comment by Fourzah (U22366)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by LAMCAM♠♣️ (U18537)
posted 7 seconds ago
Eagle Eye or whatever it's called needs to be redesigned. May be it doesn't sense it when it's in that corner and/or keeper holding it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eagle Eye?
Bat Eye
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Japs eye
comment by Mike (U1170)
posted less than a minute ago
Hawkeye needs a drive to Barnard Castle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by *(K̇ash) I'm the Mané - 6 Times B... (U1108)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Mike (U1170)
posted less than a minute ago
Hawkeye needs a drive to Barnard Castle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not sure if someone has said this already but surely the ref tests his tech before the match?
Villa to win with a hawkeye awarded goal?
Should have been a goal. White lines matter.
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 31 seconds ago
comment by Jay. (U16498)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted less than a minute ago
He’s got it against the post the whole time hasn’t he?
That would explain the tech not working properly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe it's reading the fact that it's touching the post as that must mean it can't have crossed the line? Coz no one ever thought that it could touch the post from behind.
But it's so far over... even if GLT missed it, VAR should be seeing that surely
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If it's touching the post it's not over the line surely as the whole ball has to be over and the post is the width of the line.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ball was behind the post.
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 31 seconds ago
comment by Jay. (U16498)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted less than a minute ago
He’s got it against the post the whole time hasn’t he?
That would explain the tech not working properly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe it's reading the fact that it's touching the post as that must mean it can't have crossed the line? Coz no one ever thought that it could touch the post from behind.
But it's so far over... even if GLT missed it, VAR should be seeing that surely
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If it's touching the post it's not over the line surely as the whole ball has to be over and the post is the width of the line.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ball was behind the post.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know.
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 2 minutes ago
He’s got it against the post the whole time hasn’t he?
That would explain the tech not working properly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope. At one point it was off the post and behind the line.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah I’ve seen the other angle now
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Jay. (U16498)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted less than a minute ago
He’s got it against the post the whole time hasn’t he?
That would explain the tech not working properly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe it's reading the fact that it's touching the post as that must mean it can't have crossed the line? Coz no one ever thought that it could touch the post from behind.
But it's so far over... even if GLT missed it, VAR should be seeing that surely
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If it's touching the post it's not over the line surely as the whole ball has to be over and the post is the width of the line.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If it's touching the back of the post it must have crossed the line. In order for the ball not to have crossed the line, the ball would have to be phased in to the post!
Not really relevant anyway as it's miles over
Surely with all the other COVID related changes to the league, they can award a goal at HT if the tech now says it was a clear goal.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Can't blame the ref to be fair
Came up goal on his watch at half time???
We need the overhead view, they always do that. The VR thing.
Im sick of VAR already. Nothing changes
comment by Jay. (U16498)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Jay. (U16498)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted less than a minute ago
He’s got it against the post the whole time hasn’t he?
That would explain the tech not working properly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe it's reading the fact that it's touching the post as that must mean it can't have crossed the line? Coz no one ever thought that it could touch the post from behind.
But it's so far over... even if GLT missed it, VAR should be seeing that surely
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If it's touching the post it's not over the line surely as the whole ball has to be over and the post is the width of the line.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If it's touching the back of the post it must have crossed the line. In order for the ball not to have crossed the line, the ball would have to be phased in to the post!
Not really relevant anyway as it's miles over
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It wouldn't. It can touch the post the whole way around it.
Sounds like it wasn’t turned on lol
All this technology and they still can’t get it right!
It was behind the post but was it behind the bar? That's what the mainstream media are not showing us
Clusterfacktardery in fact
.
Page 27777 of 40304
27778 | 27779 | 27780 | 27781 | 27782
posted on 17/6/20
comment by Fourzah (U22366)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by LAMCAM♠♣️ (U18537)
posted 7 seconds ago
Eagle Eye or whatever it's called needs to be redesigned. May be it doesn't sense it when it's in that corner and/or keeper holding it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eagle Eye?
