There's no way of knowing so might as well gamble. I think Wolfie would agree.

Every game is a gamble with our confidence at present so agree, why not and there is still enough 'experience' in the line up

http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=x4GBiSIGvO4&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3Dx4GBiSIGvO4&gl=GB

To illustrate a point !

Its clear the shower of garbage we have persevered with are devoid of any kind of ability they once had, so may as well try out something new.

But let's keep all the negative fans.

doherty v foley - no, not just yet
davis v henry - yes, every time
cassidy/siggy v doyle - 442 maybe. 451, no
batth v RJ/berrra - i'd rather have batth on his own than RJ or berra.

batth & the pizzaboy v RJ/berra - yes please

I've not seen enough of the younger players to comment Floyd, but one general comment regarding selection:

We have to trust the manager to make the right decisions. He sees them consistently and has them evaluated by his team. He knows their strengths, weaknesses, mental state and confidence levels and maturity. We know none of this.
Despite calling for Stale when his 'time was up' I still had more confidence in his selection of the team than us amateurs.
We all have our opinions on players but we should have more confidence that DS and his team know which players to choose andd the time to 'blood the youngsters'.

True but pressure and desperation in a manager can lead to panic, poor decisions and short termism.

We need decisions to be taken for the long term benefit of the club, which might mean giving some (not all) more youth a chance.

I would play davis before Henry, and I would play Baath before Berra, Hell I would play me before Berra and I'm 48 and about to get 2 new knees. He doesn't like to wait for the end of the match to swap shirts

But the refs hardly penalise him for it Beer.