comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 27 seconds ago
Yes, that one was. But not a red. Oscar had his shot, so no goalscoring opportunity denied.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Bu..bu..bu..but the point is that the foul caused his goal-scoring opportunity to be affected. If he had taken a touch and not tried to chip the goalie, it would have been a red. I don't see how it would have been different.

I don't really see the point in carrying on this discussion, you are too stubborn to see sense.

comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 27 seconds ago
Yes, that one was. But not a red. Oscar had his shot, so no goalscoring opportunity denied.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Bu..bu..bu..but the point is that the foul caused his goal-scoring opportunity to be affected. If he had taken a touch and not tried to chip the goalie, it would have been a red. I don't see how it would have been different.

I don't really see the point in carrying on this discussion, you are too stubborn to see sense.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He took the shot before the foul. The keeper would still have been there, he wouldn't have suddenly disappeared. The foul did not affect the shot.

comment by BellissimoZola (U16190)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Sideshow (U11809)
posted 2 minutes ago
lol Gunther Cahill's handball wasn't a red
--------------------------------------------
and the pen would've been harsh
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only if you are a Spurs fan

How can the foul affect the shot if the foul was after the shot?

Your shot is often altered in the presence of an approaching body.

Absolute right DJ Tell them

Anyway I think it is more of due to the fact that it was a reckless challenge than a clear goal-scoring opportunity.

comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted less than a minute ago
Your shot is often altered in the presence of an approaching body.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But an approaching body is not a foul. Ospina would have been close even if he didn't foul Oscar, and the lob was the likely shot in that situation.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted less than a minute ago
Anyway I think it is more ofdue to the fact that it was a reckless challenge than a clear goal-scoring opportunity.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Start sending off players for headed challenges when they don't get the ball but headbutt the opponent?

concussion for oscar.

comment by Mr Chelsea ✪ (U3579)
posted less than a minute ago
concussion for oscar.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not suprised

score ?

0-0

0-0

It will be that score at the final whistle as well

http://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/309271

But an approaching body is not a foul. Ospina would have been close even if he didn't foul Oscar, and the lob was the likely shot in that situation.
________________

I know, but you asked how it affected the situation. Had Ospina been in control and not fouled Oscar then his clear goal-scoring opportunity wouldn't have been altered.


Start sending off players for headed challenges when they don't get the ball but headbutt the opponent?
______

That is WUM level comparison. A jump to get the ball is hugely different to someone running at full pelt and colliding into someone else, similar to something you see in the 6Nations.

Anyway, it is clear that neither of us are going to agree with each other here DJ.

Fabregas

What did 4za say?

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Lol kos saved Ospina from carrying the ball over the line in his hands

Petr Cheque book will be our back up keeper next season.

236000