Bat Eye
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Japs eye
posted on 17/6/20
comment by Mike (U1170)
posted less than a minute ago
Hawkeye needs a drive to Barnard Castle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 17/6/20
comment by *(K̇ash) I'm the Mané - 6 Times B... (U1108)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Mike (U1170)
posted less than a minute ago
Hawkeye needs a drive to Barnard Castle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 17/6/20
System now working lol
posted on 17/6/20
Not sure if someone has said this already but surely the ref tests his tech before the match?
posted on 17/6/20
Villa to win with a hawkeye awarded goal?
posted on 17/6/20
Should have been a goal. White lines matter.
posted on 17/6/20
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 31 seconds ago
comment by Jay. (U16498)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted less than a minute ago
He’s got it against the post the whole time hasn’t he?
That would explain the tech not working properly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe it's reading the fact that it's touching the post as that must mean it can't have crossed the line? Coz no one ever thought that it could touch the post from behind.
But it's so far over... even if GLT missed it, VAR should be seeing that surely
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If it's touching the post it's not over the line surely as the whole ball has to be over and the post is the width of the line.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ball was behind the post.
posted on 17/6/20
Forgot to turn it on ffs
posted on 17/6/20
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 31 seconds ago
comment by Jay. (U16498)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted less than a minute ago
He’s got it against the post the whole time hasn’t he?
That would explain the tech not working properly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe it's reading the fact that it's touching the post as that must mean it can't have crossed the line? Coz no one ever thought that it could touch the post from behind.
But it's so far over... even if GLT missed it, VAR should be seeing that surely
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If it's touching the post it's not over the line surely as the whole ball has to be over and the post is the width of the line.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ball was behind the post.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know.
posted on 17/6/20
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 2 minutes ago
He’s got it against the post the whole time hasn’t he?
That would explain the tech not working properly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope. At one point it was off the post and behind the line.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah I’ve seen the other angle now
posted on 17/6/20
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Jay. (U16498)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted less than a minute ago
He’s got it against the post the whole time hasn’t he?
That would explain the tech not working properly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe it's reading the fact that it's touching the post as that must mean it can't have crossed the line? Coz no one ever thought that it could touch the post from behind.
But it's so far over... even if GLT missed it, VAR should be seeing that surely
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If it's touching the post it's not over the line surely as the whole ball has to be over and the post is the width of the line.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If it's touching the back of the post it must have crossed the line. In order for the ball not to have crossed the line, the ball would have to be phased in to the post!
Not really relevant anyway as it's miles over
posted on 17/6/20
Surely with all the other COVID related changes to the league, they can award a goal at HT if the tech now says it was a clear goal.
posted on 17/6/20
That is facktardery
posted on 17/6/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 17/6/20
Can't blame the ref to be fair
posted on 17/6/20
Came up goal on his watch at half time???
posted on 17/6/20
We need the overhead view, they always do that. The VR thing.
posted on 17/6/20
Im sick of VAR already. Nothing changes
posted on 17/6/20
Seats going mental
posted on 17/6/20
comment by Jay. (U16498)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Jay. (U16498)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted less than a minute ago
He’s got it against the post the whole time hasn’t he?
That would explain the tech not working properly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe it's reading the fact that it's touching the post as that must mean it can't have crossed the line? Coz no one ever thought that it could touch the post from behind.
But it's so far over... even if GLT missed it, VAR should be seeing that surely
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If it's touching the post it's not over the line surely as the whole ball has to be over and the post is the width of the line.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If it's touching the back of the post it must have crossed the line. In order for the ball not to have crossed the line, the ball would have to be phased in to the post!
Not really relevant anyway as it's miles over
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It wouldn't. It can touch the post the whole way around it.
posted on 17/6/20
Sounds like it wasn’t turned on lol
posted on 17/6/20
All this technology and they still can’t get it right!
posted on 17/6/20
It was behind the post but was it behind the bar? That's what the mainstream media are not showing us
posted on 17/6/20
Clusterfacktardery in fact
Page 27777 of 40304
27778 | 27779 | 27780 | 27781 | 27782