I'd have him for 15m if he took a massive pay cut.
No,
Would not have him back.
His attitude in the final 12 months was almost as poor as his form.
He has been playing terribly for 2 and a half years now so why would we fork out 25million for that?
Yes i know torres as been terrible for chelsea but they dont play the same way we do
....................................................................
So, a team that creates less chances for him to miss is a better team for him to play in????
STOP ALL THESE TORRES RUBBISH
Driving me
you would be better of signing Walcott and Huntelaar imo
We won;t get the Hunter. He is being courted by some of Europe's best teams. Why would he come to us in the nbottom half of our league and not in the champions league.
So you seriously think we might sign Torres AND Huntelaar AND someone like Erikson.
I hope for your sake you are under 16 and/or drunk.
man from del monte chelsea's supporting 3 shoot more than assist as liverpool's supporting 3 assist rather than shoot thats my opionon chelsea have more midfielders score for them than we do must tell you something
righteous - i want us to sign a striker 'Hunterlaar' a creative midfielder LIKE erikson and i asked if there was any turth in torres talk
Ha ha, you lot make me laugh. I know Torres has been absolutely rubbish since leaving you boys but why would he come back to you lot now in the shape you are in, he left you lot to win things.
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Have some commas.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Unless he wants to half his wages to 80k then you can forget this pipe dream of a Torres return.
No, because Torres isn't a £25,000,000 striker. £15,000,000 and yes I'd take him back and I think he could do a job. But he isn't a 30 goal a season striker any more, and I'd genuinely prefer Hunterlaar.
Oh, and Eriksen is very nearly world class; we couldn't sign him even if we had the funds/wanted to in my opinion. He will have his pick of the clubs.
Torres - no
Eriksen - no chance unfortunately
Huntelaar - possibly
Torres
Walcott
Sturridge Depending on Torres
Huntelaar
Eriksen
no, i wouldnt take him back, suarez is scoring regularly and rodgers wants to bring in players that would essentially play a wide striker role, getting into the box and giving suarez options instead of doing it all himself, which is why he wanted dempsey, and why i wouldnt be surprised if we moved for walcott
The only place torres will be heading for is atleti.
Who's seriously gonna stump up £25m for him??
Anzi,PSG??
Not likely,he'll be used to get the price down on falcao.
Either that or falcao comes anyway and relegates torres to the bench permanantly.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
The Return?
Page 1 of 1
posted on 14/11/12
No.
posted on 14/11/12
I'd have him for 15m if he took a massive pay cut.
posted on 14/11/12
No,
Would not have him back.
His attitude in the final 12 months was almost as poor as his form.
He has been playing terribly for 2 and a half years now so why would we fork out 25million for that?
posted on 14/11/12
Yes i know torres as been terrible for chelsea but they dont play the same way we do
....................................................................
So, a team that creates less chances for him to miss is a better team for him to play in????
posted on 14/11/12
STOP ALL THESE TORRES RUBBISH
Driving me
posted on 14/11/12
you would be better of signing Walcott and Huntelaar imo
posted on 14/11/12
We won;t get the Hunter. He is being courted by some of Europe's best teams. Why would he come to us in the nbottom half of our league and not in the champions league.
posted on 14/11/12
So you seriously think we might sign Torres AND Huntelaar AND someone like Erikson.
I hope for your sake you are under 16 and/or drunk.
posted on 14/11/12
man from del monte chelsea's supporting 3 shoot more than assist as liverpool's supporting 3 assist rather than shoot thats my opionon chelsea have more midfielders score for them than we do must tell you something
posted on 14/11/12
righteous - i want us to sign a striker 'Hunterlaar' a creative midfielder LIKE erikson and i asked if there was any turth in torres talk
posted on 14/11/12
Ha ha, you lot make me laugh. I know Torres has been absolutely rubbish since leaving you boys but why would he come back to you lot now in the shape you are in, he left you lot to win things.
posted on 14/11/12
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Have some commas.
posted on 14/11/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 14/11/12
Unless he wants to half his wages to 80k then you can forget this pipe dream of a Torres return.
posted on 14/11/12
No, because Torres isn't a £25,000,000 striker. £15,000,000 and yes I'd take him back and I think he could do a job. But he isn't a 30 goal a season striker any more, and I'd genuinely prefer Hunterlaar.
posted on 14/11/12
Oh, and Eriksen is very nearly world class; we couldn't sign him even if we had the funds/wanted to in my opinion. He will have his pick of the clubs.
posted on 14/11/12
Torres - no
Eriksen - no chance unfortunately
Huntelaar - possibly
posted on 14/11/12
Torres
Walcott
Sturridge Depending on Torres
Huntelaar
Eriksen
posted on 14/11/12
no, i wouldnt take him back, suarez is scoring regularly and rodgers wants to bring in players that would essentially play a wide striker role, getting into the box and giving suarez options instead of doing it all himself, which is why he wanted dempsey, and why i wouldnt be surprised if we moved for walcott
posted on 14/11/12
The only place torres will be heading for is atleti.
Who's seriously gonna stump up £25m for him??
Anzi,PSG??
Not likely,he'll be used to get the price down on falcao.
Either that or falcao comes anyway and relegates torres to the bench permanantly.
Page 1 of 1