comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted less than a minute ago
We were robbed - no doubt about it and VAR didn't even ask the ref to review that decision as it has done many a times against us
Ref bottled that decision big time. It was clearly Silva diving and yet he gave it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Should it be a second yellow for simulation as well
Bergwijn 2 minutes before that had a handd in his back and ref didnt give it so why disallow kanes goal
comment by Heung Min Sonic Boom (U21170)
posted 1 second ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted less than a minute ago
We were robbed - no doubt about it and VAR didn't even ask the ref to review that decision as it has done many a times against us
Ref bottled that decision big time. It was clearly Silva diving and yet he gave it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Should it be a second yellow for simulation as well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe why they didn't give it...Good point
Chelsea have hardly created a clear cut chance, even though they have had a lot of the ball down the right. Spurs have defended the crosses OK. I fancy Spurs to at least create a few chances 2nd half.
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 25 seconds ago
Japh off please Antonio
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Expecting Emerson to emerge....Conte isn't daft
really soft but looking at it again I agree that is a foul by kane
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Stevie been our best player
The worry is with moments like that Kane goal, they're usually made more crucial by the end result, so I wouldn't be surprised if Chelsea won it.
Don't worry guys... we got this.
comment by Ace (U22467)
posted 41 seconds ago
Pundits celebrating the disallowing of the goal. Jamie Redshirt hates us coz we sacked old Gravity Chops, JFH is a Chelsea man and Keane is always taking the Michael out of us. Don’t expect any impartiality in the analysis today.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sky and the guests are anti old top 4.
Kane certainly looks back on it. With the saints goal that should be 6 in 6. Some clinical finishes in there too.
really like the look of bergwijn and just imagine if we had traore bombing on down the right hand side
Don't think anyone has played too badly, though there have been a couple of shiiity passes made during counterattacks. I think one or both were Davies.
There was the exact copy of that Kane/Silva incident with Mason and Bergwijn with Mason pushing Bergwinj but that was not given by ref?
comment by burghandy (U10383)
posted 46 seconds ago
really like the look of bergwijn and just imagine if we had traore bombing on down the right hand side
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chelsea would probably have had another 5 throw ins from his crosses
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 5 minutes ago
Japh off please Antonio
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This, he will get himself sent off
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Heung Min Sonic Boom (U21170)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted less than a minute ago
Watching through a foreign stream so hard to tell but why was the Kane goal disallowed?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He tickled Silva which is a massive no no at the bridge
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah it looked like hardly and contact. Thought it was originally because our player was down on the floor.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
same
comment by burghandy (U10383)
posted 2 minutes ago
really like the look of bergwijn and just imagine if we had traore bombing on down the right hand side
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not in games like this
I do think the Kane goal was soft and bit of 50/50
Facking annoying though
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 1 minute ago
There was the exact copy of that Kane/Silva incident with Mason and Bergwijn with Mason pushing Bergwinj but that was not given by ref?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You mean Tanganga? Yep same thing. Kane's was even less of a push than that one.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Sign in if you want to comment
The Tottenham Match Day Thread.
Page 9584 of 12288
9585 | 9586 | 9587 | 9588 | 9589
posted on 23/1/22
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted less than a minute ago
We were robbed - no doubt about it and VAR didn't even ask the ref to review that decision as it has done many a times against us
Ref bottled that decision big time. It was clearly Silva diving and yet he gave it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Should it be a second yellow for simulation as well
posted on 23/1/22
Bergwijn 2 minutes before that had a handd in his back and ref didnt give it so why disallow kanes goal
posted on 23/1/22
Japh off please Antonio
posted on 23/1/22
comment by Heung Min Sonic Boom (U21170)
posted 1 second ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted less than a minute ago
We were robbed - no doubt about it and VAR didn't even ask the ref to review that decision as it has done many a times against us
Ref bottled that decision big time. It was clearly Silva diving and yet he gave it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Should it be a second yellow for simulation as well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe why they didn't give it...Good point
posted on 23/1/22
Chelsea have hardly created a clear cut chance, even though they have had a lot of the ball down the right. Spurs have defended the crosses OK. I fancy Spurs to at least create a few chances 2nd half.
posted on 23/1/22
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 25 seconds ago
Japh off please Antonio
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Expecting Emerson to emerge....Conte isn't daft
posted on 23/1/22
really soft but looking at it again I agree that is a foul by kane
posted on 23/1/22
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 23/1/22
Stevie been our best player
posted on 23/1/22
The worry is with moments like that Kane goal, they're usually made more crucial by the end result, so I wouldn't be surprised if Chelsea won it.
posted on 23/1/22
Don't worry guys... we got this.
posted on 23/1/22
comment by Ace (U22467)
posted 41 seconds ago
Pundits celebrating the disallowing of the goal. Jamie Redshirt hates us coz we sacked old Gravity Chops, JFH is a Chelsea man and Keane is always taking the Michael out of us. Don’t expect any impartiality in the analysis today.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sky and the guests are anti old top 4.
posted on 23/1/22
Kane certainly looks back on it. With the saints goal that should be 6 in 6. Some clinical finishes in there too.
posted on 23/1/22
really like the look of bergwijn and just imagine if we had traore bombing on down the right hand side
posted on 23/1/22
Don't think anyone has played too badly, though there have been a couple of shiiity passes made during counterattacks. I think one or both were Davies.
posted on 23/1/22
There was the exact copy of that Kane/Silva incident with Mason and Bergwijn with Mason pushing Bergwinj but that was not given by ref?
posted on 23/1/22
comment by burghandy (U10383)
posted 46 seconds ago
really like the look of bergwijn and just imagine if we had traore bombing on down the right hand side
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chelsea would probably have had another 5 throw ins from his crosses
posted on 23/1/22
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 5 minutes ago
Japh off please Antonio
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This, he will get himself sent off
posted on 23/1/22
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Heung Min Sonic Boom (U21170)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted less than a minute ago
Watching through a foreign stream so hard to tell but why was the Kane goal disallowed?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He tickled Silva which is a massive no no at the bridge
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah it looked like hardly and contact. Thought it was originally because our player was down on the floor.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
same
posted on 23/1/22
comment by burghandy (U10383)
posted 2 minutes ago
really like the look of bergwijn and just imagine if we had traore bombing on down the right hand side
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not in games like this
posted on 23/1/22
I do think the Kane goal was soft and bit of 50/50
Facking annoying though
posted on 23/1/22
Coys
posted on 23/1/22
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 1 minute ago
There was the exact copy of that Kane/Silva incident with Mason and Bergwijn with Mason pushing Bergwinj but that was not given by ref?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You mean Tanganga? Yep same thing. Kane's was even less of a push than that one.
posted on 23/1/22
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 23/1/22
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Page 9584 of 12288
9585 | 9586 | 9587 | 9588 | 9589