Liverpudlians are a funny lot.
Supposedly.
I feel I've been cheated.
Maybe historically they were.
History
Not really that was a documentary!
The DVD is a celebration achieving 4th!
Princess Bale
Spurs won nothing
Croaky poo squatter
The DVD was a review of the season.
There is one every season.
We celebrated getting 4th.
I don't get your 'joke'
The DVD was a review of the season.
There is one every season.
We celebrated getting 4th.
I don't get your 'joke'
-----
We have a DVD about winning the CL, the Spurs fans have a DVD.
The league is not important. There is no difference between finishing 2nd and 17th.
All that matters is the league cup and possession.
Why would you only do it over three years? Is it possibly because thats' when your ridiculous amount of investment is starting to pay off in the league even though you still win nothing?
Why don't you do a transfer spend per trophy or by points gained in the PL?
Genuine question.
Why don't you do a transfer spend per trophy or by points gained in the PL?
------
Spurs would need to win a trophy before they can do that.
Genuine answer, Robbing:
I assume it's cos it's only the last 3 seasons we've been better than you. Undoubtedly you've amounted vastly more points than Spurs in the Prem.
Not the point of the article though.
What's really up with you spurs fans? There has been some serious animosity towards lfc for a good while now, come on you can talk openly here, I'll start it seems that you spurs fans are portraying your alligence to your club by criticizing another one, live you don't love spurs but you hate another club! What's up with that?
So you're saying that spurs are where they are because of the transfer dealing done since 2009? That's what the thread is about?
"Genuine question."
1. Rough period Spurs became vastly better.
2. Reliable stats very tough (and time-consuming). Same source for both sides.
You can go back further if you want.
good article,
the deluded scousers shown up once again
AVBs Jacket (U16370)
Can I go back to the last ten years? Say to about 2001?
comment by vdvisgood (U1109)
posted 54 minutes ago
You know finishing 4th isn't a real achievement right?
___________
For Liverpool it facking is
------
The article is just answering an argument - nothing more nothing less, i dont get the animosity
1. Rough period Spurs became vastly better.
Robbing - the same trends will be demonstrated, but if you can bothered. Go ahead.
Robbing - I think the sole point of this article is to say that Spurs are better than Liverpool right now purely due to substantially more investment. The OP showed this is not the case. We can go back to the dawn of time but it'd be pretty useless to factor in signings in 2001 with the standard of the squad today.
See what you were trying to do there though.
Sign in if you want to comment
Spurs and Liverpool (financial comparison)
Page 4 of 26
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10
posted on 18/12/12
Liverpudlians are a funny lot.
Supposedly.
I feel I've been cheated.
Maybe historically they were.
History
posted on 18/12/12
LAL
posted on 18/12/12
Not really that was a documentary!
The DVD is a celebration achieving 4th!
posted on 18/12/12
posted on 18/12/12
Princess Bale
Spurs won nothing
Croaky poo squatter
posted on 18/12/12
The DVD was a review of the season.
There is one every season.
We celebrated getting 4th.
I don't get your 'joke'
posted on 18/12/12
The DVD was a review of the season.
There is one every season.
We celebrated getting 4th.
I don't get your 'joke'
-----
posted on 18/12/12
Being Mid-Table
posted on 18/12/12
We have a DVD about winning the CL, the Spurs fans have a DVD.
posted on 18/12/12
The league is not important. There is no difference between finishing 2nd and 17th.
All that matters is the league cup and possession.
posted on 18/12/12
Why would you only do it over three years? Is it possibly because thats' when your ridiculous amount of investment is starting to pay off in the league even though you still win nothing?
Why don't you do a transfer spend per trophy or by points gained in the PL?
Genuine question.
posted on 18/12/12
Why don't you do a transfer spend per trophy or by points gained in the PL?
------
Spurs would need to win a trophy before they can do that.
posted on 18/12/12
They've won a couple.
posted on 18/12/12
Genuine answer, Robbing:
I assume it's cos it's only the last 3 seasons we've been better than you. Undoubtedly you've amounted vastly more points than Spurs in the Prem.
Not the point of the article though.
posted on 18/12/12
Liverpool 64-36 Villa
posted on 18/12/12
What's really up with you spurs fans? There has been some serious animosity towards lfc for a good while now, come on you can talk openly here, I'll start it seems that you spurs fans are portraying your alligence to your club by criticizing another one, live you don't love spurs but you hate another club! What's up with that?
posted on 18/12/12
So you're saying that spurs are where they are because of the transfer dealing done since 2009? That's what the thread is about?
posted on 18/12/12
"Genuine question."
1. Rough period Spurs became vastly better.
2. Reliable stats very tough (and time-consuming). Same source for both sides.
You can go back further if you want.
posted on 18/12/12
good article,
the deluded scousers shown up once again
posted on 18/12/12
AVBs Jacket (U16370)
Can I go back to the last ten years? Say to about 2001?
posted on 18/12/12
comment by vdvisgood (U1109)
posted 54 minutes ago
You know finishing 4th isn't a real achievement right?
___________
For Liverpool it facking is
------
posted on 18/12/12
The article is just answering an argument - nothing more nothing less, i dont get the animosity
posted on 18/12/12
1. Rough period Spurs became vastly better.
posted on 18/12/12
Robbing - the same trends will be demonstrated, but if you can bothered. Go ahead.
posted on 18/12/12
Robbing - I think the sole point of this article is to say that Spurs are better than Liverpool right now purely due to substantially more investment. The OP showed this is not the case. We can go back to the dawn of time but it'd be pretty useless to factor in signings in 2001 with the standard of the squad today.
See what you were trying to do there though.
Page 4 of 26
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10