or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 790037 comments are related to an article called:

THE Arsenal Thread

Page 31574 of 31602

posted 4 days, 10 hours ago

comment by Snooker_49 (U10665)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by T-BAD (U11806)
posted 13 minutes ago
Yeah i thought it was a pen but Chelsea should have also been down to 10 based on the Saliba call
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anyone got a replay for that? I didn't see it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Looks five comments above, Snooky

posted 4 days, 10 hours ago

comment by Castor Troy (U8700)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 14 minutes ago
Should we appeal the Saliba red card?

Tosin situation today use as a leverage?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If it means he will get an extra game ban then hell no
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do they have the bawls?

posted 4 days, 10 hours ago

comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Castor Troy (U8700)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 14 minutes ago
Should we appeal the Saliba red card?

Tosin situation today use as a leverage?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If it means he will get an extra game ban then hell no
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do they have the bawls?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No chance of it being overturned

posted 4 days, 10 hours ago

So nothing to lose. Just try it.

posted 4 days, 10 hours ago

comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 48 seconds ago
So nothing to lose. Just try it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Does he get an extra ban if its not overturned?

posted 4 days, 10 hours ago

Don´t know but would fit in in the category of silly rules.

posted 4 days, 10 hours ago

No, extra game ban for "frivolous" appeals was got rid of a long, long time ago.

comment by Tu Meke (U3732)

posted 4 days, 10 hours ago

comment by Castor Troy (U8700)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 14 minutes ago
Should we appeal the Saliba red card?

Tosin situation today use as a leverage?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If it means he will get an extra game ban then hell no
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It's only Preston.

posted 4 days, 10 hours ago

comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 1 hour, 11 minutes ago
https://x.com/adriancoll1/status/1848049039654138021

Delaying the play, missed out a yellow


https://x.com/ThePeakSanti/status/1848040812606836769

One is a red card and one isnt? Strange.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wtf?!

The actualfucuk btw (rather than the sometimes out blown one).


How are people going to try to justify this now?

comment by T-BAD (U11806)

posted 4 days, 10 hours ago

Cos it's funny it's Arsenal.

posted 4 days, 10 hours ago

I didn’t watch the game today. What was the gist of the commentary from those two incidents?

posted 4 days, 10 hours ago

comment by Lexington 125.2 (U8879)
posted less than a minute ago
I didn’t watch the game today. What was the gist of the commentary from those two incidents?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have english commentary on and they hardly talk about the incident in the Liverpool game. They saw no comparison to the Salibas situation.

posted 4 days, 10 hours ago

comment by Lexington 125.2 (U8879)
posted 2 minutes ago
I didn’t watch the game today. What was the gist of the commentary from those two incidents?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike Dean straightaway said the ball was going too wide (was right in Jotas path) and Colwill was covering (was 5 yards behind and would have been further without the holding).

posted 4 days, 10 hours ago

Oh, and pretty sure they said distance was too great.

posted 4 days, 10 hours ago

And the deliberate delaying of the free kick?

posted 4 days, 10 hours ago

comment by Lexington 125.2 (U8879)
posted less than a minute ago
And the deliberate delaying of the free kick?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think they missed out on that.

posted 4 days, 10 hours ago

comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted about a minute ago
comment by Lexington 125.2 (U8879)
posted 2 minutes ago
I didn’t watch the game today. What was the gist of the commentary from those two incidents?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike Dean straightaway said the ball was going too wide (was right in Jotas path) and Colwill was covering (was 5 yards behind and would have been further without the holding).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I notice that Mike Dean still has Gehirnmauke.

posted 4 days, 10 hours ago

comment by Lexington 125.2 (U8879)
posted 1 minute ago
And the deliberate delaying of the free kick?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nothing at all.

posted 4 days, 10 hours ago

comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 28 seconds ago
Oh, and pretty sure they said distance was too great.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But the back pass yesterday from Trossard was nowhere near the Bournemouth waif?

posted 4 days, 10 hours ago

I thought VAR was only meant to intervene in clear and obvious mistakes? The reaction of the MotD commentator last night showed the initial Saliba call was neither clear not obviously incorrect.

posted 4 days, 9 hours ago

You´re absolutely right Lex.

But we had the bad luck that Howard Webb was in the stands to tell the officials to turn the decision into a red card for Saliba.

posted 4 days, 9 hours ago

Exactly, Lex:

Tony Scholes: One of the difficulties around VAR for the last couple of years is the lack of clarity as to when the VAR should or should not intervene.

“Referee’s Call” really is just an introduction of a terminology to make it clear that the initial decision by the on-pitch official is critical. It’s similar to what exists in other sports like cricket and “Umpire’s Call”. The referee’s call should stand unless the VAR, based on readily available evidence, can see without doubt the on-pitch official has made a clear mistake. In the absence of that clear evidence, the referee’s call will stand.


Howard Webb: “Referee’s Call” is important because it helps manage people's expectations. We have situations that split opinion – and VAR can’t always provide definitive answers all the time, because the real world is not always correct or incorrect. So “Referee’s Call” clarifies the process to fans, managers and players – even if they disagree with the decision.

posted 4 days, 9 hours ago

https://x.com/DailyAFC/status/1847692184788652456

Lex watch this. This was the moment when Saliba given the yellow card.

posted 4 days, 9 hours ago

I have noticed, this season in particular, the media and pundits are making a conscious effort not to criticise refs.

posted 4 days, 9 hours ago

Part of the agreement to get Webb on a TV show.

Carragher posted and very quickly deleted a dodgy tweet about Webb.

Page 31574 of 31602

Sign in if you want to comment