Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Circular argument with no end begins again

it's not the clubs debt

and you're asking us to get the basics right curly

or is it it's not the clubs debt any longer

Businesses can shed debt. The same happens if a CVA is agreed - and a number of clubs have been involved with that (some of them more than once). It's how company law works. If anybody genuinely doesn't like how company law works they should make representations to the government.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Circular argument with no end begins again

Correction
Circular argument with no end begins again and just keeps on going!

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

it is the debt of the company that formally ran the club

Don't recall ANY reference to the 'company' when sir Minty was splashing someone else dosh

Curly, ffs man wise up. That's the point. Your 'facts' are what you believe to be the truth. The others' 'truth' is their belief. Nae chance of listening or rational debate is the consequence

So I guess the question is Curly - why did Rangers/Whyte/Murray/whoeveryafeckinwant not pay the tax that was due?
Was it because they could not afford to, and thus entered administration? Were they not able to do so because operating costs were too high? Was their largest operating cost player wages?

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

My guess is Whyte was trying to get the club basically for nothing. I also guess that he was hoping the big tax case would be wrapped up much sooner, one way or the other. He didn't have the funds in place to run the club. Though costs could have been cut e.g. players could have been sold, bringing in fees at the same time.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Am I right in saying Southampton have paid a fee for Davis? If so which of the clubs is entitled to that money?

Well, Southampton aren't entitled to it.

But seriously, haven't the SFA or SPL held onto that money?

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Good news TRS is being so widely read..

I had only read about a fee on here, hadnt seen it anywhere else.

how's it a disgrace curly? by your reckoning that should go to oldco which now doesn't exist hence it should be used to pay former debts

comment by Polbethian Can't fit in the water but i'm managing Alex Hammond's bath (U4211)
posted 30 seconds ago
how's it a disgrace curly? by your reckoning that should go to oldco which now doesn't exist hence it should be used to pay former debts

==

exactly fekn disgrace.

Rangers bumped creditors for millions then deliberately and cynically wound up the business to avoid paying legitimate debts. Tell me if that's incorrect. That's what's embarrassing and shameful for the establishment club. Rangers the bastions of dignity.

Answer me this, why are HMRC not pursuing the club for this debt?

------------------------------------------------

I think you'll find that they are Curly.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Magnum, on the nail mate