Comment deleted by Site Moderator
why was townsend so good for england.. but is utter shiiit for us atm
Lamela no where near ready ffs
WHY THE FACK IS ERIKSEN AND LAMELA ON THE BENCH.
=====================
are.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by ®åρtor (U1071)
posted 18 seconds ago
I am asking the same question 4th.
Siggs is a good player, but shouldnt be starting.
---
eh? siggs is probably our main goal threat. not only should he definately be starting, but he should be one of the first 3 or 4 names on the sheet atm
Wouldn't mind seeing Lennon coming on on the left, to give us more pace and width.
Chronic
Lamela has shown anything yet
Doovde how can a 30m player not be ready
Not the first time it's happened, and definitely won't be the last.
Have you actually watched Lamela play this season. Just because he had a large price tag, doesn't mean he's a nailed on start.
I wonder what DVD they showed Soldado prior to his signing. I imagine watching Lennon and Bale racing down the wings crossing and Modric and VDV threading balls through. Rather than watching his central defenders pass to each other.
sloppy again at the back....
Not much in this game so far.
comment by 4th - Owner of 250k comment on Good News (U9213)
posted 7 seconds ago
Doovde how can a 30m player not be ready. Absolute bollix mate.
Siggy is awful on the left bar the odd goal. Everything we do goes down the right. So predictable and easy to defend against
---
what on earth are you talking about.
what has the price tag of lamela got to do with anything?
bale was 86 mill but is he the best player in the world? no...
just because lamela cost 30 mill why does that mean that he is automatically our best player?
as for your opinion on siggy.. i can only assume that you dont have a clue what you are on about
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Lamela hasn't had much of a chance though
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
He's played enough to show he's not better than the players starting
Chronic
This 4th bloke is a bit of a plank.
He cost 30m. Thus he MUST start
We still look hungover nfrom the spanners game, we seem to afraid to attack at pace
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Sign in if you want to comment
FT:Aston Villa 0 V 2 TOTTENHAM match thread
Page 13 of 33
14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18
posted on 20/10/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 20/10/13
why was townsend so good for england.. but is utter shiiit for us atm
posted on 20/10/13
Lamela no where near ready ffs
posted on 20/10/13
WHY THE FACK IS ERIKSEN AND LAMELA ON THE BENCH.
=====================
are.
posted on 20/10/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 20/10/13
Free-kick
posted on 20/10/13
comment by ®åρtor (U1071)
posted 18 seconds ago
I am asking the same question 4th.
Siggs is a good player, but shouldnt be starting.
---
eh? siggs is probably our main goal threat. not only should he definately be starting, but he should be one of the first 3 or 4 names on the sheet atm
posted on 20/10/13
Wouldn't mind seeing Lennon coming on on the left, to give us more pace and width.
posted on 20/10/13
close, good delivery
posted on 20/10/13
Chronic
Lamela has shown anything yet
posted on 20/10/13
Doovde how can a 30m player not be ready
Not the first time it's happened, and definitely won't be the last.
Have you actually watched Lamela play this season. Just because he had a large price tag, doesn't mean he's a nailed on start.
posted on 20/10/13
I wonder what DVD they showed Soldado prior to his signing. I imagine watching Lennon and Bale racing down the wings crossing and Modric and VDV threading balls through. Rather than watching his central defenders pass to each other.
posted on 20/10/13
sloppy again at the back....
posted on 20/10/13
Not much in this game so far.
posted on 20/10/13
comment by 4th - Owner of 250k comment on Good News (U9213)
posted 7 seconds ago
Doovde how can a 30m player not be ready. Absolute bollix mate.
Siggy is awful on the left bar the odd goal. Everything we do goes down the right. So predictable and easy to defend against
---
what on earth are you talking about.
what has the price tag of lamela got to do with anything?
bale was 86 mill but is he the best player in the world? no...
just because lamela cost 30 mill why does that mean that he is automatically our best player?
as for your opinion on siggy.. i can only assume that you dont have a clue what you are on about
posted on 20/10/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 20/10/13
Lamela hasn't had much of a chance though
posted on 20/10/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 20/10/13
He's played enough to show he's not better than the players starting
posted on 20/10/13
Chronic
This 4th bloke is a bit of a plank.
He cost 30m. Thus he MUST start
posted on 20/10/13
We still look hungover nfrom the spanners game, we seem to afraid to attack at pace
posted on 20/10/13
daswonbauer
posted on 20/10/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 20/10/13
Jesus...
posted on 20/10/13
Get Lennon on.
Page 13 of 33
14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18