comment by FuzzyAlli (U6468)
posted 9 minutes ago
Thought Eriksen had a stinker
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not as bad as Alli or Kane

comment by ツ Hєиgy (U9129)
posted 53 seconds ago
comment by FuzzyAlli (U6468)
posted 9 minutes ago
Thought Eriksen had a stinker
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not as bad as Alli or Kane
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would start Jansen and drop Kane.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Agreed Fuzzyalli m, give Kane some rest. Break him into the season over the first 5/6 games he always starts slowly!

Janssen keep impressing me. After he came on things were happening and his runs were stretching their defense. if only Stekelenburg didn't pull that worldclass save.

Kane hasn't had a decent rest in 2 years now

comment by OneHopefulFan #Spurs (U8366)
posted 1 hour, 54 minutes ago
comment by Chronic (U3423)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by grandspurs (U3810)
posted 58 seconds ago
Thought Eriksen had a stinker
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

I forget the last time he had a good game tbh. He is a luxury and when you have to dig in and show some balls he is always found lacking
----------------------------------------------------------------------
he wants a big pay rise though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
mr i never believe the papers is all over them now because it is slating eriksen. remind me when eriksen personally told you he wants this
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Ok then. I will let him off the supposedly wanting a wage increase. I will just criticise him for his shyyyyyte display in isolation instead

Do I have your permission?

comment by grandspurs (U3810)
posted 23 hours, 53 minutes ago
On a serious note you looked a right idiot
----------------------------------------------------------------------

On a more serious note, if that useless plank weren't playing in the first place we probably wouldn't have been losing in the first place. More points dropped due to playing with a weak link.

comment by Chicken_ (U1043)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by grandspurs (U3810)
posted 23 hours, 53 minutes ago
On a serious note you looked a right idiot
----------------------------------------------------------------------

On a more serious note, if that useless plank weren't playing in the first place we probably wouldn't have been losing in the first place. More points dropped due to playing with a weak link.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Interesting that out of the 10,000 the voted yesterday, Lamela was voted MOTM with 75% of votes. Surely it's much more likely that you, the minority, are wrong and the majority are right

comment by Christopher - Sorry but I'm still not RRP (U20930)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Chicken_ (U1043)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by grandspurs (U3810)
posted 23 hours, 53 minutes ago
On a serious note you looked a right idiot
----------------------------------------------------------------------

On a more serious note, if that useless plank weren't playing in the first place we probably wouldn't have been losing in the first place. More points dropped due to playing with a weak link.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Interesting that out of the 10,000 the voted yesterday, Lamela was voted MOTM with 75% of votes. Surely it's much more likely that you, the minority, are wrong and the majority are right
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Do you think Lamela played well?

In every paper I've read Lamela got 6/10, so maybe I'm not actually in the minority after all. Especially baring in mind that 10,000 is not actually a big pool of people in the grand scheme of things.

Good goal - yes - but totally useless for rest of game.

Massive weak link. Costs us so many points. Lessons still not been learned.

10,000 is statistically a more than acceptable population to base a survey on.

Lamela could have scored a goal a minute and you'd still criticise because a) you get a kick out of trying to WUM you're own teams fans, b) you're too facking stubborn to admit you're wrong about him, c) you're a facking imbecile

You bored everyone on the match threads shiiiteless with your inane bollox last season and seem intent to start again this time round. I would be more than happy to see you banned off there as it would save me the hassle of filtering you.

Everyone is entitled to an opinion, but you insist on rammng yours down everyone's throats week after fackin week. Just do one...thanks

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3738963/Everton-1-1-Tottenham-Erik-Lamela-earns-point-Spurs-Ross-Barkley-s-free-kick-opener.html

Lamela 7.5

http://www.skysports.com/football/everton-vs-tottenham/report/356340

Lamela 7

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/football/537674/Tottenham-Player-Ratings-Harry-Kane-Everton-sportgalleries

Lamela 7

So a quick Google search ( don't read papers ) and first 3 hits have him 7 or above. I'm sure if I carried on the theme would be the same.

Think you're incredibly harsh on him especially when the likes of Kane Alli and Eriksen was a lot worse yet seen no criticism about them.

Will now ignore you and this thing you've got with Lamela.

comment by Vertonghen Groove *100% WUM free* (U1546)
posted 2 hours, 9 minutes ago
10,000 is statistically a more than acceptable population to base a survey on.

Lamela could have scored a goal a minute
----------------------------------------------------------------------

He could have - but he didn't. Instead, he mis-placed every pass, cost us possession & was the worst player on the pitch AGAIN.

He grabbed a good goal but we would have been in a better position had he not been on the pitch - for sure.

And throwing insults shows you lost this debate before it begun.

"he mis-placed every pass"

34 successful passes
11 unsuccessful passes

1 in 3 mis-placed is not a good state.

Stat

In fact it's shocking

This is why we are drawing too many.

Very poor player.

Poor passing. Poor player.

So you statement off mis placing every pass is incorrect?

comment by ツ Hєиgy (U9129)
posted 2 minutes ago
So you statement off mis placing every pass is incorrect?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You just backed it up for me.

No further questions yer honour.

Lamela - goal & MoM

There was never a debate to be had Chicken, I was stating my opinion, and that of many others on here, of you as a poster.

You also stated he misplaced every pass, Hengy proved that to be as way off the mark as your 'every paper I read had him at a 6'

I can only conclude you're scraping the bottom of the barrel to come up with reasons for your irrational hatred and hoping nobody proves you wrong. Unfortunately it doesn't take much to spot you're making it up as you go along.

Keep up the WUMs if you wish, but your audience will continue to dwindle until you're as irrelevant as your opinions.