This is mind-numbingly boring.<yawn>

Looks like ye coulda done better wi yer big comeback,mex

Just leave them alone with their new team/club/corporate wrapper.

ffs they've been slapped down and they were told they were wrong and yet still they keep at it.

pacific quay flat earth massive

shouldn't be too hard too convince their bosses that there's an agenda at play after this.

Pacific Quay---------Pacific Shelf

Could there be a connection?

I wonder.

This coz the complaint was upheld, Mex?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-22951447

It rejected parts of the complaints which alleged that use of the terms was a result of "anti-Rangers bias".

Not completely, Ath.

hopefully the polis will be speaking to them soon about the theft of productions from the tax case.

A BBC spokesman said.....'No dumb berrz were harmed in the production of this drama......well not intentionally at least...'

A BBC spokesman said ......."Would you like to see some puppies?"

The complain was upheld. The BBC used "inaccurate" lamguae in failing to differentiate between the holding company & club.

You can remain in denial all you like. But ever BBC sports article from now on will differentiate from Oldco/, Newco and the club which is a separate entity and has existed since 1872.

If you don't believe me. Read the full report. I have

Kick in the bàlls for their poor editorial standards.

It rejected parts of the complaints which alleged that use of the terms was a result of "anti-Rangers bias
==
No. They were unproven

Esc go and ask a shareholder of the dead Rangers ma man.....holding company

Mex

Still in denial eh

It's jist you, mentally ill phill & the 78

When....
by MexicanShoeMaker...tiene ojos azules (U5848) 27 September 2012
COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE
..Rangers are revealed to have been cheating on an industrial scale should they be expelled from Scottish Footbal sine die?


==

I preferred the old Mex

I'm sick of this pash....it's really easy, so I'll help you out guys.
Look at these two pictures:
http://slatford.co.uk/Pictures%20of%20Cars/MG/1954-MG-TF-fa-black-lr.jpg

Lovely, classy, stylish, cool.

or this:

http://www.drivearabia.com/news/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/SAIC-MG-550-18T-Roewe.jpg

Pile of total plastic, fake, chinese cr@p.

Both legally allowed to be called MG.

Now leave it at that.

JB I couldn't car(e) less

I preferred the old Mex

----------------------

Me too

<malfeasancesmiley>

Ooooft

Why when this came out did Mex not post a thread?
The thoughts and conclusion from a legal expert and even the fat sweaty Rangers hating lawyer did not seek to argue.

Instead he waits till the folk who make Eastenders and Only and Excuse have their say



It will be recalled that in Article 2 "Club" is defined in terms of "the undertaking of an association football club", and in Rule I1 it is defined in terms of an association football club which is, for the time being, eligible to participate in the League, and includes the owner and operator of such Club. Taking these definitions together, the SPL and its members have provided, by contract, that a Club is an undertaking which is capable of being owned and operated. While it no doubt depends on individual circumstances what exactly is comprised in the undertaking of any particular Club, it would at the least comprise its name, the contracts with its players, its manager and other staff, and its ground, even though these may change from time to time. In common speech a Club is treated as a recognisable entity which is capable of being owned and operated, and which continues in existence despite its transfer to another owner and operator. In legal terms, it appears to us to be no different from any other undertaking which is capable of being carried on, bought and sold. This is not to say that a Club has legal personality, separate from and additional to the legal personality of its owner and operator. We are satisfied that it does not, and Mr McKenzie did not seek to argue otherwise.

The Duke....lovely post, but, I'll try again....

Look at these two pictures:
http://slatford.co.uk/Pictures%20of%20Cars/MG/1954-MG-TF-fa-black-lr.jpg

Lovely, classy, stylish, cool.

or this:

http://www.drivearabia.com/news/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/SAIC-MG-550-18T-Roewe.jpg

Pile of total plastic, fake, chinese cr@p.

Both legally allowed to be called MG.

Now leave it at that.

Is that no whit a said

Well, not exactly. What I'm trying to say is that no-one is right or wrong on this.

It's just a matter of perspective.

Celtic people will point out that you can call yourselves Rangers legally but everyone knows you are not the same....really.

Rangers guys can point out that you can call yourselves Rangers legally, and you are the same really.

Moral values are not mine to wield.

It's just a matter of perspective.

==

Its really not though....

HMRC
UEFA
FIFA
D&P
BDO
SPL
SFL
SFA
ASA
Lord Nimo

and more all say both legally and from a sporting perspective it is the same club.

The business entity has changed ...that is all...

Rangers had a wee spell as Wave tower
Celtic had a wee spell as Pacific shelf
Neither had any impact on the club

Joe B

The post that began:

Well, not exactly. What I'm trying to say is that no-one is right or wrong on this.

It's just a matter of perspective

That's probably the most sensible post I've seen on this issue.

Hmmm....I think I agreed that legally it might be the same, but like the Chinese MG.....it's a matter of perspective.
You can choose to believe it is an MG or not...in a spiritual sense.
Not offering a judgement though.