There is however no reason to even comment on why 10 weeks after losing Forster Celtic have no replacement nor any in site.
+++++
We trailed a keeper he failed...
We would have liked to have got Shay Given but weren't in th running...
We made ONE bid for Forster which was refused.
We know when to take a hint
Whytie valued the player at £1m
Now so why is he now willing to pay £2.8m for him?
It just sums up Rangers transfer policy under whytie
Here's a hint TCD, zaluska plays in goal for yous next year,you'll lose the league Maybe somebody should drap this hint to Pistol Pete
chaz - cos thats what blackburn are offering. Not 2m. So if they didnt accept 2m from rovers, then its safe to say rangers wouldnt have got him for 2m.
Like you keep bumbling on that we would have. We wouldnt!
Sign in if you want to comment
Another goodwillie bid
Page 4 of 4
posted on 2/8/11
There is however no reason to even comment on why 10 weeks after losing Forster Celtic have no replacement nor any in site.
+++++
We trailed a keeper he failed...
We would have liked to have got Shay Given but weren't in th running...
We made ONE bid for Forster which was refused.
We know when to take a hint
posted on 2/8/11
*trialled
posted on 2/8/11
Whytie valued the player at £1m
Now so why is he now willing to pay £2.8m for him?
It just sums up Rangers transfer policy under whytie
posted on 2/8/11
Here's a hint TCD, zaluska plays in goal for yous next year,you'll lose the league Maybe somebody should drap this hint to Pistol Pete
posted on 2/8/11
chaz - cos thats what blackburn are offering. Not 2m. So if they didnt accept 2m from rovers, then its safe to say rangers wouldnt have got him for 2m.
Like you keep bumbling on that we would have. We wouldnt!
Page 4 of 4