or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 105 comments are related to an article called:

Last three seasons including this

Page 5 of 5

posted on 25/8/12

Sandy,
How about actually contributing to your article instead of piggy backing other posters, or maybe just admit your out of your depth with regards to FFP and we can all leave it there.

posted on 25/8/12

Fat Ron's.................................................Chelsea do not generate more disposable income than Spurs, because of your expenditure.

FFP is actually designed to try & make the playing field a bit more level by curbing clubs like PSG, Chelsea & City just handing out massive amounts of money on players.

It is not not designed to prevent the Pompey situation..........................and the Ranger's one was illegal & innapropriate use of funds & movement of money which brings us nicely back to some sponsorship deals I think!

posted on 25/8/12

Fat Ron....................................Running up debts is easy if you have illegally appropriated money & an owner who does not like to play by normal rules!

posted on 25/8/12

This illegal sponsor crap is getting really boring now

If you think it's illegitimate so be it but at the end of the day it doesn't matter what you think it's what UEFA think and they're hardly going to think much wrong about a company that sponsors them theirselves

posted on 25/8/12

FFP is actually designed to try & make the playing field a bit more level by curbing clubs like PSG, Chelsea & City just handing out massive amounts of money on players.



But it doesn't make it a level playing field when
1) Our revenue is higher than yours and is ever increasing

and

2)The champions league becomes an even more elusive pot gold putting us way above the rest and making it even hard for other clubs not involved to catch us up

Page 5 of 5

Sign in if you want to comment