the gas...and still by some distance...this is fabs year at barca......
Has to be Cesc for me, he can play deep and attacking. Can Ozil play deep?
Some Gooners are still sore over the way Cesc left. That's besides the point. Let's have a good natured discussion on here.
Slightly Fabregas for his vision. Very very difficult though.
"Has to be Cesc for me, he can play deep and attacking. Can Ozil play deep?
Versatility does not add to one quality. Very same argument Scousers use when they used to refer to Gerrard.
Just cause he played right back, they thought he was better than Cesc.
Give ozil a season with us and then make a decision
I think Fabregas is a better player but I don't think he's been a better player for Barca than Ozil was for Madrid.
Will be interesting to see how they perform for their sides from now on.
Castor
Ozil can get better. But we've already seen what he's capable.
It's not like he's some kid on the fringes of first team. He's an elite player.
Just cause he played right back, they thought he was better than Cesc.
fair enough
From what i've seen (Ozil at Madrid) and Fab at Arsenal & Barca its got to be Fabregas.
Fabregas is just as creative if not more, can dictate and control a match. Dont think ive seen Ozil do that. Fab can score goals too which Ozil isnt too good at.
Ozil may have more assists in the past 3 years but that probably due to the idiots at Barca playing cesc as a CF.
Also Both players are World Class but Fab slightly better.
There's a reason why I referred back to the Cesc at Arsenal.
Barca misused the c'rap out of him.
Love Cesc but Ozil is the assist king and is younger than Cesc
Both are world class. Both play slightly different roles. Fab is better.
I don't think versatility is something to be scoffed at, though.
Fabregas when played in numerous roles is still a quality player even if he's not at is best (when played as an attacking mid).
Ozil never impressed me that much when playing wide whereas Fabregas was more influential when playing out of position.
It's why it's hard comparing them for Barca and Madrid as Ozil would mainly play in his favoured role.
Fabregas is better but Ozil is probably the only player that comes close to him.
Next question.
Could they play in the same team along with Santi?
-----Flamini---Ramsey------
-Ozil------Cesc----Cazorla-
Would that work?
Fabregas offers more to the team than Ozil but as an attacking threat Ozil is better. But you guys sold Fabregas for under £25m and Ozil cost over £40m.
Next question.
Could they play in the same team along with Santi?
-----Flamini---Ramsey------
-Ozil------Cesc----Cazorla-
Would that work?
_________________
Phew....that is cracking. Think it could work.
But you guys sold Fabregas for under £25m and Ozil cost over £40m.
-----
Fab was sold for a total of £35 Million. It was only that low because Barca knew he was the only club he would join. If he was a normal mercenary he would easily fetch over 45Million.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Fabregas is a better passer and goal scorer so how is Ozil more of an attacking threat?
Dribbling is all he has on him.
If this question was asked 3 years ago when Cesc was an Arsenal player, everybody would say Ozil is better and call us 'diluded gooonies lolz'
Özil has the better set pieces as seen against Stoke. Better dribbler too.
Cesc though can do pretty much everything for a midfielder. None of them are tanks or anything but as an all round midfielder they're aren't many, if any better than Cesc bar Xavi I'd say.
Özil though is the only guy who can replace Cesc creativity.
If this question was asked 3 years ago when Cesc was an Arsenal player, everybody would say Ozil is better and call us 'diluded gooonies lolz'
=========================================
So true.
Sign in if you want to comment
Fabregas vs Ozil
Page 1 of 3
posted on 1/10/13
the gas...and still by some distance...this is fabs year at barca......
posted on 1/10/13
Has to be Cesc for me, he can play deep and attacking. Can Ozil play deep?
posted on 1/10/13
Some Gooners are still sore over the way Cesc left. That's besides the point. Let's have a good natured discussion on here.
posted on 1/10/13
Slightly Fabregas for his vision. Very very difficult though.
posted on 1/10/13
"Has to be Cesc for me, he can play deep and attacking. Can Ozil play deep?
Versatility does not add to one quality. Very same argument Scousers use when they used to refer to Gerrard.
Just cause he played right back, they thought he was better than Cesc.
posted on 1/10/13
Give ozil a season with us and then make a decision
posted on 1/10/13
I think Fabregas is a better player but I don't think he's been a better player for Barca than Ozil was for Madrid.
Will be interesting to see how they perform for their sides from now on.
posted on 1/10/13
Castor
Ozil can get better. But we've already seen what he's capable.
It's not like he's some kid on the fringes of first team. He's an elite player.
posted on 1/10/13
Just cause he played right back, they thought he was better than Cesc.
fair enough
posted on 1/10/13
From what i've seen (Ozil at Madrid) and Fab at Arsenal & Barca its got to be Fabregas.
Fabregas is just as creative if not more, can dictate and control a match. Dont think ive seen Ozil do that. Fab can score goals too which Ozil isnt too good at.
Ozil may have more assists in the past 3 years but that probably due to the idiots at Barca playing cesc as a CF.
posted on 1/10/13
Also Both players are World Class but Fab slightly better.
posted on 1/10/13
There's a reason why I referred back to the Cesc at Arsenal.
Barca misused the c'rap out of him.
posted on 1/10/13
Love Cesc but Ozil is the assist king and is younger than Cesc
posted on 1/10/13
Both are world class. Both play slightly different roles. Fab is better.
posted on 1/10/13
I don't think versatility is something to be scoffed at, though.
Fabregas when played in numerous roles is still a quality player even if he's not at is best (when played as an attacking mid).
Ozil never impressed me that much when playing wide whereas Fabregas was more influential when playing out of position.
It's why it's hard comparing them for Barca and Madrid as Ozil would mainly play in his favoured role.
posted on 1/10/13
Fabregas is better but Ozil is probably the only player that comes close to him.
posted on 1/10/13
Next question.
Could they play in the same team along with Santi?
-----Flamini---Ramsey------
-Ozil------Cesc----Cazorla-
Would that work?
posted on 1/10/13
Fabregas offers more to the team than Ozil but as an attacking threat Ozil is better. But you guys sold Fabregas for under £25m and Ozil cost over £40m.
posted on 1/10/13
Next question.
Could they play in the same team along with Santi?
-----Flamini---Ramsey------
-Ozil------Cesc----Cazorla-
Would that work?
_________________
Phew....that is cracking. Think it could work.
posted on 1/10/13
But you guys sold Fabregas for under £25m and Ozil cost over £40m.
-----
Fab was sold for a total of £35 Million. It was only that low because Barca knew he was the only club he would join. If he was a normal mercenary he would easily fetch over 45Million.
posted on 1/10/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 1/10/13
Fabregas is a better passer and goal scorer so how is Ozil more of an attacking threat?
Dribbling is all he has on him.
posted on 1/10/13
If this question was asked 3 years ago when Cesc was an Arsenal player, everybody would say Ozil is better and call us 'diluded gooonies lolz'
posted on 1/10/13
Özil has the better set pieces as seen against Stoke. Better dribbler too.
Cesc though can do pretty much everything for a midfielder. None of them are tanks or anything but as an all round midfielder they're aren't many, if any better than Cesc bar Xavi I'd say.
Özil though is the only guy who can replace Cesc creativity.
posted on 1/10/13
If this question was asked 3 years ago when Cesc was an Arsenal player, everybody would say Ozil is better and call us 'diluded gooonies lolz'
=========================================
So true.
Page 1 of 3