Suarez does taped interveiw stating how he thinks it best he leaves the club.
Sky Sports and every other news outlet world wide release the one bit where he says that its best he leaves.
The club, not the owners, the club release a statement saying that Luis nor his agent have said anything to the club. The club states the player is not for sale and that the contract should be honoured!
How is that FSG twisting the media?
Next thing you'll be telling us is that mans never been to the moon and Hitler was a side operator for John Henry!
Lucas Leiva...
Think you're talking absolute crap there about FSG mate.
From your thinking, any player that makes headlines in the press has really suffered from some shady media management by their club then.
The English media is renowned for underhand sensationalism like this, they have to, otherwise people don't buy their rags, or worse still stop quoting them so they cease to matter.
That full transcript is far more believeable than the edited shorts that the British media put out.
OP
You need to take a deep breathe and go slow. We are loosing you it seems. This is downright absurd.
It was an external interview so it wasnt ours to disseminate. Local media didnt get it from us. LFC nipped the untruths in the bud with that statement clarifying that reports that he had informed the club he wanted out were false.
Your theories and conclusions are insane. This is worse than ARE, shortlight even that anfield of dreams guy!!!!!
So the clubs mouthpiece at the echo states the comments have come as a suprise to rodgers and ayre (comments that were not actually made) and that does not strike you as strange?
why would a comment about leaving that was never made, be a surprise to either of them?
From your thinking, any player that makes headlines in the press has really suffered from some shady media management by their club then.
No, but there are instances where the club use the media to manipulate their own agenda. if you think that does not happen then you are very naive.
bottom line is, FSG are not putting any more money into the club. suarez is seen as the ideal kitty booster and rodgers will be given a portion of the suarez fee.
people are talking about £25m plus sales....if you think they will hand over £25m plus potentially £50m and another £20-30m from carroll, skrtel, coates, you need to give your head a wobble
What are you going on about?
He said on tv during an interveiw that he thinks its best for him to go. He said the manager knew how he felt, the club then released a statement to deny that Suarez had confirmed his desire to leave Liverpool and that he is not for sale and is expected to fulfill his contractual obligations!
How that conforms to the club not making funds available to the manager and there for including the worlds media in to a conspiracy theory of humongous proportions is incredible!
<wow>
The pant wetting has begun early today.
Yesterday we had fans who have defended Luis vociferously, doing a 180 degree turn and calling him a .
Today we have this.
Has Raj taken over your account?
How would Ayre and co know what comments were ACTUALLY made?
doubt they subscribe to Uruguayan TV!
ok, if the club had no real intention of letting suarez leave, why was he removed from all of the promotional material for the new kit?
our biggest asset and biggest shirt seller by a mile, removed from the adrvetising.
look on the OS, sturridge and gerrard.
look outside anfield, gerrard, sturridge and johnson!
in the current climate, where FSG want to grow the commercial income to its max, do you think they would just forget to leave of off our most marketable player?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
ok, if the club had no real intention of letting suarez leave, why was he removed from all of the promotional material for the new kit?
our biggest asset and biggest shirt seller by a mile, removed from the adrvetising.
look on the OS, sturridge and gerrard.
look outside anfield, gerrard, sturridge and johnson!
in the current climate, where FSG want to grow the commercial income to its max, do you think they would just forget to leave of off our most marketable player?
--------------
That is an interesting point.
However, perhaps they are pushing the high profile England players in England. In other countries perhaps other players are being used to promote the club in different markets/cultures. I don't know.
His name is still available on shirts!
This has to be the most idiotic article I have ever read.
The thing is, if John Henry and FSG are that powerful that they control the worlds media (like the evil head master) why hav'nt we signed Ian Evatt yet?
FSG developed a manchurian candidate 'bite command' and waited for the right moment to trigger it.
The gave Ivanovic £500k to say "bacon butties" and the sleeper awoke.
Unfortunately for Ivanovic they didn't tell him he was the target
FSG had scientists strap Suarez' eyes open and for a week forced him to watch projected clips onto a white wall, of blacks beating up white children, right before the United game, in which he racially abused Evra.
"ok, if the club had no real intention of letting suarez leave, why was he removed from all of the promotional material for the new kit?"
===============
Suarez has been moved from promotional material because of his ban.
The owners felt it would be less controversial and more sponsor friendly at this time not to include him.
Think the OP has finished with the poor wum article / disastrous serious article.
Suarez has been moved from promotional material because of his ban.
The owners felt it would be less controversial and more sponsor friendly at this time not to include him.
--------
good point
Sign in if you want to comment
The club have played everybody for idiots!
Page 4 of 4
posted on 1/6/13
Suarez does taped interveiw stating how he thinks it best he leaves the club.
Sky Sports and every other news outlet world wide release the one bit where he says that its best he leaves.
