i begin to wonder if any of his money went blatters way
Chelsea would be NOTHING without Roman !! Anyone wish to argue otherwise feel free but he is the ONLY reason Chelsea have won anything recently.
The flaw in the arguement is that Arsenal would have won the league in the Roman era.
I am sure most of my fellow Gooners would be happy for United to have 2 extra titles if we could have had one extra.
You forgot one thing. The refs tend to be used to make sure that there are 2 teams who win the league regularly, so if he had not poured all of that money in it would have been Arsenal instead. PLus the extra money from winning more would have meant more money to spend on the team so more success.
With Man C now having billions
You forgot one thing. The refs tend to be used to make sure that there are 2 teams who win the league regularly, so if he had not poured all of that money in it would have been Arsenal instead. PLus the extra money from winning more would have meant more money to spend on the team so more success.
With Man C now having billions
You forgot one thing. The refs tend to be used to make sure that there are 2 teams who win the league regularly, so if he had not poured all of that money in it would have been Arsenal instead. PLus the extra money from winning more would have meant more money to spend on the team so more success.
With Man C now having billions
You forgot one thing. The refs tend to be used to make sure that there are 2 teams who win the league regularly, so if he had not poured all of that money in it would have been Arsenal instead. PLus the extra money from winning more would have meant more money to spend on the team so more success.
With Man C now having billions
You forgot one thing. The refs tend to be used to make sure that there are 2 teams who win the league regularly, so if he had not poured all of that money in it would have been Arsenal instead. PLus the extra money from winning more would have meant more money to spend on the team so more success.
With Man C now having billions
You forgot one thing. The refs tend to be used to make sure that there are 2 teams who win the league regularly, so if he had not poured all of that money in it would have been Arsenal instead. PLus the extra money from winning more would have meant more money to spend on the team so more success.
With Man C now having billions
??????
My last comment suddenly got posted before I finished. No idea what happened, but as I was saying....
With Man C now having billions will they let it be a 3 horse race or will Chelsea "drop away".
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Ambramovich vs. Man United. !!!!!!
Page 1 of 1
posted on 27/5/11
i begin to wonder if any of his money went blatters way
posted on 27/5/11
Chelsea would be NOTHING without Roman !! Anyone wish to argue otherwise feel free but he is the ONLY reason Chelsea have won anything recently.
posted on 28/5/11
The flaw in the arguement is that Arsenal would have won the league in the Roman era.
I am sure most of my fellow Gooners would be happy for United to have 2 extra titles if we could have had one extra.
posted on 28/5/11
You forgot one thing. The refs tend to be used to make sure that there are 2 teams who win the league regularly, so if he had not poured all of that money in it would have been Arsenal instead. PLus the extra money from winning more would have meant more money to spend on the team so more success.
With Man C now having billions
posted on 28/5/11
You forgot one thing. The refs tend to be used to make sure that there are 2 teams who win the league regularly, so if he had not poured all of that money in it would have been Arsenal instead. PLus the extra money from winning more would have meant more money to spend on the team so more success.
With Man C now having billions
posted on 28/5/11
You forgot one thing. The refs tend to be used to make sure that there are 2 teams who win the league regularly, so if he had not poured all of that money in it would have been Arsenal instead. PLus the extra money from winning more would have meant more money to spend on the team so more success.
With Man C now having billions
posted on 28/5/11
You forgot one thing. The refs tend to be used to make sure that there are 2 teams who win the league regularly, so if he had not poured all of that money in it would have been Arsenal instead. PLus the extra money from winning more would have meant more money to spend on the team so more success.
With Man C now having billions
posted on 28/5/11
You forgot one thing. The refs tend to be used to make sure that there are 2 teams who win the league regularly, so if he had not poured all of that money in it would have been Arsenal instead. PLus the extra money from winning more would have meant more money to spend on the team so more success.
With Man C now having billions
posted on 28/5/11
You forgot one thing. The refs tend to be used to make sure that there are 2 teams who win the league regularly, so if he had not poured all of that money in it would have been Arsenal instead. PLus the extra money from winning more would have meant more money to spend on the team so more success.
With Man C now having billions
posted on 28/5/11
??????
My last comment suddenly got posted before I finished. No idea what happened, but as I was saying....
With Man C now having billions will they let it be a 3 horse race or will Chelsea "drop away".
Page 1 of 1