or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 20 comments are related to an article called:

WHICH IS WORSE?

Page 1 of 1

posted on 22/4/13

Luis.

Chewis Suarez is the 'unacceptable face of football'.

posted on 22/4/13

Football is a contact sport.

A bad tackle is part of football, and always has been.

A handball is part of football, and always has been.

Biting is not part of football, and has only over been seen on few occasions.

posted on 22/4/13

What kind of response do you honestly expect? It's rather embarrassing viewing Liverpool fans defend such an absolute sc<mbag. Suarez is a brilliant player but you cannot defend his several actions for various clubs and his country, from self confessed racism, to biting opponents while at Ajax, to biting Ivanovic while at Liverpool, constant diving, cheating Africa out of their first ever semi final participant in a World Cup and punching an opponent while playing fo Uruguay. Completely unacceptable and if he wasn't at Liverpool, you would be equally as condemnatory.

posted on 22/4/13

Hardly say it's a cheeky nibble, you can see his anger in his face as he opens his mouth as wide as it can to clamp down on his arm. He would make a great zombie actor.

Babies, animals and the insane bite.

posted on 22/4/13

I find it hilarious that fans everywhere are spouting drivel that Liverpool fans are defending Suarez. Nobody has defended what he did so wind it in and stop whining. You can't defend the indefensible.

posted on 22/4/13

Yes, but look at this article TOOR, what has a tackle got to do with what Suarez did? People should stop using other incidents and make out like its nothing wrong with what Suarez did..

posted on 22/4/13

Nobody made out Suarez did nothing wrong. Somebody created an article asking which incident was worse and like most others, you ignored the topic.

posted on 22/4/13

A bite, a dive and a punch. How dies he find time to score goals?

That's a lot in one season.

posted on 22/4/13

Yeah because the maximum time of 1 minute would take up a lot of his goalscoring time doing those things.

posted on 22/4/13

Whose defending him? Some on here have just been spouting this rubbish when i haven't really seen anyone defending his actions.

posted on 22/4/13

Haha.....

He is just picked on by the media.....who keep reporting.on his antics.

posted on 22/4/13

But at last he has taken the focus on pepe and his assault.

posted on 22/4/13

Pepe and his assault?

posted on 22/4/13

fellaini
Have you been dabling lad?

posted on 22/4/13

Football is a contact sport.

A bad tackle is part of football, and always has been.

A handball is part of football, and always has been.

Biting is not part of football, and has only over been seen on few occasions.
_______

posted on 22/4/13

How can you talk about Henry's handball in an article defending Suarez?! He did exactly the same thing against Ghana! Hilarious levels of stupidity.

posted on 22/4/13

But of the three scenarios, which has the greater material consequence?

posted on 22/4/13

Another fool saying somebody is defending Suarez. Read the article and comment on topic, it's not difficult.

posted on 22/4/13

Okay, I stand corrected, an article not condemning Suarez for biting an opponent, which is unquestionably a disgusting action to take on a football pitch.

And on commenting on topic, fair enough. Suarez's bite was by far the worst of the three. Not that the other 2 weren't disgraceful.

posted on 22/4/13

Don't you think there have been enough articles condemning Suarez?

Don't you understand material consequence?

It's seems you aren't intelligent enough to hold this debate.

Page 1 of 1

Sign in if you want to comment