http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMKejnHCqTA

watching this now

i know man, tbh to me though, I did change my prediction after the 2nd round after realising what an overrated pile of trash scott is.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Just remember and record is only as good as the fighters on it, don't just by the numbers. And when unbeaten fighters step up to the next level, fighting someone that can big problems for their style, they can be found wanting.

Pavlik was a good fighter, Bhop dragged him up to light heavy though, gave him a schooling and then Pavlik developed a major drinking problem.

Great performance by Martinez.

Martinez is a don. Only Manny moves quicker than him. He's so slick and crafty.

good fight, martinez is too good. he would give floyd a very hard time at 154.

you gonna make that article about who you think would beat floyd at 140, 147 and 154 then?

I few years back, I said Pacquiao was the toughest fight for Floyd, and Martinez was the second, and Floyd would not fight either of them.

Floyd has proved me right so far.

Am I right in saying Sergio is vulnerable against big punching fighters who pressure him and close the ring down?

Margarito, KOed him

Hmm, are you saying GGG will KO him.

Maybe.

I think GGG is the kind of fighter who would cause Sergio big problems. Martinez gets hit a lot, that's a massive handicap against a puncher like GGG.

But he's got a good chin to be fair to him.

Recovers well, Pavlik was a huge puncher as well.

Check out the Pavlik vs Taylor, the first fight.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2Tf8nCQQxE

will do

if a referee says it's a slip but it's actually a knockdown, can the judges overturn that decision when they're scoring?

No

that's quite a stupid rule then...

so if the ref is retar.ded, the judges can't rectify his errors? how is that even remotely logical?

Ref makes the calls, judges have to listen.