Thought you had got banned dingalinglong
jovetic giovinco and very strong midfield player
Gibbs > Monreal. Walcott should be waaaaaay higher. Gervnho waaaay lower. Diaby waaaaay lower. Mert higher.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Read as far as "3 Diaby"...
Utterly deluded.
Read as far as "3 Diaby"...
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ditto.
diaby is the best french player, patrick vieira says he is superior to him. without injuries he will be the best
Squillaci should be far lower.
without injuries he will be the best
-----------------------------------------------------------
Better forget that then.
PS if you say he's the best French player, why is he below Kos?
"without injuries he will be the best"
------------
Move along now... nothing to see here.
Read as far as "3 Diaby"...
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ditto.
----
Me too.
it is not necessary to agree with every player. in my opinion diaby is a fantastic player without injuries
But that player/person doesn't exist does he, so why rank him at all, let alone third?
because i said assuming without any injuries
if messi became injured he is still the best player in the world
Because Messi has already achieved great things in his career.
Diaby has achieved nothing other than gaining an extremely healthy bank balance.
Yeah but if he gets injured at the age of 18 and keeps getting injured so he barely plays... then he wouldn't be the best player in the world.
Best players in terms of what? Because if it's talent then no way can you have Arshavin and Rosicky that low down.
Marco Reus on Tomas Rosicky: “He was so unlucky he had bad injuries at Arsenal because, otherwise, he would be one of the world’s best players.”
Yet the OP ranks him 16 places lower than Abou Diaby in the current Arsenal squad.
Arshavin and rosicky play at a low level now. diaby can play at a high level but he is injured
Funny how so many Arsenal supporters think Abou Diaby is SO amazing!
Bet he's glad he's never had to prove them right.
IF you're judging it by how players are playing NOW, then Diaby should be at the bottom as he isn't actually playing now is he?
because if diaby is fit tomorrow he can be in the starting team and with 10 games rhythm he will be a great player and he is 26 years old. i like arshavn and rosicky although they are old and lost some ability
Sign in if you want to comment
best players, in ranking order
Page 1 of 2
posted on 5/4/13
Thought you had got banned dingalinglong
posted on 5/4/13
jovetic giovinco and very strong midfield player
posted on 5/4/13
Gibbs > Monreal. Walcott should be waaaaaay higher. Gervnho waaaay lower. Diaby waaaaay lower. Mert higher.
posted on 5/4/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 5/4/13
Read as far as "3 Diaby"...
Utterly deluded.
posted on 5/4/13
Read as far as "3 Diaby"...
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ditto.
posted on 5/4/13
diaby is the best french player, patrick vieira says he is superior to him. without injuries he will be the best
posted on 5/4/13
Squillaci should be far lower.
posted on 5/4/13
3,2,1
BANNED
posted on 5/4/13
without injuries he will be the best
-----------------------------------------------------------
Better forget that then.
PS if you say he's the best French player, why is he below Kos?
posted on 5/4/13
"without injuries he will be the best"
------------
Move along now... nothing to see here.
posted on 5/4/13
Read as far as "3 Diaby"...
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ditto.
----
Me too.
posted on 5/4/13
it is not necessary to agree with every player. in my opinion diaby is a fantastic player without injuries
posted on 5/4/13
But that player/person doesn't exist does he, so why rank him at all, let alone third?
posted on 5/4/13
because i said assuming without any injuries
posted on 5/4/13
WUM
posted on 5/4/13
if messi became injured he is still the best player in the world
posted on 5/4/13
Because Messi has already achieved great things in his career.
Diaby has achieved nothing other than gaining an extremely healthy bank balance.
posted on 5/4/13
Yeah but if he gets injured at the age of 18 and keeps getting injured so he barely plays... then he wouldn't be the best player in the world.
posted on 5/4/13
Best players in terms of what? Because if it's talent then no way can you have Arshavin and Rosicky that low down.
posted on 5/4/13
Marco Reus on Tomas Rosicky: “He was so unlucky he had bad injuries at Arsenal because, otherwise, he would be one of the world’s best players.”
Yet the OP ranks him 16 places lower than Abou Diaby in the current Arsenal squad.
posted on 5/4/13
Arshavin and rosicky play at a low level now. diaby can play at a high level but he is injured
posted on 5/4/13
Funny how so many Arsenal supporters think Abou Diaby is SO amazing!
Bet he's glad he's never had to prove them right.
posted on 5/4/13
IF you're judging it by how players are playing NOW, then Diaby should be at the bottom as he isn't actually playing now is he?
posted on 5/4/13
because if diaby is fit tomorrow he can be in the starting team and with 10 games rhythm he will be a great player and he is 26 years old. i like arshavn and rosicky although they are old and lost some ability
Page 1 of 2