hazard deserves a dry slap
should be out for the season
I think this is absolutely ridiculous. Not because I think Hazard should be banned but the said three games isn't enough and then charged him. They can never make their fecking minds up.
The FA needs disbanded and a new organisation brought in. It's turned into a circus now.
More to do with having him available that pleases me.
The 32m was more to do with the future than the present.
While I agree with the FA's decision, it still makes no sense when you look at some of the other crazy decisions they have made over the years. There's no consistency. They seem to make it up as they go
posted 7 minutes ago
I think this is absolutely ridiculous. Not because I think Hazard should be banned but the said three games isn't enough and then charged him. They can never make their fecking minds up.
The FA needs disbanded and a new organisation brought in. It's turned into a circus now.
.....................
Obviously I undrestand why the Chelsea fans will be happy wit this, but I agree with the poster highlighted.
How can you justify banning Cantona for 8 months, for kicking a thug who was giving him abuse, and a three game ban to Hazard for kicking a ball boy who was doing his job. (Yes the ball boy was being a prat).
There is just no consistancy here at all.
Hazard didn't kick the ball boy, he kick his chubby fat prat belly
Hazard didn't kick the ball boy, he kick his chubby fat prat belly
..................
Do you have an English version of this? I don't speak idiot.
Furk u and ignore it u ducks as
How can you justify banning Cantona for 8 months, for kicking a thug who was giving him abuse, and a three game ban to Hazard for kicking a ball boy who was doing his job. (Yes the ball boy was being a prat).
----------
for one thing, Hazard wasn't looking to hurt the guy
The FA play to the baying mob .....
They judge what the public and Press want and they give it to them
This time they saw there was a lot of opinion in favour of Hazard (some would even argue that the red card was not justified) and acted accordingly
man utd fan that likes essex cricket...
long time man utd fan.... but never seen them play
standard glory hunter
comment by DidierBATorresmiereles☁☛☛✁☎ (U8348)
posted 6 minutes ago
Furk u and ignore it u ducks as
............................
What a strange little individual.
Do you wet the bed?
for one thing, Hazard wasn't looking to hurt the guy
..........................................
Kicking him was a good idea then.
United still sore after they missed out with Hazard and settled for Kagawa
A sensible decision by the FA, no need for a lengthy ban
Um well you see Cantona used a martial arts move on someone whilst Hazard followed through having kicked the ball there is a massive difference
Comparing it to Cantona
Hazard didn't run in to the crowd and karate kick a boy. He tried to kick the ball that a guy was lying on top off
standard glory hunter
................
Never been ashamed to admit it. Lancashire sucked in them days, and Essex were the top dog.
What Hazard did wouldnt amount to assault is the difference
comment by TERRY - LEADER - LAMPARD - LEGEND (U4640)
posted 1 minute ago
Comparing it to Cantona
...............
I didn't compare it to Cantona at all. I was comparing the difference of the punishments.
Yes they were different circumstances, but not by that big a difference in punishment dished out.
I love this comparison with Cantona Eric assaulted a fan, Hazard tried to retrieve the ball from a ball boy
They are on two different ends of the spectrum really.
I love this comparison with Cantona Eric assaulted a fan, Hazard tried to retrieve the ball from a ball boy
...............
I love this blind devotion to your player (bit like the dips with Suarez) and your utter deviation from the facts.
Eric assaulted a fan, Hazard kicked a ball boy .
Now, that has corrected your error.
United still sore after they missed out with Hazard and settled for Kagawa
..............
Not really. I had never seen Hazard play when you bought him, and I have not been overly impressed by what I have seen since. Neither have I with Kagawa by the way.
.............
A sensible decision by the FA, no need for a lengthy ban
....................
I agree with that to a degree. Probably a six game ban would have been about right. My big problem was the lenght of the Cantona ban.
comment by Suso The Magician (U11770)
posted 50 minutes ago
hazard deserves a dry slap
=====================
Yet another poor dipper the education system let slip through its fingers
Sign in if you want to comment
Hazard's ban will not increase
Page 1 of 4
posted on 31/1/13
hazard deserves a dry slap
posted on 31/1/13
should be out for the season
posted on 31/1/13
I think this is absolutely ridiculous. Not because I think Hazard should be banned but the said three games isn't enough and then charged him. They can never make their fecking minds up.
