Comment deleted by Site Moderator

For a man who set Spurs back at least 10 years because if his spat with Venables, you would think he would be happy Spurs are close to where they perhaps should have always been.

Why can't we just lock Piers and Alan in a room together and throw away the key.

There's absolutely no way Alan Sugar knows how to use Twitter, poor old fool

He is a bit of an idiot though, when we played utd last and de gea made some incredible saves he said 'well that's us winning 2-1 now as we are the better team'

"For a man who set Spurs back at least 10 years because if his spat with Venables"

For a man whose finances saved Spurs from becoming history.

Lord sugar is a yïd

comment by The RDBD (demoted to supporting the team managed by Pep Guardiola) (U1062)
posted 1 minute ago

For a man whose finances saved Spurs from becoming history.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

True But his comments are a joke though

He's an idiot. He looks of any reason to give AVB stick. He has an irrational hatred for the guy.

I don't like having a go at sugar as he did save us. He needs to button it though. He is an idiot

"But his comments are a joke though"

Of course.
They show a fickleness that suggests that football is one business is he is not suited to.

Couple of decent birds on The Apprentice mind

"Couple of decent birds on The Apprentice mind"

Business wise ??
Or in terms of the blah blah about "eye candy" brought in to save the decreasing viewing figures ??

For a man whose finances saved Spurs from becoming history.
========
Because he was the only person interested in buying Spurs...

don't use birds to describe female.

"Because he was the only person interested in buying Spurs"

So he did so for a laugh eh ??

What I don't get is you DONT have to follow or read his tweets that's your choice

So he did so for a laugh eh ??
======
Why "for a laugh"? What is that meant to mean?

The point was he set Spurs back a long time with the way he ran the club, and if another bidder had beaten him to it you may very well have had a far better time of it.

comment by ツ VertongHєиgу ツ (U9129)
posted 1 minute ago
What I don't get is you DONT have to follow or read his tweets that's your choice

----------------------------------------------------------------------

I rarely use Twitter, let alone follow Tweets! I just stumbled across this article

People retweet, Hengy. I don't follow Morgan or Sugar but I tend to get their posts on my timeline a lot.

I have unfollowed people for retweeting these pair of twáts, but the retweets just keep coming

Business wise ??
Or in terms of the blah blah about "eye candy" brought in to save the decreasing viewing figures ??
--------------------------------------------------------------------
the second one.

"The point was he set Spurs back a long time with the way he ran the club, and if another bidder had beaten him to it you may very well have had a far better time of it."

Coulda, shoulda, woulda.

Sandy = Alan Sugar they're so alike

Also I'm pretty sure most of what he says... Someone says on our match thread...

We're all fans and passionate about our club

RDBD, you think the Sugar reign was good for Spurs?

As a hater of the "Sky 4" I would be shocked.

I reckon grandspur is probably the closest to Sir Alan.