One thing this poster diesn't like is facts.
====
that's one way of blowing someone's rhetoric view by debunking it with FACTS and STATISTICS!
I've obliterated the chump many times when it comes to talking football.
He is easily debunked
"He couldn't have. He wasn't planning to cut anything for the first two years of his term" to which i respond that a parliament isn't 2 years...it can last up to 5 years. Read and think!
.................
What do you think I meant, by 'the first two years of his term'? This really isn't hard.
I am not sure how you think that I think a parliment runs for 2 years.
I know Metro is very stupid, and doesn't understand simple things.
still haven't answered the question about bailing out the banks...
comment by joely_the_goaly. (U15498)
posted 5 minutes ago
still haven't answered the question about bailing out the banks...
.............................
What was the question?
still haven't answered the question about bailing out the banks...
.............................
What was the question?
=======
WOULD YOU HAVE BAILED THE BANKS OUT- YES OR NO?
WOULD YOU HAVE BAILED THE BANKS OUT- YES OR NO?
.....................................
Me personnaly. No.
If I was PM, yes.
Now, what has that got to do with anything? No one is disputing Labour had to bail out the banks.
You think that the National Deficit is totally down to the bail outs, don't you?
I wouldn't bother answering the question VC, as it's clearly a loaded one, designed to try and belittle you, on a subject that actually has NOTHING to do with this actual article.
You guys, take your petty pseudo-politics to a more befitting environment.
as it's clearly a loaded one, designed to try and belittle you,
.....................
Not really working then, is it.
Haven't seen you for a while Ripleys hows things?
Pretty tough at the moment. Business is going through a lull at the moment, but working my backside off networking to turn it around. So been commuting a lot recently between Manchester and London. To be honest, I'm shattered!!
Watched the game at the weekend though. Fair play to you lot. Deserved winners (nothing wrong with that goal you had disallowed). But the way the game ended, namely the actions of a handful of idiotic City fans, well, that just left a sour taste in my mouth and spoiled what was a tremendous match.
How's you?
pretty much the same as usual. The weather is definately better in the usa, than the UK.
My thoughts were the same as yours on the match. I went mental wjhen Young scored. I don't think there would have been a come back at 3 down.
Glad Bobby decided not to start with Carlos.
as it's clearly a loaded one, designed to try and belittle you, on a subject that actually has NOTHING to do with this actual article.
....
Of course. And here I was thinking it was him that brought the conversation to government cuts
Not really working then, is it
......
Don't be so sure. We were having a hoot at your inability to answer straight-forward questions.
His answer is confusing.
He seems to be putting down the last Labour party that led the country whilst agreeing that if he were in such a position (laughable i know) that he would have done the same thing.
"He seems to be putting down the last Labour party that led the country whilst agreeing that if he were in such a position (laughable i know) that he would have done the same thing."
How do you work that one out? He said he would have done the same thing with bailing out the banks, that was it.
comment by Metro_ (U6770)
posted 13 hours, 59 minutes ago
His answer is confusing.
................
Maybe the fault is at your end Metro.
There seem to be a few other people who have managed to grasp what I am saying.
Tories and Labour - opposite sides of the same coin.
How do you work that one out? He said he would have done the same thing with bailing out the banks,
.......
Well it seems as if he can't decide on whether they put the country in this position or whether in fact he would have acted the same way.
He probably needs to look at the levels of growth more closely to understand why certain decisions are made instead of the usual bile of
'Put us there in the first place'
Metro
None of my posts here are actually to do with the banking collapse.
Please try and keep up.
And as you seem to be completely oblivious to this, The Labour Government were borrowing money on a massive amount about six years prior to the banking collapse. It started just after the second term.
In the first term, Gord was in the black.
VC strikes me as a Thatcherite but with Call-Me-Dave's accession to the apex of the Tory party, he seems to have defected to the UKIP.
TRC
I vote for who I believe is right to lead the country at the time.
I voted for Blair first time round.
So many people in the UK (and the USA) waste their votes by alligning themselves to one party. It is pretty much why nothing ever gets fixed.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Sign in if you want to comment
Excellent Article...
Page 3 of 4
posted on 12/12/12
One thing this poster diesn't like is facts.
====
that's one way of blowing someone's rhetoric view by debunking it with FACTS and STATISTICS!
posted on 12/12/12
I've obliterated the chump many times when it comes to talking football.
