paid 35m for him?
---------------------------------------

Spend £35m at Arsenal?

Hill-Wood may spend £35m on a new house. £35m on a single player? Never!

Most £35m players cost that much because there is less risk on their performance. You have to be either very stupid (Fergie) or don't care (Man City and Chelsea) to buy players who are considered a risk for £35m.

comment by Gonz (U14753)

posted on 30/7/12

Spend £35m at Arsenal?

Hill-Wood may spend £35m on a new house. £35m on a single player? Never!

Most £35m players cost that much because there is less risk on their performance. You have to be either very stupid (Fergie) or don't care (Man City and Chelsea) to buy players who are considered a risk for £35m.

------
I dont know, Liverpool pulled it off with a cracker of a signing.

posted on 30/7/12

Chamakh is not on £70k/w. Whoever came out with that made it up.

comment by Gonz (U14753)

posted on 31/7/12

Chamakh is not on £70k/w. Whoever came out with that made it up.

------------
I heard it was 60k from around when he signed. so
70k isnt far off

comment by (U5799)

posted on 31/7/12

Let's be honest the club is not particularly clever in negotiating players' contracts.

We allow contracts to run down to one year in the case
of our most saleable players eg Van Persie,Walcott and Nasri.

We pay inflated wages to second string squad players
such as Denilson,Squillaci, Djourou,Chamakh,
Bendtner and Park. The end product is that they are
virtually unsaleable.

Page 1 of 1

Sign in if you want to comment