I'd be happy to take him on loan only if we were to spend money on a quality striker to partner Jelavic and get Naisy back on the wing.

were willing to spend around 3m on this guy we could use that money to bring in a quality striker

=======

or pay the tax bill?

I dont think you'd get him back

If liverpool / Kenny D arent getting anything from it in return, I THINK... they would look to loan him to a better team. Mid - low prem playing against quality opposition or Championship team

Why should we take the little fvd on loan. He left us, thought he was bigger than the club. Chased the bright lights of Liverpool and it's all gone tiiits up for him. He was warned at the time not to go for his development and he choose to ignore it.

Now he wants back?! So we take him back and Liverpool who stole him from us gets him to have game time? Fluck right off.

If they want to sell him for half the price they paid, fair enough. Otherwise he can stay in the bed he made.

We will still get Cuellar in, that will happen before the window closes.

Why put Naismith on the wing when he is brilliant at sitting just behind the foward/s

If we get cuellar in then I'll be happy with that at CH.

2 from Cuellar, Goian and Bartley with Weir emergency back up.

No thanks. Let him "learn his trade" at anfield. I'd rather give Perry a bit of first team exposure.

Why not punt Jelavic , pay the tax man and with the million or so left your lot could buy a cut price Beattie.

I dont want him back. And dont forget part of his transfer deal included payments to be made to Rangers when he has played a certain amount of games for Liverpool. If he goes on loan that means these payments will be delayed.

Desperation for a couple of £