Szczesny - 4

Sagna - 2
Koscielny - 5
Vermaelen - 5
Gibbs - 5

Flamini - 3
Ramsey - 2
Arteta - 2

Santi - 3
Giroud - 0
Özil - 3

Subs

Wilshere - 0
Bendtner - 0
Gnabry - 4

That is a bit generous for Bendtner. I'd give him a -1.

Sanga 8 .

What did Woj do wrong?

bendtner 1???

this aint come dine with me

Bendtner was hardly to blame (although the final cross from Sagna should have bene buried). But he is so pointless it defies belief.

Sagna was decent though Rev. Why the low rating for him?

"Sagna - 2"

You're an idiot

Sagna was the source of our best chances, therefore our best player, solid throughout.

Szczesny 6

Sagna 7
Koscielny 6
Vermaelen 6
Gibbs 5

Flamini 5
Ramsey 5
Arteta 6
Ozil 5
Cazorla 5

Giroud 5

The game was a 5 from our team, tbh.

Penguin...no rating for our Danish superstar?

Solid 5 Penguin

Wat is the Bendtner situation regarding to reports of the comments he made? If he did then I think he doesnt deserve a place in the bench at all

Surely Akpom should be getting in the team?

Wow we had probably one of our top 3 toughest fixtures of the season and lost(think we should have had a point to be honest). And almost every team around us promptly lost/ drew their game. Really lucky for us

comment by (U13853)
posted 1 minute ago
Wat is the Bendtner situation regarding to reports of the comments he made? If he did then I think he doesnt deserve a place in the bench at all
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He did say it apparently. He is on the bench out of necessity unfortunately. Akpom deserves a go I guess, but Wenger must consider him to not be ready yet

Bet Akpom would have got the goal at the end, I mean all Bendtner had to do was move forward a couple of feet ffs.

Yeah dog, that was just ridiculous!

sagna had 2 good crosses. 15 shít ones. a billion misplaced passes. 67 dribbles into opposition players. 82 failed tackles. but the 2 good crosses mean he was our best player. logic.

why is everyone having a go at bendtner for that but not giroud who did exactly the same 5 minutes prior.

comment by Reverend Oxlade-Chamberlain - https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BUHA5PKCEAERHij.png:large (U5023)
posted 34 seconds ago
sagna had 2 good crosses. 15 shít ones. a billion misplaced passes. 67 dribbles into opposition players. 82 failed tackles. but the 2 good crosses mean he was our best player. logic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Well that's not true is it?

Agree with all except Wilshere - 6

Rev has the most biased ratings ever. He never liked Sagna so will stick to hating him even if he played like he did today, which probably was one of his best attacking games for ages.

How can you give Giroud 4 and Ozil 5? Surely the other way around. Ozil wasted everything that came to him today. He should have been subbed.

its stretching the truth. but it is true.

What a shiiiit rating is this