well that's just one opinion hooijdonk. Yours is wrong though.
no... I must be wrong too
. . . and I'm wrong yet again. But if Pep, were to miss a game I'd prefer to have the Moose replace him. He's worth keeping though - he probably doesn't cost very much.
lot of people wrong today. Hey ho.
I'd like him to be sold in the summer - useless SoD signing imo
Nobody is ever wrong on here Giddy - They just have different opinions
that what was point Red! Hooijdonk said no, as if he was speaking for everyone.
No Giddy, Hooijdonk just said no meaning he (his view only) didn't agree with you.
he was great at the start of the season when the whole team generally were playing well, but as soon as things turned sour, he didn't have the physical presence to deal with people running at him.
No .....but only if he offers me the job and I refuse to wear short skirts!!!
Giddy - pull your knickers out your crack. You asked if anyone agreed. I said no. Because I don't. Simples.
charming.
Simples?? - Taking this merecat advert a tad too far pal.
He's gone off the boil. He's a tidy little player who can link the midfield and defence. But at times under SoD and AM he seemed to be at the centre of what was going wrong. When we were constantly trying to pass, pass, pass and get nowhere and then the opposition hit it up the other end and score. He is not creative in anyway whatsoever and he also doesn't put very many tackles in. I think he's a better alternative than the pedestrian Greening and possibly better than the inconsistent Moussi who has never impressed me. If Geddy is injured then I'd play Cohen there ahead of both Moussi and Gillet.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Gillet was rarely bad in a defensive role. The issue was he was rarely fantastic enough to make up for his inability to attack. In the modern age of football defensive players have to be just as versed in attacking.
Geddy in the CDM role has been fantastic as both a defensive outfit and an attacking outlet. Gillet could never take part in the attack moves geddy can and his utilization by billy is probably one of the biggest driving changes to the team.
he had a good start to the season he is having a bad run of late IMOi think BD will get the best out of him
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Simon Gillett
Page 1 of 1
posted on 24/2/13
no
posted on 24/2/13
well that's just one opinion hooijdonk. Yours is wrong though.
posted on 24/2/13
no... I must be wrong too
posted on 24/2/13
. . . and I'm wrong yet again. But if Pep, were to miss a game I'd prefer to have the Moose replace him. He's worth keeping though - he probably doesn't cost very much.
posted on 24/2/13
lot of people wrong today. Hey ho.
I'd like him to be sold in the summer - useless SoD signing imo
posted on 24/2/13
Nobody is ever wrong on here Giddy - They just have different opinions
posted on 24/2/13
that what was point Red! Hooijdonk said no, as if he was speaking for everyone.
posted on 24/2/13
No Giddy, Hooijdonk just said no meaning he (his view only) didn't agree with you.
posted on 24/2/13
he was great at the start of the season when the whole team generally were playing well, but as soon as things turned sour, he didn't have the physical presence to deal with people running at him.
posted on 24/2/13
Pep, are you his PA?
posted on 24/2/13
No .....but only if he offers me the job and I refuse to wear short skirts!!!
posted on 24/2/13
Giddy - pull your knickers out your crack. You asked if anyone agreed. I said no. Because I don't. Simples.
posted on 24/2/13
charming.
Simples?? - Taking this merecat advert a tad too far pal.
posted on 24/2/13
He's gone off the boil. He's a tidy little player who can link the midfield and defence. But at times under SoD and AM he seemed to be at the centre of what was going wrong. When we were constantly trying to pass, pass, pass and get nowhere and then the opposition hit it up the other end and score. He is not creative in anyway whatsoever and he also doesn't put very many tackles in. I think he's a better alternative than the pedestrian Greening and possibly better than the inconsistent Moussi who has never impressed me. If Geddy is injured then I'd play Cohen there ahead of both Moussi and Gillet.
posted on 24/2/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 24/2/13
Gillet was rarely bad in a defensive role. The issue was he was rarely fantastic enough to make up for his inability to attack. In the modern age of football defensive players have to be just as versed in attacking.
Geddy in the CDM role has been fantastic as both a defensive outfit and an attacking outlet. Gillet could never take part in the attack moves geddy can and his utilization by billy is probably one of the biggest driving changes to the team.
posted on 25/2/13
he had a good start to the season he is having a bad run of late IMOi think BD will get the best out of him
Page 1 of 1