He should sell to Ken Bates for £1.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
i would prefer if he would change his role at the club, allow professionals to do there job without interference.
In an ideal world the club would look to past chelsea footballers to work in the back room positions and we would bring in a quality manager who would be allowed to develope chelsea.
I really think Roman has taken the club as far as he can running it in its present model.
SOMETHING must change , its only a matter of time Roman has invested over 1 bln and the club still has no sustainable management on and off the pitch, whtas he going to do put another 1bln and still have the same situation in 10 yrs time, ?
I hope not !
While I understand the frustration I totally disagree. Loyalty
Why do people on here make articles like this? Its really embarrassing.
What a dcik you really are OP.
Roman is an excellent owner.He has his faults but he's better than the rest.
The op has a point, all you need is to ditch the russian and find an even richer benefactor.
Saint Mal, to answer your question....people make articles such as this, because people have opinions, ideas and questions to ask.
Moreover, my question is not far-fetched...it's a possibilty!
http://www.ja606.co.uk/complaints/addComplaint/comment/6542488
Sentiments like this, and people wonder why chelsea have earned zero respect from the footballing public for its recent achievements.
Maybe if this state of the art academy produced 1 first team regular the club wouldn't be so reliant on foreign wealth.
Open your eyes, 99% of clubs have it far worse.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
I know every club has these sort of fans.
But I have seen a growing momentum in this notion that any new owner must be a sheikh. It's ridiculous.
To echo a previous point on this thread, the owner merely needs to allow his professional staff to scout talent and coach/ harmonise the squad.
You could argue at least the sheikhs are putting money in to the game which is better than owners hell bent on taking money from it...
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
should Roman sell...if any buyer($)?
Page 1 of 1
posted on 2/2/13
I like Roman.
posted on 2/2/13
Please shut up.
posted on 2/2/13
He should sell to Ken Bates for £1.
posted on 2/2/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 2/2/13
posted on 2/2/13
NO I like uncle Roman.
posted on 2/2/13
i would prefer if he would change his role at the club, allow professionals to do there job without interference.
In an ideal world the club would look to past chelsea footballers to work in the back room positions and we would bring in a quality manager who would be allowed to develope chelsea.
I really think Roman has taken the club as far as he can running it in its present model.
SOMETHING must change , its only a matter of time Roman has invested over 1 bln and the club still has no sustainable management on and off the pitch, whtas he going to do put another 1bln and still have the same situation in 10 yrs time, ?
I hope not !
posted on 2/2/13
While I understand the frustration I totally disagree. Loyalty
posted on 2/2/13
ffp
posted on 2/2/13
Why do people on here make articles like this? Its really embarrassing.
posted on 2/2/13
What a dcik you really are OP.
Roman is an excellent owner.He has his faults but he's better than the rest.
posted on 2/2/13
The op has a point, all you need is to ditch the russian and find an even richer benefactor.
posted on 2/2/13
Saint Mal, to answer your question....people make articles such as this, because people have opinions, ideas and questions to ask.
Moreover, my question is not far-fetched...it's a possibilty!
posted on 2/2/13
http://www.ja606.co.uk/complaints/addComplaint/comment/6542488
posted on 2/2/13
DTM
posted on 2/2/13
I love Roman.
posted on 2/2/13
Sentiments like this, and people wonder why chelsea have earned zero respect from the footballing public for its recent achievements.
Maybe if this state of the art academy produced 1 first team regular the club wouldn't be so reliant on foreign wealth.
Open your eyes, 99% of clubs have it far worse.
posted on 2/2/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 2/2/13
@saint
posted on 3/2/13
I know every club has these sort of fans.
But I have seen a growing momentum in this notion that any new owner must be a sheikh. It's ridiculous.
To echo a previous point on this thread, the owner merely needs to allow his professional staff to scout talent and coach/ harmonise the squad.
posted on 3/2/13
You could argue at least the sheikhs are putting money in to the game which is better than owners hell bent on taking money from it...
Page 1 of 1