He is easily debunked
posted on 12/12/12
"He couldn't have. He wasn't planning to cut anything for the first two years of his term" to which i respond that a parliament isn't 2 years...it can last up to 5 years. Read and think!
.................
What do you think I meant, by 'the first two years of his term'? This really isn't hard.
I am not sure how you think that I think a parliment runs for 2 years.
I know Metro is very stupid, and doesn't understand simple things.
posted on 12/12/12
still haven't answered the question about bailing out the banks...
posted on 12/12/12
comment by joely_the_goaly. (U15498)
posted 5 minutes ago
still haven't answered the question about bailing out the banks...
.............................
What was the question?
posted on 12/12/12
still haven't answered the question about bailing out the banks...
.............................
What was the question?
=======
WOULD YOU HAVE BAILED THE BANKS OUT- YES OR NO?
posted on 12/12/12
WOULD YOU HAVE BAILED THE BANKS OUT- YES OR NO?
.....................................
Me personnaly. No.
If I was PM, yes.
Now, what has that got to do with anything? No one is disputing Labour had to bail out the banks.
You think that the National Deficit is totally down to the bail outs, don't you?
posted on 12/12/12
I wouldn't bother answering the question VC, as it's clearly a loaded one, designed to try and belittle you, on a subject that actually has NOTHING to do with this actual article.
You guys, take your petty pseudo-politics to a more befitting environment.
posted on 12/12/12
as it's clearly a loaded one, designed to try and belittle you,
.....................
Not really working then, is it.
posted on 12/12/12
No it's not.
posted on 12/12/12
Haven't seen you for a while Ripleys hows things?
posted on 12/12/12
Pretty tough at the moment. Business is going through a lull at the moment, but working my backside off networking to turn it around. So been commuting a lot recently between Manchester and London. To be honest, I'm shattered!!
Watched the game at the weekend though. Fair play to you lot. Deserved winners (nothing wrong with that goal you had disallowed). But the way the game ended, namely the actions of a handful of idiotic City fans, well, that just left a sour taste in my mouth and spoiled what was a tremendous match.
How's you?
posted on 12/12/12
pretty much the same as usual. The weather is definately better in the usa, than the UK.
My thoughts were the same as yours on the match. I went mental wjhen Young scored. I don't think there would have been a come back at 3 down.
Glad Bobby decided not to start with Carlos.
posted on 12/12/12
as it's clearly a loaded one, designed to try and belittle you, on a subject that actually has NOTHING to do with this actual article.
....
Of course. And here I was thinking it was him that brought the conversation to government cuts
posted on 12/12/12
Not really working then, is it
......
Don't be so sure. We were having a hoot at your inability to answer straight-forward questions.
posted on 12/12/12
He answered it Metro.
posted on 12/12/12
His answer is confusing.
He seems to be putting down the last Labour party that led the country whilst agreeing that if he were in such a position (laughable i know) that he would have done the same thing.
posted on 13/12/12
"He seems to be putting down the last Labour party that led the country whilst agreeing that if he were in such a position (laughable i know) that he would have done the same thing."
How do you work that one out? He said he would have done the same thing with bailing out the banks, that was it.
posted on 13/12/12
comment by Metro_ (U6770)
posted 13 hours, 59 minutes ago
His answer is confusing.
................
Maybe the fault is at your end Metro.
There seem to be a few other people who have managed to grasp what I am saying.
posted on 13/12/12
Tories and Labour - opposite sides of the same coin.
posted on 13/12/12
How do you work that one out? He said he would have done the same thing with bailing out the banks,
.......
Well it seems as if he can't decide on whether they put the country in this position or whether in fact he would have acted the same way.
He probably needs to look at the levels of growth more closely to understand why certain decisions are made instead of the usual bile of
'Put us there in the first place'
posted on 13/12/12
Metro
None of my posts here are actually to do with the banking collapse.
Please try and keep up.
And as you seem to be completely oblivious to this, The Labour Government were borrowing money on a massive amount about six years prior to the banking collapse. It started just after the second term.
In the first term, Gord was in the black.
posted on 13/12/12
VC strikes me as a Thatcherite but with Call-Me-Dave's accession to the apex of the Tory party, he seems to have defected to the UKIP.
posted on 13/12/12
TRC
I vote for who I believe is right to lead the country at the time.
I voted for Blair first time round.
So many people in the UK (and the USA) waste their votes by alligning themselves to one party. It is pretty much why nothing ever gets fixed.
posted on 13/12/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Page 3 of 4