The club, not the owners, the club release a statement saying that Luis nor his agent have said anything to the club. The club states the player is not for sale and that the contract should be honoured!
How is that FSG twisting the media?
Next thing you'll be telling us is that mans never been to the moon and Hitler was a side operator for John Henry!
posted on 1/6/13
Lucas Leiva...
Think you're talking absolute crap there about FSG mate.
From your thinking, any player that makes headlines in the press has really suffered from some shady media management by their club then.
The English media is renowned for underhand sensationalism like this, they have to, otherwise people don't buy their rags, or worse still stop quoting them so they cease to matter.
That full transcript is far more believeable than the edited shorts that the British media put out.
posted on 1/6/13
OP
You need to take a deep breathe and go slow. We are loosing you it seems. This is downright absurd.
It was an external interview so it wasnt ours to disseminate. Local media didnt get it from us. LFC nipped the untruths in the bud with that statement clarifying that reports that he had informed the club he wanted out were false.
Your theories and conclusions are insane. This is worse than ARE, shortlight even that anfield of dreams guy!!!!!
posted on 1/6/13
So the clubs mouthpiece at the echo states the comments have come as a suprise to rodgers and ayre (comments that were not actually made) and that does not strike you as strange?
why would a comment about leaving that was never made, be a surprise to either of them?
From your thinking, any player that makes headlines in the press has really suffered from some shady media management by their club then.
No, but there are instances where the club use the media to manipulate their own agenda. if you think that does not happen then you are very naive.
bottom line is, FSG are not putting any more money into the club. suarez is seen as the ideal kitty booster and rodgers will be given a portion of the suarez fee.
people are talking about £25m plus sales....if you think they will hand over £25m plus potentially £50m and another £20-30m from carroll, skrtel, coates, you need to give your head a wobble
posted on 1/6/13
What are you going on about?
He said on tv during an interveiw that he thinks its best for him to go. He said the manager knew how he felt, the club then released a statement to deny that Suarez had confirmed his desire to leave Liverpool and that he is not for sale and is expected to fulfill his contractual obligations!
How that conforms to the club not making funds available to the manager and there for including the worlds media in to a conspiracy theory of humongous proportions is incredible!
<wow>
posted on 1/6/13
The pant wetting has begun early today.
Yesterday we had fans who have defended Luis vociferously, doing a 180 degree turn and calling him a .
Today we have this.
posted on 1/6/13
Has Raj taken over your account?
posted on 1/6/13
How would Ayre and co know what comments were ACTUALLY made?
doubt they subscribe to Uruguayan TV!
posted on 1/6/13
ok, if the club had no real intention of letting suarez leave, why was he removed from all of the promotional material for the new kit?
our biggest asset and biggest shirt seller by a mile, removed from the adrvetising.
look on the OS, sturridge and gerrard.
look outside anfield, gerrard, sturridge and johnson!
in the current climate, where FSG want to grow the commercial income to its max, do you think they would just forget to leave of off our most marketable player?
posted on 1/6/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 1/6/13
ok, if the club had no real intention of letting suarez leave, why was he removed from all of the promotional material for the new kit?
our biggest asset and biggest shirt seller by a mile, removed from the adrvetising.
look on the OS, sturridge and gerrard.
look outside anfield, gerrard, sturridge and johnson!
in the current climate, where FSG want to grow the commercial income to its max, do you think they would just forget to leave of off our most marketable player?
--------------
That is an interesting point.
However, perhaps they are pushing the high profile England players in England. In other countries perhaps other players are being used to promote the club in different markets/cultures. I don't know.
posted on 1/6/13
His name is still available on shirts!
posted on 1/6/13
This has to be the most idiotic article I have ever read.
posted on 1/6/13
The thing is, if John Henry and FSG are that powerful that they control the worlds media (like the evil head master) why hav'nt we signed Ian Evatt yet?
posted on 1/6/13
FSG developed a manchurian candidate 'bite command' and waited for the right moment to trigger it.
The gave Ivanovic £500k to say "bacon butties" and the sleeper awoke.
Unfortunately for Ivanovic they didn't tell him he was the target
posted on 1/6/13
FSG had scientists strap Suarez' eyes open and for a week forced him to watch projected clips onto a white wall, of blacks beating up white children, right before the United game, in which he racially abused Evra.
posted on 1/6/13
"ok, if the club had no real intention of letting suarez leave, why was he removed from all of the promotional material for the new kit?"
===============
Suarez has been moved from promotional material because of his ban.
The owners felt it would be less controversial and more sponsor friendly at this time not to include him.
posted on 1/6/13
Think the OP has finished with the poor wum article / disastrous serious article.
posted on 1/6/13
Suarez has been moved from promotional material because of his ban.
The owners felt it would be less controversial and more sponsor friendly at this time not to include him.
--------
good point
Page 4 of 4