I did see that, Agbonlahor was climbing all over him.
Not surprised commentators wouldn't mention that though.

I know it makes no difference now but it just bugs me

Don't suppose they mentioned Ba being pushed over in the penalty area on 48 minutes either!

It really doesn't matter, 3 points in the bag and we move on. You get some decisions and loose some, wasn't 100% blatant, JT was pushed so argument for and against, anywho! Grinded out the result were perhaps last year we may have drew

First thing I thought when I saw it on SSN this morning was it was a foul on Terry.

Jose's comments about Lambert made me chuckle. So glad he's back.

I disagree. As blatant pen as you will see all season. Pretty sure if someone touched my right shoulder, it wouldn't cause my left arm to shoot up in the air. Talk about clutching at straws!

Watch the Ba penalty incident on 48 mins. Even more nailed on !

He didn't just touch him, he pushed him down so even if it shouldn't of pushed his arms up it was still a foul on JT

Wouldn't expect a biased Villa fan to agree.

Definite foul on John Terry. Move on

When it's villa fans arguing with Chelsea, it's always going to be biased. The neutral press overage however suggests it was a blatant pen. Do the math.

Or maybe I make my own mind up based on what my own two eyes see? I don't need pundits or so-called "journalists" to form an opinion.

It was a foul. Quit crying and move on with your life.

Furthermore, your second penalty at the Emirates on Saturday wasn't a penalty. You win some, you lose some.

You saw it with your own two eyes through blue tinted spectacles. Those of a neutral stance or "so called" journalists (assume you mean all of them) have all said it was a penalty.

I'm not crying, I didn't start the thread, I just responded to the question. If you don't like the answer, don't ask the question.

Read my profile before assuming I'm a Chelsea fan. I'm not.

In this case I'm 100% neutral. Watch the highlights again. If you don't see Agbonlahor unfairly leaning on Terry as the ball comes into the area then I'm afraid it's you overcome by bias, not I

I've seen it and I've read countless reports from the press who all suggest it was a definite penalty (looks like they too are "overcome by bias" ), so I take theirs and my own views over yours Champers if that's ok?

You are free to take which ever opinion you wish my little Brummie giddy kipper, It's ancient history either way.

Off topic, it's been an encouraging start for you. Not much longer than 6 months ago that you were beaten over two legs by Bradford. Now you're winning convincingly at the Emirates and being marginally pipped at the Bridge. I like Lambert and hope you can continue this good form on a while longer

I have no idea what a giddy kipper is.

You win some, you lose some and you move on; strong ref on Saturday, weak one on Wednesday - c'est la vie.

My biggest regret is actually that Ivanovic will inevitably face a 3 game ban now that I understand the FA can use evidence even if a ref has 'seen' an incident. Gotta take him out my Dream Team

Yeah that was a red in my and probably anyone else's opinion. Not a lot different to what Steven Taylor did on Monday.

And in typically cruel fashion, he then nets the winner. Now THAT I do have sympathy towards Villa for

To be fair, that's exactly what Suarez did to them last season, so we just have to wait patiently for our karma now.

Had Ba been awarded a pen in the 48th minute it would never have happened and the whole debate would be academic!