Raj has been found out and he's seeeeeething

Has anyone else noticed Raj never posts during school hours. He posts either first thing in the morning, or after he's had his tea, up until about 10 o clock (or bed time).

Raj will probably deny all of this, but I'm going to ignore it 'because he would deny it wouldn't he' .

Raj will probably deny all of this, but I'm going to ignore it 'because he would deny it wouldn't he' .


He wouldn't even deny it redman he'd just say your seething and he won. How about it raj can you post during school hours?

Raj the puppet master will be back with his drivel of i'm pulling your strings, but could TOOR now be the puppet master of Raj? Could Raj with all his lies turn out to be Rajnocchino????

ah red man. you do make me laugh.

you are trying to claim that you've not contradicted yourself? i openly admitted that i dont know the tone that your comments are intended and its just my opinion.

you on the other hand are claiming that i cant possibly know for sure the intended tone you're using (true) yet you can definitely know for sure the intended tone that i am using.

theres really not much you can say about that. im sure you'll try to argue it. you always do.

epic fail from the red man.



red man 1

How can you call something you can't see? Anger isn't a visible entity on a forum, and can only be interpreted through tone.

You reading posts in a particular tone, then claiming that person is angry is naive.

Seeing as I'm the one posting the comment. I know the intended tone.

I'm just telling you that you are wrong. I know the tone in which my comments are intended. You don't.

red man 2

I can read the tone of a comment, you can't.

Your unprovoked comment about me 'wetting myself' had an angry tone about it.

The tone in which you posted was an angry one.

kneerash lets make a couple of things clear.

i have constantly discussed the topic of this thread and its not me that dragged it off topic. just because you and others allow yourselves to be wound up by my brilliance does not mean that i set out to annoy you.

thats something you need to learn regarding what makes a wum.

secondly. you were slating people for constantly talking about suarez. i showed a lot of posts where you talk about united. some of them are positive but many of them are not. i proved you were just as obssessed about united as others are about suarez.

i know you wont admit it. thats fine. but to keep joining the thread three months on when the conversation has moved on is a bit pathetic.

although its a funny reminder of your ranting posts that stopped for half hour while you travelled to work and then started again. youd been thinking about your response all the way into work i reckon.

oh one other thing. i havent lied once. if you think you have caught me lying then feel free to share. but you'll only end up being owned again.

it is true to say that I don't post during school hours.

these are otherwise known as work hours.

its quite funny that you guys are trying to use the fact that you have jobs where you can use a forum all day and no one cares as something to mock me with!

Raj

"you on the other hand are claiming that i cant possibly know for sure the intended tone you're using (true) yet you can definitely know for sure the intended tone that i am using."

No I've said you read comments and assume the person is angry. I said you have trouble reading tone in a comment. Not that you 'can't possibly know for sure'. I on the other hand can read tone, and can tell if you are angry or not.

Your comment about me 'wetting myself to know' had an angry tone about it. Why do I know this? Because in the context of the conversation, me asking you a sime question, your response was unprovoked.

Raj

"it is true to say that I don't post during school hours.

these are otherwise known as work hours."

Of course you'd deny it. Doesn't mean it's not true. I'll ignore your protestations, because its what I'd expect.

"I on the other hand can read tone"

oh this gets better.

do you actually believe that?

funny thing is you were right when you said that only you know the intended tone of your comments.

but the same applies to me.

oh bless you red man. this is comedy stuff.

youre right red man I would deny it.

but theres nothing at all that suggests im at school rather than at work. in fact theres probably evidence to the contrary if nothing else.

nice try at being clever but you failed.

any opinion I make I have reasons for.

Raj you jumped into something that didn't concern you and posted a link, no comments so right there is a lie.

I've just caught you again wum

I posted a copy of the summary of your comments kneerash. which was all that was needed to prove me right.

but theres nothing at all that suggests im at school rather than at work.
--------------------

Well, there is the stuff you write on here. That would certainly suggest you are of school age.

id say the same about you guys robin. some of the stuff that's gone on on this thread - particularly when I am away, has been very childish.

maybe youre using your iphone at the back of a maths lesson.

id say the same about you guys robin
---------------------------

That's because you're 14.

Right raj I've you caught out again

You just said you posted comments I wrote about united and ergo I was obsessed

Here's what you posted it's on page 8 of this thread

------

comment by Raj (U17528)
posted on 12/3/13
Oh look. three in a day



RE: Chicharito vs Carlos Velo
Posted: Nov 8, 2010 | Last reply: Nov 9, 2010 | 30 comments

RE: Fergie Replacement - Mourinho???!!!???
Posted: Nov 8, 2010 | Last reply: Nov 8, 2010 | 24 comments

RE: Manchester United 5 - 5 Manchester City
Posted: Nov 8, 2010 | Last reply: Nov 8, 2010 | 9 comments
Add Comment  |  Complain about this Comment
comment by Raj (U17528)
posted on 12/3/13
Oh look, two more. so thats five comments about united on just one 606 page.



RE: Rooney? Would you?
Posted: Oct 21, 2010 | Last reply: Oct 22, 2010 | 15 comments

RE: United fans and their pearlers
Posted: Oct 22, 2010 | Last reply: Oct 22, 2010 | 8 comments

----

So two posts one after another, you see any comments there? Cause I'm pretty sure they are articles I commented on, not comments I posted just articles I commented on.

You wanted proof of you lying on this thread then there it is right there. Game over wum shown up with actual proof.

And you get joy that I came back on a thread when I got to work? Well I was in an office on my own and I was on ja every night I was in work.

So it goes from "I posted comments" to "I posted a summary of comments"

Scurrying back trying to cover your tracks after you realized you'd landed yourself in it.

Done with proof raj game over wum child

I can't believe this is still going.

FatJanMolby (U4297)

Three more months and the works of Shakespeare will have been written.

actually kneerash i said i showed the posts.

i clearly remember what i posted and i knew that this meant showed that youd posted rather than copying and pasting the whole post.

if you were not clear on this then consider yourself corrected.

i clearly remember what i posted and i knew that this meant showed that youd posted rather than copying and pasting the whole post.
-----------------------------

Just for clarification

-----

secondly. you were slating people for constantly talking about suarez. i showed a lot of posts where you talk about united. some of them are positive but many of them are not. i proved you were just as obssessed about united as others are about suarez.

----

Whetes the posts raj? This is very fickle I'll admit but you challenged me and I've shown you up as a liar, no posts merely a link to some threads I posted on.

I've never written an article on the united board, I get on fine with the united fans. You're gone lad game over wum I "win"