or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 795823 comments are related to an article called:

THE Arsenal Thread

Page 26219 of 31833

posted on 9/6/22

was he grime?

posted on 9/6/22

He was:

Mad Gerald
Flashheart
Richie
Fred
Rick

Never a grime tho he did read the Grimm fairy tales

comment by Teebs (U1060)

posted on 9/6/22

any news?

posted on 9/6/22

Providing bissouma isn't going to jail, we have to go in for him.

Better than all our MF players by a country mile

posted on 9/6/22

Yeah providing he isn't going to jail aye

posted on 9/6/22

[Charles Watts] Guendouzi's (£9m) exit to Marseille is now imminent. Jesus & Tielemans the priority targets. Their futures will be clearer after the internationals. Arsenal hold an interest in Zinchenko and Richarlison. The club like Osimhen but are aware that agreeing a deal would be very difficult

https://www.goal.com/en/news/guendouzi-arsenal-exit-imminent-marseille-jesus-tielemans/bltbe9bcb962356c871

posted on 9/6/22

RICHY

posted on 9/6/22

2 strikers.
1 CM

I hope its 2 CMs but i think that will depend on whether there are any takers for Xhaka.

posted on 9/6/22

comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 6 hours, 48 minutes ago
#Heardle #104

🔇⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️

https://www.heardle.app

Sounds more like DJs pop music
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu

posted on 9/6/22

comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted 3 hours, 22 minutes ago
Release clauses are not enforceable in UK. So there is no point of them and its made up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What is this mess?? Of course release clauses are enforcable.

Suarez never had a release clause, he had a clause that if met meant he was allowed to talk to a club. Liverpool broke that, but Suarez didn't take it further.

posted on 9/6/22

posted on 9/6/22

£9m for a french international midfielder

"arteta has done it again"

posted on 9/6/22

comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 1 hour, 36 minutes ago
He was:

Mad Gerald
Flashheart
Richie
Fred
Rick

Never a grime tho he did read the Grimm fairy tales
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And Alan B'Stard
And Gregs dad in Man Down.

posted on 9/6/22

FACKING HATE GREG DAVIES

posted on 9/6/22

THATS DJ'S DAWD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

posted on 9/6/22

SHAME 🛎️

posted on 9/6/22

comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted 3 hours, 22 minutes ago
Release clauses are not enforceable in UK. So there is no point of them and its made up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What is this mess?? Of course release clauses are enforcable.

Suarez never had a release clause, he had a clause that if met meant he was allowed to talk to a club. Liverpool broke that, but Suarez didn't take it further.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.espn.com/soccer/english-premier-league/story/1734832/liverpool-chief-john-w-henry-admits-luis-suarez-did-have-release-clause

posted on 9/6/22

"Luis Suarez is the top scorer in the English Premier League which is arguably the top soccer league in the world," Henry said.

"And he had a buy-out clause -- I don’t know what degree I should go into this - but he had a buy-out clause of 40 million pounds -- more than $60 million.

"So Arsenal, one of our prime rivals this year, they offered 40,000,001 pounds for him and triggered his buy-out clause.

"But what we’ve found over the years is that contracts don’t seem to mean a lot in England -- actually not in England, in world football.

posted on 9/6/22

John Henry was giving it the billy big bollox
“We got information that showed us what was negotiated between Liverpool and the player, and in our internal conversations decided that the clause was meaningless, that it was not a buy-out and it didn’t obligate Liverpool to do anything apart from have a conversation.

“So, whoever agreed to that clause in the Suarez camp was being less than clever because it was never a buy-out. What there was, was an obligation to discuss a transfer if a threshold was met and that threshold was £40m.”

Law added: “Now, we didn’t know if Liverpool received an offer of £40m whether they would say, 'that’s not more than £40m'. We could have gone with £45m, but the point is we knew there was never a buy-out.

“So, it was never going to be a bid of £40m+1, it was always going to be the start of a negotiation.”

posted on 9/6/22

DJ AND J99 UP A TREE

NONCING

posted on 9/6/22

It's obviously dependent on the wording of the contract/clause

https://inews.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-release-clauses-explained-football-chris-wood-newcastle-move-1399802

posted on 9/6/22

comment by We Demolished Highbury For This? (U3245)
posted less than a minute ago
DJ AND J99 UP A TREE

NONCING
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Noncing the tree?

posted on 9/6/22

Sorry but I take JW Henry's word for it. Its his lawyers who drew up the contract. He called it a buy out clause so thats what I believe it was.

posted on 9/6/22

comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by We Demolished Highbury For This? (U3245)
posted less than a minute ago
DJ AND J99 UP A TREE

NONCING
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Noncing the tree?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
branches will be broken

posted on 9/6/22

comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted 2 minutes ago
Sorry but I take JW Henry's word for it. Its his lawyers who drew up the contract. He called it a buy out clause so thats what I believe it was.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You believe the guy who admitted he lied in the first place and said he could see the front 3 of Sterling, Suarez and Sturridge at Liverpool for many years?

Page 26219 of 31833

Sign in if you want to comment