20m for Kompany, double that first...... He was unhappy with City under Mancini, well he's not there any more.. great journalism as normal..... Nice bit by Mick Dennis though!!
Twenty million
Dear me that's some poor journalism.
To which of Kompany's end of season comments is the author referring to? x
IF Barca want Vincent company then we will do a deal for him, providing that Lionel Messi comes here in a straight swap, no Messi no deal.
Konpant was unhappy at City under Mancin? I doubt that very much.
He was unhappy about Mancini's comments as regards playing for Belgium rahter than resting after being out 6 + games for his club. However why would he be unhappy at a manager who made him. Lets forget all the daemonisation going on and remember the facts shall we. When VK was bought for city by Hughes he was bought as a defensive midfield player. He played ok but was no great match winner. When RM came he saw Kompanys potential as a CD and moved him there, dropped Kolo and paired him with Lescott and then Nasty. VK owes Mancini his value as a CD so why except for the Belgium comments (I believe Fergies has made similar comments about most of the England players he's had under him) would VK be unhappy with the bloke who made him as a footballer?
Don't believe the papers an there bullsheet!
Fingers still havnt gotten the hang of phone keypads. Bloody dinky letters on them and its hit and miss.
Lee
VK played centre half before he came to City
He was bought by Hamburg from Anderlecht to replace his departing compatriot Daniel van Buyton
And Hughes bought and played him at midfield with Dunne and Ben Haim in CD then Kolo and Lescott. It eas only when RM came he made the transition to CD and got the plaudits he rightly deserved. However it was RM who gave him that opportunity on a regular basis.
True
Probably tells you more about Hughes than RM though?
PP we must be getting Pel as am slipping into spanglish with the eas
Unfortunately not though I cant vouch for my keypad on the old dog and bone.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Tuesday Gossip
Page 1 of 1
posted on 21/5/13
20m for Kompany, double that first...... He was unhappy with City under Mancini, well he's not there any more.. great journalism as normal..... Nice bit by Mick Dennis though!!
posted on 21/5/13
Twenty million
Dear me that's some poor journalism.
posted on 21/5/13
To which of Kompany's end of season comments is the author referring to? x
posted on 21/5/13
IF Barca want Vincent company then we will do a deal for him, providing that Lionel Messi comes here in a straight swap, no Messi no deal.
posted on 21/5/13
Konpant was unhappy at City under Mancin? I doubt that very much.
He was unhappy about Mancini's comments as regards playing for Belgium rahter than resting after being out 6 + games for his club. However why would he be unhappy at a manager who made him. Lets forget all the daemonisation going on and remember the facts shall we. When VK was bought for city by Hughes he was bought as a defensive midfield player. He played ok but was no great match winner. When RM came he saw Kompanys potential as a CD and moved him there, dropped Kolo and paired him with Lescott and then Nasty. VK owes Mancini his value as a CD so why except for the Belgium comments (I believe Fergies has made similar comments about most of the England players he's had under him) would VK be unhappy with the bloke who made him as a footballer?
posted on 21/5/13
Don't believe the papers an there bullsheet!
posted on 21/5/13
Fingers still havnt gotten the hang of phone keypads. Bloody dinky letters on them and its hit and miss.
posted on 21/5/13
Lee
VK played centre half before he came to City
He was bought by Hamburg from Anderlecht to replace his departing compatriot Daniel van Buyton
posted on 21/5/13
And Hughes bought and played him at midfield with Dunne and Ben Haim in CD then Kolo and Lescott. It eas only when RM came he made the transition to CD and got the plaudits he rightly deserved. However it was RM who gave him that opportunity on a regular basis.
posted on 21/5/13
True
Probably tells you more about Hughes than RM though?
posted on 21/5/13
PP we must be getting Pel as am slipping into spanglish with the eas
posted on 21/5/13
You sir are drunk
posted on 21/5/13
Unfortunately not though I cant vouch for my keypad on the old dog and bone.
Page 1 of 1