Did Regan not beg and plead for Rangers to be allowed to remain in the SPL?

+++

Yes he did

First answer to a question on this article

Mitre,

The Spl has nowt to do with the SFA

So any other answers?

Q, do you have a big boaby?

Aye Second answer to a question on here.>

Of course we do but this thread is about Regan

+++

And why Bears have a problem with him...

Stop being evasive

Magners, of course they are related. I believe SPL teams need SFA approval to play in Europe.

Q,

That was a given, not an answer

Magners, do you think the Rangers situation was handled well, the national team situation has been handled well, reconstruction is being handled well?

The anger coming out of ibrox just now is comical.

Magners, is he a kafflik?

They don't like him. So what?
Are you Regan?

TCD - well someone needs to post FACTS on your article

BH,

No...but I would like to know exactly your beef with Regan.

So far, you've provided nothing but hyperbole

And do not tell me that Regan was responsible for the 4-6-0 manager being appointed

"So far, you've provided nothing but hyperbole"
------------------------------------------------------------------

If you really think it's hyperbole, tone it down a bit and the issues are still there.

Tell me these issues exactly and don't be using the national team as a reason for the beef you bears have with him...that one's not on, mate

"Tell me these issues exactly"
-----------------------------------------------

See above.

Tbh most fans from other teams that I've spoken with agree that Regan and Doncaster are incompetent.

In answer to TCDs op, I saw a nice list in the first link Super Ally put in his article that hit they key reasons.

0

Is what I see.

Not one specific issue then...just: " It wiz aw his fault ".

Poor show, bears.

My preferred one is; that Peter and he are best mates

gus,

Av trumped Super's article...that'll teach him to post oan the SFL pages

George Peat wis da man for the berz

Btw, mitre,

http://sport.stv.tv/football/clubs/rangers/109396-stewart-regan-claims-newco-rangers-must-play-in-the-first-division/

+++

You obviously didn't read the above link you provided.It states that Regan thought it wrong for Newco to be put into the 3rd division if booted out the Spl and that the 1st would be more appropriate.

Again bears...why is it you dislike the man who allowed $evco to buy their way in?

comment by Magners-How'd You Like Them Apples (U6593)
posted 15 minutes ago
Mitre,

The Spl has nowt to do with the SFA

So any other answers?

============================

http://sport.stv.tv/football/clubs/morton/110284-stewart-regan-under-fire-as-morton-repeat-rangers-spl-blocking-accusation/

Did you read that link first

"Regan thought it wrong for Newco to be put into the 3rd division if booted out the Spl and that the 1st would be more appropriate.

... the man who allowed $evco to buy their way in?"
---------------------------------------------

That's what you think happened - and you think that was him doing a good job?

comment by Magners-How'd You Like Them Apples (U6593)
posted 3 minutes ago
Btw, mitre,

http://sport.stv.tv/football/clubs/rangers/109396-stewart-regan-claims-newco-rangers-must-play-in-the-first-division/

+++

You obviously didn't read the above link you provided.It states that Regan thought it wrong for Newco to be put into the 3rd division if booted out the Spl and that the 1st would be more appropriate.

Again bears...why is it you dislike the man who allowed $evco to buy their way in?

==============================

You obviously did not read my post. It was wrong of him to try and pressure the sfl clubs to place rangers in the 1st division.

Under the mechanism he guided, we could only go to the SFL3.

If he wanted us in the sfl one he could have made it happen in accordance to the rules. The fact he could not work this out proves his stupidity.

This is all before we even take account of him 'favouriting' posts advocating that Rangers players should be executed.

I actually believe his excuse on this one, but what a stupid thing to do given the obvious connotations. No political savvy.