or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 8 comments are related to an article called:

thats why we need Walcott

Page 1 of 1

posted on 22/10/13

There are still muppets on the board who think he doesn't get into our team

posted on 22/10/13

I agree. Walcott would have given us a whole new outlet . Ozil and cazorla could have threaded balls through to him to run on to.

posted on 22/10/13

Its just mainly that tool Garwood that can't seem to see his threat.

posted on 22/10/13

It's more than just garwood

comment by Herbie (U7136)

posted on 22/10/13

Agreed. The only player with genuine pace and thrust and the threat required to limit the opponents chances of squeezing play and defending high. Opens up the field immeasurably having he as an outlet.

Without him, against sides as good as Dortmund, we find it really difficult creating clear chances. Don't think we deserved to lose today, but how many saves did we force a pretty dodgy keeper into today? A game that was at home? Even the goal came from a Dortmund error of judgement. Tells its own story.

We'll be a lot more varied and threatening when Walcott returns.

posted on 22/10/13

Walcott will hopefully be back for return leg, we need to accept the German teams are technically above English teams even Arsenal, Klopp must replace Wenger in future, he is what we need moving forward.

posted on 22/10/13

Don't think they are technically better they pressed a lot more which is why you could see that they sat deeper in the second half cos they were tired. Reus was pretty ordinary so was Lewandowski until he scored but he shouldn't of been on the pitch by then.

posted on 22/10/13

Walcott or the OX would have been a good option, but the real miss was Flamini.

Page 1 of 1

Sign in if you want to comment