Decent defensively
-
so getting caught out of position every time the other team attacks is being decent defensively?
Coquelin played well <Ok>
Woj 5
Sagna 3
Mertesacker 6
Vermaelen 7
Gibbs 8
Diaby 5
Coquelin 7
Wilshere 6
Theo 5
Cazorla 6
Giroud 3
Ramsey 6
Arshavin 4
Coquelin 5 ..............................get real he was our best player ..............................
I only gave him a 4 Rev. He wasn't appalling defensively. Second half he was a bit better, if he wasn't I would've given him less.
Wouldn't have said Sagna was decent defensively. I thought he was your worst player.
Gibbs deserves praise although he was still a little rash in his decision making at the back.
I liked Coquelin, think he should be rated higher than Wilshere. Composed on the ball and put his body on the line.
I agree with Penguin's ratings.
Coq was the only one that looked like doing something.
Is it me or when ever we start Coq in a big game, we lose, and he ends up being our best player!?
Is it me or when ever we start Coq in a big game, we lose, and he ends up being our best player!?
=========
What a selfish player.
Coq was outstanding. Vermaelen played pretty well. Penalty was clear - there was minimal contact but contact there was and he is entitled to go down - he wouldn't get the penalty otherwise.
Coquelin was easily our best player until he went off injured. Put a lot off effort into his performance, composed, constant energy was key to our tempo in the second half. Looked weaker when he went off.
Ratings:
Szecesny - 6
Sagna - 3
Mert - 5
Verm 6.5
Gibbs - 6.5
Coq - 7
Wilshere - 5.5
Diaby - 4
Santi - 6.5
Giroud - 2
Walcott - 6
Ramsey - 5.5
Arshavin - 5
Honestly don't think Coq was that good. He was decent, comfortably better than Diaby but can't remember him doing anything particularly special, Chelsea were all over us in the first half and he went off early.
Comment deleted by Article Creator
Beaten by a child's response.
u have been put to the sowrd
Comment deleted by Article Creator
ramsey don't post untrue quotes. post the thing he said about cavani
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Game of two halves, player ratings
Page 1 of 1
posted on 20/1/13
Decent defensively
-
so getting caught out of position every time the other team attacks is being decent defensively?
posted on 20/1/13
Coquelin played well <Ok>
Woj 5
Sagna 3
Mertesacker 6
Vermaelen 7
Gibbs 8
Diaby 5
Coquelin 7
Wilshere 6
Theo 5
Cazorla 6
Giroud 3
Ramsey 6
Arshavin 4
posted on 20/1/13
Coquelin 5 ..............................get real he was our best player ..............................
posted on 20/1/13
I only gave him a 4 Rev. He wasn't appalling defensively. Second half he was a bit better, if he wasn't I would've given him less.
posted on 20/1/13
Wouldn't have said Sagna was decent defensively. I thought he was your worst player.
Gibbs deserves praise although he was still a little rash in his decision making at the back.
I liked Coquelin, think he should be rated higher than Wilshere. Composed on the ball and put his body on the line.
posted on 20/1/13
I agree with Penguin's ratings.
posted on 20/1/13
Dog
posted on 20/1/13
Andrei
posted on 20/1/13
Coq was the only one that looked like doing something.
Is it me or when ever we start Coq in a big game, we lose, and he ends up being our best player!?
posted on 20/1/13
Is it me or when ever we start Coq in a big game, we lose, and he ends up being our best player!?
=========
What a selfish player.
posted on 20/1/13
Coq was outstanding. Vermaelen played pretty well. Penalty was clear - there was minimal contact but contact there was and he is entitled to go down - he wouldn't get the penalty otherwise.
posted on 20/1/13
Coquelin was easily our best player until he went off injured. Put a lot off effort into his performance, composed, constant energy was key to our tempo in the second half. Looked weaker when he went off.
Ratings:
Szecesny - 6
Sagna - 3
Mert - 5
Verm 6.5
Gibbs - 6.5
Coq - 7
Wilshere - 5.5
Diaby - 4
Santi - 6.5
Giroud - 2
Walcott - 6
Ramsey - 5.5
Arshavin - 5
posted on 20/1/13
Honestly don't think Coq was that good. He was decent, comfortably better than Diaby but can't remember him doing anything particularly special, Chelsea were all over us in the first half and he went off early.
posted on 20/1/13
Comment deleted by Article Creator
posted on 20/1/13
No swearing
posted on 20/1/13
WUM
posted on 20/1/13
I know u r but wot am i
posted on 20/1/13
Beaten by a child's response.
posted on 20/1/13
u have been put to the sowrd
posted on 20/1/13
Comment deleted by Article Creator
posted on 20/1/13
ramsey don't post untrue quotes. post the thing he said about cavani
Page 1 of 1