or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 9 comments are related to an article called:

Southampton hindering bale deal?

Page 1 of 1

posted on 31/7/13

They traded it for Tommy Forecast

comment by adam85 (U9560)

posted on 31/7/13

As far I remember being reported, we had a agreed a flat £5m with a further £7m in add-ons, then a couple of years later Southampton were struggling so we paid part of the fee early and forego the rest so we ended paying £8m only.

Only what I read at the time (of the 2nd payment) so not sure of the validity.

posted on 31/7/13

Can't believe Fergie refused to pay a few extra millions to get Bale.

As great as Fergie was, his stubborness cost him a few world class players

posted on 31/7/13

Comment deleted by Article Creator

posted on 31/7/13

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by HRH (U15236)

posted on 31/7/13

It was 5m, rising to 10m if memory serves me right.

However they settled for about 8m in total and we did it early. I believe their 15% of any future transfer was taken out too at this point.

They are entitled to a 2/3m as they nurtured him I think

posted on 31/7/13

They had 25% sell on clause, missing out on huge money for a.couple of quid haha

comment by Chronic (U3423)

posted on 31/7/13

They were skint at the time which is why levy moved in with that extra cash. Smart by levy

posted on 1/8/13

Yeh that was a smart move by levy and Southampton are missing out however without that money they might have gone under.

Page 1 of 1

Sign in if you want to comment