Gonna say Robert Pires.
I'm on a real Pires kick at the moment.
Yeah, Bobby P.
What a great player he was.
Bergkamp. Him, Cazorla and Ozil together
Bergkamp would be pointless without players who make the runs Freddie, Thierry and Bobby used to.
at the moment we are more in need of a player like Henry, so it would have to be him.
If you asked the question 2 months ago, the DB10 would have been my choice. But now we have Özil
Of the back five, I think only Lehmann would make our current starting XI.
Possibly Campbell, but it would depend on how well he worked with Mertesacker.
Bergkamp is never pointless what ever the scenario
Really looking forward to reading Stillness and Speed
Any answer other than Henry is simply wrong. Very wrong.
comment by Sheriff John Brown - bring back David Dein (U7482)
posted 17 seconds ago
Any answer other than Henry is simply wrong. Very wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Apart from Pires that is.
Bergkamp > Pires > Reyes > Henry
Bergkamp > Henry
========
The question is not who was the best player in the invincibles but who would be best for the current team.
comment by Sïr Dïgbÿ (U6039)
posted 29 seconds ago
Lauren
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We have Flamini. A more docile amid technical player. But still one hell of mother feckR
The question is not who was the best player in the invincibles but who would be best for the current team.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly, D'J.
So we're all agreed on Pires then, yeah?
Why compare a RB and a CM, IAWT?
comment by Lexington eins zwei fünf Punkt zwei (U8879)
posted 30 seconds ago
Bergkamp > Pires > Reyes > Henry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Has someone hacked lex account?
and I replied with Bergkamp....
Loved Lauren.
What a dude
Szczesny
Lauren Campbell Koscielny Gibbs
Vieira Ramsey
Ozil Bergkamp Pires
Henry
and I replied with Bergkamp....
==========
You would have Ozil, Cazorla and Bergkamp creating and no-one to take advantage. Would be absolutely pointless.
comment by (U1137)D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 0 seconds ago
Why compare a RB and a CM, IAWT?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I just assumed he didn't mentioned Lauren for his technical abilities but more for his fighting spirit.
If it was indeed for his abilities, I personally think Sagna is a better player.
Sign in if you want to comment
INVINCIBLES
Page 1 of 3
posted on 4/10/13
Edu
posted on 4/10/13
Gonna say Robert Pires.
I'm on a real Pires kick at the moment.
Yeah, Bobby P.
What a great player he was.
posted on 4/10/13
Bergkamp. Him, Cazorla and Ozil together
posted on 4/10/13
Bergkamp would be pointless without players who make the runs Freddie, Thierry and Bobby used to.
posted on 4/10/13
Henry
posted on 4/10/13
at the moment we are more in need of a player like Henry, so it would have to be him.
If you asked the question 2 months ago, the DB10 would have been my choice. But now we have Özil
posted on 4/10/13
Of the back five, I think only Lehmann would make our current starting XI.
Possibly Campbell, but it would depend on how well he worked with Mertesacker.
posted on 4/10/13
Bergkamp is never pointless what ever the scenario
posted on 4/10/13
Really looking forward to reading Stillness and Speed
posted on 4/10/13
Vieira
posted on 4/10/13
Any answer other than Henry is simply wrong. Very wrong.
posted on 4/10/13
Lauren
posted on 4/10/13
comment by Sheriff John Brown - bring back David Dein (U7482)
posted 17 seconds ago
Any answer other than Henry is simply wrong. Very wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Apart from Pires that is.
posted on 4/10/13
Bergkamp > Henry
posted on 4/10/13
Bergkamp > Pires > Reyes > Henry
posted on 4/10/13
Bergkamp > Henry
========
The question is not who was the best player in the invincibles but who would be best for the current team.
posted on 4/10/13
comment by Sïr Dïgbÿ (U6039)
posted 29 seconds ago
Lauren
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We have Flamini. A more docile amid technical player. But still one hell of mother feckR
posted on 4/10/13
The question is not who was the best player in the invincibles but who would be best for the current team.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly, D'J.
So we're all agreed on Pires then, yeah?
posted on 4/10/13
Why compare a RB and a CM, IAWT?
posted on 4/10/13
comment by Lexington eins zwei fünf Punkt zwei (U8879)
posted 30 seconds ago
Bergkamp > Pires > Reyes > Henry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Has someone hacked lex account?
posted on 4/10/13
and I replied with Bergkamp....
posted on 4/10/13
Loved Lauren.
What a dude
posted on 4/10/13
Szczesny
Lauren Campbell Koscielny Gibbs
Vieira Ramsey
Ozil Bergkamp Pires
Henry
posted on 4/10/13
and I replied with Bergkamp....
==========
You would have Ozil, Cazorla and Bergkamp creating and no-one to take advantage. Would be absolutely pointless.
posted on 4/10/13
comment by (U1137)D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 0 seconds ago
Why compare a RB and a CM, IAWT?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I just assumed he didn't mentioned Lauren for his technical abilities but more for his fighting spirit.
If it was indeed for his abilities, I personally think Sagna is a better player.
Page 1 of 3