And who is going to judge whether it was a dive or not, our friends at the FA?

Also why only for penalties? Surely a dive/simulation/conning the ref is the same everywhere on the pitch.

We had a cat once. It died

Needs to be done... Might eventually happen but will take a long time.

It's common sense really

Because Spurs wouldnt be able to fulfill fixtures

So would Bale have.

Also why only for penalties? Surely a dive/simulation/conning the ref is the same everywhere on the pitch.
___

Yes of course. A dive for a penalty, is exactly the same as a dive on the half-way line

I think you are terrified of what would happen to Suarez tbh.

Oh, get a brain too

D'Jeezus worried about the implications for hard man cocaine Jack

You talking about other's needing to get a brain after your comments on the other thread. Oh the irony of it all.

I said Liverpool are flat track bullies.

Lots of Liverpool fans would say the same.

You are still crying about it. So what?

Yes we are complete flat track bullies. Better to be flat track bullies than lose 3-0 to the mighty West Ham who play with no recognised striker

Poor wum you are looking through your articles. Try harder chum

You are clearly obsessed

Great article!

But then look at Rugby Union, 'There is often a television match official (TMO; popularly called the "video referee", to assist with certain decisions, linked up to the referee by radio.' If football was like this, then teams wouldn't get robbed, but then that takes away the drama of the game. It's all entertainment, the referees are always making bad decisions about diving, hand balls, fouls etc

It's seems I winked you...

If players didnt dive, or go down easy, and get soft penalties, Soldado would have to be put out of his misery by lethal injection, as he would have no real reason to exist otherwise.
Nobody wants that, surely ?
Long live the soft penalty.