The FA needs disbanded and a new organisation brought in. It's turned into a circus now.
posted on 31/1/13
More to do with having him available that pleases me.
The 32m was more to do with the future than the present.
posted on 31/1/13
While I agree with the FA's decision, it still makes no sense when you look at some of the other crazy decisions they have made over the years. There's no consistency. They seem to make it up as they go
posted on 31/1/13
posted 7 minutes ago
I think this is absolutely ridiculous. Not because I think Hazard should be banned but the said three games isn't enough and then charged him. They can never make their fecking minds up.
The FA needs disbanded and a new organisation brought in. It's turned into a circus now.
.....................
Obviously I undrestand why the Chelsea fans will be happy wit this, but I agree with the poster highlighted.
How can you justify banning Cantona for 8 months, for kicking a thug who was giving him abuse, and a three game ban to Hazard for kicking a ball boy who was doing his job. (Yes the ball boy was being a prat).
There is just no consistancy here at all.
posted on 31/1/13
Hazard didn't kick the ball boy, he kick his chubby fat prat belly
posted on 31/1/13
Hazard didn't kick the ball boy, he kick his chubby fat prat belly
..................
Do you have an English version of this? I don't speak idiot.
posted on 31/1/13
Furk u and ignore it u ducks as
posted on 31/1/13
How can you justify banning Cantona for 8 months, for kicking a thug who was giving him abuse, and a three game ban to Hazard for kicking a ball boy who was doing his job. (Yes the ball boy was being a prat).
----------
for one thing, Hazard wasn't looking to hurt the guy
posted on 31/1/13
The FA play to the baying mob .....
They judge what the public and Press want and they give it to them
This time they saw there was a lot of opinion in favour of Hazard (some would even argue that the red card was not justified) and acted accordingly
posted on 31/1/13
man utd fan that likes essex cricket...
long time man utd fan.... but never seen them play
standard glory hunter
posted on 31/1/13
comment by DidierBATorresmiereles☁☛☛✁☎ (U8348)
posted 6 minutes ago
Furk u and ignore it u ducks as
............................
What a strange little individual.
Do you wet the bed?
posted on 31/1/13
for one thing, Hazard wasn't looking to hurt the guy
..........................................
Kicking him was a good idea then.
posted on 31/1/13
United still sore after they missed out with Hazard and settled for Kagawa
A sensible decision by the FA, no need for a lengthy ban
posted on 31/1/13
Um well you see Cantona used a martial arts move on someone whilst Hazard followed through having kicked the ball there is a massive difference
posted on 31/1/13
Comparing it to Cantona
Hazard didn't run in to the crowd and karate kick a boy. He tried to kick the ball that a guy was lying on top off
posted on 31/1/13
standard glory hunter
................
Never been ashamed to admit it. Lancashire sucked in them days, and Essex were the top dog.
posted on 31/1/13
What Hazard did wouldnt amount to assault is the difference
posted on 31/1/13
comment by TERRY - LEADER - LAMPARD - LEGEND (U4640)
posted 1 minute ago
Comparing it to Cantona
...............
I didn't compare it to Cantona at all. I was comparing the difference of the punishments.
Yes they were different circumstances, but not by that big a difference in punishment dished out.
posted on 31/1/13
I love this comparison with Cantona Eric assaulted a fan, Hazard tried to retrieve the ball from a ball boy
They are on two different ends of the spectrum really.
posted on 31/1/13
I love this comparison with Cantona Eric assaulted a fan, Hazard tried to retrieve the ball from a ball boy
...............
I love this blind devotion to your player (bit like the dips with Suarez) and your utter deviation from the facts.
Eric assaulted a fan, Hazard kicked a ball boy .
Now, that has corrected your error.
posted on 31/1/13
Jesus...
posted on 31/1/13
United still sore after they missed out with Hazard and settled for Kagawa
..............
Not really. I had never seen Hazard play when you bought him, and I have not been overly impressed by what I have seen since. Neither have I with Kagawa by the way.
.............
A sensible decision by the FA, no need for a lengthy ban
....................
I agree with that to a degree. Probably a six game ban would have been about right. My big problem was the lenght of the Cantona ban.
posted on 31/1/13
comment by Suso The Magician (U11770)
posted 50 minutes ago
hazard deserves a dry slap
=====================
Yet another poor dipper the education system let slip through its fingers
Page 1 of 4