Its relevant to the original point you made you utter numpty. Its not like he made those points out of nowhere. You are the one who brought up the whole trophies issue to this thread.
The article is pathetic, based on a sample size no bigger than a mosquito's d-ck.
I guess that's why you related to it!
Then why respond? I answered a question that was aksed by a Man Utd fan. The op has done his job but its easy with fools like you around.
i don't know, he seems to have wound you up more than anyone else
If you want to WUM then at least be accurate, Torres has 2 goals
Wound me up?
I answered a question asked by a United fan and responded to one your 'jokes' that makes no sense.
Oh and Torres really does only have one goal for Chelsea.
You count Gerivinho's friendly goals, but not Torres's friendly goals. he scored against Wycombe
"he scored against wycombe".
that sounded like such a childish response ,sorry. plus torres has been with you for about half a year (which gives him an advantage).
Thank you for your insight. Torres is bad. I still like him. Chelsea are terrible. I still like them. Have a nice day.
soccer?lol.
I'm an Arsenal fan but, sorry mate, this article is sad. Yes, Gervinho had a great start today and if he continues like that then he will turn out to be another AW gem of a finding, but Torres is a top quality striker. He just got off to a bad start with Chelsea for a range of different reasons: mid season, carrying inj
you do realise this article is a joke wind up , right? (well i think it is)
A Childish response to a Childish article with childish posters. Makes sense to me
oh come on.. where's all your sense of humour gone lads? this isnt the liverpool board where we sit around all day with a serious face and filter everyone
mceachran > wilshere
Sign in if you want to comment
Arsenals investment!
Page 2 of 2
posted on 23/7/11
Its relevant to the original point you made you utter numpty. Its not like he made those points out of nowhere. You are the one who brought up the whole trophies issue to this thread.
posted on 23/7/11
The article is pathetic, based on a sample size no bigger than a mosquito's d-ck.
I guess that's why you related to it!
posted on 23/7/11
Then why respond? I answered a question that was aksed by a Man Utd fan. The op has done his job but its easy with fools like you around.
posted on 23/7/11
i don't know, he seems to have wound you up more than anyone else
posted on 23/7/11
If you want to WUM then at least be accurate, Torres has 2 goals
posted on 23/7/11
Wound me up?
I answered a question asked by a United fan and responded to one your 'jokes' that makes no sense.
Oh and Torres really does only have one goal for Chelsea.
posted on 23/7/11
Chelsea have no history
posted on 23/7/11
You count Gerivinho's friendly goals, but not Torres's friendly goals. he scored against Wycombe
posted on 23/7/11
"he scored against wycombe".
that sounded like such a childish response ,sorry. plus torres has been with you for about half a year (which gives him an advantage).
posted on 23/7/11
Thank you for your insight. Torres is bad. I still like him. Chelsea are terrible. I still like them. Have a nice day.
soccer?lol.
posted on 23/7/11
I'm an Arsenal fan but, sorry mate, this article is sad. Yes, Gervinho had a great start today and if he continues like that then he will turn out to be another AW gem of a finding, but Torres is a top quality striker. He just got off to a bad start with Chelsea for a range of different reasons: mid season, carrying inj
posted on 23/7/11
you do realise this article is a joke wind up , right? (well i think it is)
posted on 23/7/11
A Childish response to a Childish article with childish posters. Makes sense to me
posted on 23/7/11
oh come on.. where's all your sense of humour gone lads? this isnt the liverpool board where we sit around all day with a serious face and filter everyone
mceachran > wilshere
posted on 23/7/11
Kalou>RVP
posted on 23/7/11
roman > kroenke
Page 2 of 2