Makes me sick when your thugs hack our players down every time they approach the box without punishment but then I don't go making articles bitching on your board because our players didn't equaliser sooner with the amount of chances they were bottling towards the end
It's not on your board you pillock.
Cheats.
Your right player waits for the smallest amount of contact and down they go.its become part of the game and the players don't get fined of punished in any way.
Ivanovic was fouled in the build up to your 2nd goal.
What comes around, goes around
Cheats.
At least Josès record is safe
Were you this upset when you robbed 3 points at Swansea last season?
Well we lost at Swansea last year, so probably not
Would you have been upset if you held on and won courtesy of fouling Ivanovic?
1. There was no foul on Ivanovic
2. There is a moral difference between 'missing a foul' and pure 'cheating for a foul' - morals. I have them
Fine at home still doesn't change the fact you "cheated"
The records safe pal. Don't stress yourself.
Morals
comment by i.am.JH (U18654)
posted 3 minutes ago
1. There was no foul on Ivanovic
2. There is a moral difference between 'missing a foul' and pure 'cheating for a foul' - morals. I have them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Yes there was
2. Either way the goal should not have stood, should have ended 1-1, karma bit you in the arris
No surprises Ramires took an early fall it just saved your thug players from doing it for him like they had been doing all game
The records safe boys. Let it go. Enjoy your J2o's.
Morals
There's no morals in hypocrisy
All is fair in underdogs getting every bit of help possible to win a match
http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11698/8359185/
Stab in the dark here, but i guess you weren't preaching the high horse last boxing day
Where's the foul in that incident. The striker doesn't even back into him.
If deflecting away from your own insecurities makes you feel better then go for it....
Morals
I'm preaching. There is a difference between fouls being missed and players blatantly conning refs into giving fouls.
Morals
Im guessing West Brom have never done that in the history of football?
I'm sure they have. But you would never catch me justifying it.
Like I say....morals
Morals in a football game for god sake
Comment deleted by Article Creator
You support Chelsea. I expect no less pal.
Enjoy your night. Your record is safe and all is well. Me and my morals will move on!
José Mourinho said it was 'a clear penalty' and we all know from when Chelsea spoke to Ashley Cole behind Arsenal's backs that The Special One speaks the undiluted truth. Cough.
Sign in if you want to comment
The art of Diving
Page 1 of 3
posted on 9/11/13
Makes me sick when your thugs hack our players down every time they approach the box without punishment but then I don't go making articles bitching on your board because our players didn't equaliser sooner with the amount of chances they were bottling towards the end
posted on 9/11/13
It's not on your board you pillock.
Cheats.
posted on 9/11/13
Your right player waits for the smallest amount of contact and down they go.its become part of the game and the players don't get fined of punished in any way.
posted on 9/11/13
Ivanovic was fouled in the build up to your 2nd goal.
What comes around, goes around
posted on 9/11/13
Cheats.
At least Josès record is safe
posted on 9/11/13
Were you this upset when you robbed 3 points at Swansea last season?
posted on 9/11/13
Well we lost at Swansea last year, so probably not
posted on 9/11/13
Would you have been upset if you held on and won courtesy of fouling Ivanovic?
posted on 9/11/13
1. There was no foul on Ivanovic
2. There is a moral difference between 'missing a foul' and pure 'cheating for a foul' - morals. I have them
posted on 9/11/13
Fine at home still doesn't change the fact you "cheated"
posted on 9/11/13
The records safe pal. Don't stress yourself.
Morals
posted on 9/11/13
comment by i.am.JH (U18654)
posted 3 minutes ago
1. There was no foul on Ivanovic
2. There is a moral difference between 'missing a foul' and pure 'cheating for a foul' - morals. I have them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Yes there was
2. Either way the goal should not have stood, should have ended 1-1, karma bit you in the arris
posted on 9/11/13
No surprises Ramires took an early fall it just saved your thug players from doing it for him like they had been doing all game
posted on 9/11/13
The records safe boys. Let it go. Enjoy your J2o's.
Morals
posted on 9/11/13
There's no morals in hypocrisy
posted on 9/11/13
All is fair in underdogs getting every bit of help possible to win a match
posted on 9/11/13
http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11698/8359185/
Stab in the dark here, but i guess you weren't preaching the high horse last boxing day
posted on 9/11/13
Where's the foul in that incident. The striker doesn't even back into him.
If deflecting away from your own insecurities makes you feel better then go for it....
Morals
posted on 9/11/13
I'm preaching. There is a difference between fouls being missed and players blatantly conning refs into giving fouls.
Morals
posted on 9/11/13
Im guessing West Brom have never done that in the history of football?
posted on 9/11/13
I'm sure they have. But you would never catch me justifying it.
Like I say....morals
posted on 9/11/13
Morals in a football game for god sake
posted on 9/11/13
Comment deleted by Article Creator
posted on 9/11/13
You support Chelsea. I expect no less pal.
Enjoy your night. Your record is safe and all is well. Me and my morals will move on!
posted on 9/11/13
José Mourinho said it was 'a clear penalty' and we all know from when Chelsea spoke to Ashley Cole behind Arsenal's backs that The Special One speaks the undiluted truth. Cough.
Page 1 of 3