Then Admin1 sacked me.
what about the back and crack?

Did the full 606 works on me Tino.

That's another thing - we still have a sports shrink.

What does he do?

Not an awful lot UH.

Herbie, what about all the quotes DS is putting on our official website on a daily basis. The man is also a disaster with his post match remarks.

So Cyp, how long are you going to give DS, given the fact that he has had poor results?

It's no spin either.

He's in front of the cameras and even after he was sacked, he still maintains he liked both the 2 M's. I certainly wouldn't have liked them for sacking me before I could complete my agenda.

No one will tell the whole truth to the media, whether it's to a newspaper reporter or in front of a camera. Why do you think he was prompted to confirm the 80-90%. Even the interviewer didn't believe that figure. If he did, he wouldn't have the question again. Surely you're not that naive.

Lol, don't point out the obvious wolfie.

To even suggest 1% would be way to high, ANY player causing unrest should be dealt with harshly.

Im sure stale was being diplomatic, he already had his vent on norwegian tv.

Somewhere there's a ships' captain looking forward to his next voyage with great trepidation, remembering the haunting admonishments he's received from a certain passenger in previous years, including...

"You've taken us as far as you can"

"Take off your rose-coloured spectacles or we'll hit that iceberg, and then we'll definitely be going down."

"I certainly wouldn't have liked them for sacking me before I could complete my agenda"


After 6 months and 26 games, it's not too much to ask that he had at least started his agenda though is it?

Seafaring, now we are in my domain

Alas my great uncle died on that vessel that hit the iceberg bute.
In another incident my ancester began tucking into a cabin boy after the captain had taken them as far as he could and they spent 34 days adrift.

DS and SS are two peas in Morgan's pot of shìte

I don't get the Stale vs DS debate - they are both rubbish.

Under Stale the team was on a pretty awful run, playing sterile football and there was no sign the much-vaunted possession football that sold the Stale dream. The trajectory was very much downwards after the first 10 games, in which we achieved some fortunate results, and there was zero evidence that this would change any time soon.

Saunders is full of bluster, emotion and enthusiasm in contrast to the cool, calculating Scandinavian but is constantly floundering to find the right formation, tactics and personnel which may give us a chance of getting some results and getting out of this mess. The constant changes are leaving a group of players who are bereft of confidence looking as confused as they did under Stale. No wonder the team has no shape or defined style of play.

Having said that I'm heading up to Molineux tonight to get behind the team, ignore the pointless protest (about what exactly?!) and hope for the best as always.

Stales' agenda was not just for this season or after any amount of games. He was employed to change a style of football that had stagnated for way too long. Unfortunately there were too many players either unwilling or unable to make that transition. Plus the fact he was very annoyed that Fletcher went so late in the transfer window and wasn't able to find a decent replacement.

Stale has gone and it's water under the bridge right now, just like the MM saga.

We should be concentrating on how or if DS can get us out of this mess.

I might go up and protest about the protest.