He would be a perfect fit to come on back to Liverpool via Brendans Route1

He could flick on and Suarez chase

That's The Doors TOOR.

You are getting your comedians and your bands mixed up.

http://www.ja606.co.uk/comments/viewAllComments/161009

I love the way TOOR says 'Has anyone seen West Ham play football this season,they play some decent stuff' to try and justify that Carroll would indeed fit into Brendans style of football and yet on other threads he calls them nothing but a hoofball team and their managers style of play would suit Everton if Moyes left us.

As I say TOOR knows fook all about football

what about the City side that came up?

They had quite a few good players

I think

It was a while ago

This is just bitter moaning now, i'm off to watch the football.


Laters!

Agree with Chronic but if Chelsea and Liverpool get strikers in the window or a striker they'll finish at least one place higher than Chronic's prediction IMO.

Aww bless Phil still lying and even added a new topic to lie about.

Come on Phil - prove your lies. You see this is the part where you always fall down. Doesn't it tell you something?

TOOR you called me a liar and then when confronted you feebly came up that I lied about your opinion of Carroll.You have gone on constantly for months about how Brendan should bring back Carroll back to Liverpool as he would fit into the way Brendan sets up his team.

So once again TOOR where is the lie you have accused me of.

Do you actually know what a lie is

Yes Phil - I like Carroll as a player and I believed he should have been given a chance in this system or at least statues the season on the bench as we don't have a striker. I have never said he's the missing piece, that's just another one of your lies? you lying little toe tag.

Also I said that about West Ham earlier in the season when they were playing decent stuff - highlighted by their league position, it was nothing to do with justifying Carroll. Another one of your lies. Your nose must be the size of Fellaini's hair stack. Philnochio

Hughton did a great job internally rather than externally if that makes sense. Transformed possibly the most chaotic squad in PL history into a settled squad with a great team spirit which still stands to this day. He was unfortunate to lose his job and is still very well liked in the area. He'll keep Norwich up. He's not a great manager as some have said but he's a very capable manager. I love him

I think if I searched hard enough I could find you saying that Carroll would be ideal for the role of a hold up forward.Because you do not use the phrase 'missing link' doesn't mean a thing.I have pointed out you think Carroll should be in Liverpool's starting eleven and shows everyone how much(little) you actually know about football.

It's toe rag not toe tag any scouser could tell you that

if you meant to call me toe tag then I take offenceon being likened to a tag on a dead persons big toe

Lying toe rag - I have already told you that I believe Carroll would be good in Brendan's preferred system. If you'd said that then fine but you chose to lie, hoping it would invite ridicule, you lying little toe rag.

ohhhh so banging on about how great Carroll is and how he would fit into Brendans system perfectly and Brendan should give him a chance doesn't equate to being likened to you thinking he may be the missing link.

My bad me thinking all this time you have been going on about Carroll that that was what you actually meant.

Again where is the lie.There's a lot of posters on here,many Liverpool supporters too who know what you really are.

As I've said before I don't even have it in me to pity you

Look I've got better things to do than justify myself to a lying toe rag. If you want to debate any actual things I did say, fire away, until then youre talking to yourself.

Run along TOOR and behave yourself in future,it's not nice calling people liars and I take it it's even worse being pulled up and being shown up over it.

Play nicely now

You really have deluded yourself into thinking you're telling the truth haven't you?

comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 26 minutes ago
Also I said that about West Ham earlier in the season when they were playing decent stuff - highlighted by their league position, it was nothing to do with justifying Carroll. Another one of your lies. Your nose must be the size of Fellaini's hair stack. Philnochio
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted on 21/10/12
comment by honestlivpool_five_times (U1661)
posted 8 hours, 9 minutes ago
But you need to do it in training before getting a chance. You wont get a chance just because you cost £35m
------------------------------------------
He only had a few training sessions as he was away at the Euro's and then had extended leave with the rest of the players. That's just an excuse you've made up. The fact is, he wasn't given a chance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Are you suggesting that I AM THE LIAR TOOR,think about it,you don't suggest you told me that the article was about how West Ham were playing and nothing about Carroll,but the article is called 'CARROLL' and you have made the above comment in it.

Are you looking to change your stance on this.As I say
people are very much aware of what you are TOOR.

Spurs 5th..bookmarked..

17. Aston Villa - by the skin of their teeth. a whisker. the hair on my chinny chin chin. final day late goal survival.
--

Have you decided to lose your 100 quid...

No Phil, I said that West Ham were playing decent stuff in relation to somebody saying West Ham were just playing hoofball up to Carroll. You're lying again. Please stop my ribs are aching laughing at you.

The comment you posted just confirms what I said above in that I believe Carroll would have worked in Brendan's system but wasn't given a chance.

Why would I change my stance why I have said this many times on the site and I believe it but it hasn't been tried for me to think differently?

You really are stupid

You take a comment which proves me right and post it thinking it proves you right even though it repeats what I've said and nothing you claim I said.