I think it is 3-0 in Roger's favour. I doubt RF will relinquish so early. But again, as Matts Wilander said in the commentary (Stan Vs Novak) today, my every last penny would be on Roger.

Hi Manoj, good to see you here.Yes, its 3-0 in Rog's favour but raonic did come very close to beat him in all those 3 matches. I think he can do it although I wouldn't want it

I hope you didn't put money on it!

I just want to delete this post altogetherly, grrr however I am glad that Fed won and that too so convincingly. There might be another slam for him. The guy is just amazing.

Fed's serving was superb, but still a lot of scope for improvement for Raonic.

As long as Ferrer doesn't tax fed too much, he has a great chance to add to his total at this tournament.

Raonic is a limited player. I find it amusing how the pundits are impressing us with onanistic fervour in regards to this chap.

I would put money on this kid NEVER making top seven.

dont know why I thought Ferrer was playing Fed in semi

Red, so you'd say he could make 8th then?

Maybe, Jonty

Personally, i think he is overhyped. Grigor and the erratic Tomic are demonstrably better IMO.

Who would you rate more highly, raonic or isner?

It's tough to say as Raonic too have few critical flaws in his game.

I don't rate either.

But gun-to-my-head, marginally Raonic.

I think Isner really upped his game about 10 months ago, much more comfortable coming in and volleying, but seems so relaxed I'm never sure how committed he is to the hard work side of things.

Jonty, that is very generous of you.

That is straight from the 'Andy Roddick has improved school of thought' with each coach change from Connors and particularly Larry Stefanski.

After the brouhaha, analysis actually showed Roddick was much worse.


His early retirement (Federer's junior) pretty much affirms it.

I'm a generous type of chap

I do generally try to see the positive side of tennis, until it is absolutely impossible not to.