comment by Kung Fu Cantona (U18082)
posted 1 minute ago
For a buildiong that size, yes you would.
Especially for a controlled explosion.
I wonder why none of the witnesses claimed to hear a bloody loud set of bangs that go with explosives being let off?
Silent explosion possibly?
-----------------------
They did actually.
just do a quick search on youtube.
Fireman heard explosives going off and so did the janitor who was all over the media swearing blind he heard explosives going off.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So 2, people, out of the hundreds/thousands?
-----------------------
wow
Do you really think I only listed 2 because there were only 2 or do you think I just gave you 2 because it would make no sense listing every single person who heard explosives going off?
Use your brain.
hairspray!!
is your mrs 75 admin
comment by Jay - Joint Ballon d'Ork winner 2013. (U16498) posted 9 minutes ago
Those types of buildings are never empty though - although I guess you could fix the employment of security guards to get your own men in position. Someone would likely have noticed, and it would have taken a while to set up
===
That would make a great plot for a film....
As I came up with the idea Brad Pitt will play me and Ed Norton can play you
The lazy comments from some people on here shows why governments can get away with so much.
The funny thing is whether or not 9/11 was a conspiracy, the events that followed should be as clear as day for anyone on here just how corrupt the US and UK governments have been in their foreign policies.
Half a million plus people were killed in Iraq as a result of the lies our goverments told us and certain people and companies became very rich off of that.
So by all means, use the lazy 'tin foil hat' brush off but i'd rather wear a tin foil hat than stick my head in the ground and pretend nothing shady goes on.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Dunc the d'Ork - Proud co winner of the Ballon d'Ork 2013. (U11713)
posted 7 seconds ago
hairspray!!
is your mrs 75 admin
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm sure she has hairspray, I was using that as an example.
KFC
Do you think there is a possibility that the US flew those planes inro their own buildings?
Admin is correct, again - lots of innocuous things cause explosions. Even in an office, there are many, many things that can go boom.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Macca
please dont call him KFC, it doesnt sound right
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Jay - Joint Ballon d'Ork winner 2013. (U16498) posted 9 minutes ago
Those types of buildings are never empty though - although I guess you could fix the employment of security guards to get your own men in position. Someone would likely have noticed, and it would have taken a while to set up
===
That would make a great plot for a film....
As I came up with the idea Brad Pitt will play me and Ed Norton can play you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It sounds a bit like the plot to Ocean's 11 & 13
comment by Jay - Joint Ballon d'Ork winner 2013. (U16498)
posted 31 seconds ago
Admin is correct, again - lots of innocuous things cause explosions. Even in an office, there are many, many things that can go boom.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've got an air duster for my keyboard that could do some damage. I also use it for taking dents out cars.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Say you were an agency planning it. You would be able to, years in advance, get the plans of the building, the construction materials and associated properties of the materials, and then run 1000s of simulations identifying inherent weaknesses in the structure and architecture.
..................
Come up with a ball park figure of how many, and who, would have to be 'in the know', to be able to pull this off.
Was any of these conspiracies uncovered by recent whistle blowing, out of interest?
Did Bradley Manning or the Snowden chap uncover any of this in their thousands of leaked documents.
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 21 seconds ago
comment by Jay - Joint Ballon d'Ork winner 2013. (U16498)
posted 31 seconds ago
Admin is correct, again - lots of innocuous things cause explosions. Even in an office, there are many, many things that can go boom.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've got an air duster for my keyboard that could do some damage. I also use it for taking dents out cars.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Careful Admin, those things are dangerous I used mine for getting a free home redecoration.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
What about another conspiracy theory. That the CIA flooded crack cocaine into poor black neighbourhoods in the 80's to destroy whole communities.
Anyone believe that?
The point is admin,the planet is run by crazed madmen who see ordinary people as pawns to sacrifice in their pursuits of self gain,money and power and we just take all the spoon feeding they can supply and told not to question.
When we do we're all conspiracy nut jobs.
We have mp's via the media telling the lower classes,there all lazy and deserve poverty and a life of c rap while they plunder the expenses at the tax payers cost,yes ordinary regular chaps like you and i.
The hypocrisy is breathtaking.
By the way, the death of Frank Olson is one case where it seems much more of a leap of imagination to conclude there was no foul play. Worth reading up on. The names Donald Rumsfeld and Cheney crop up a lot in the literature around that - they were lower grade insiders around the White House in the 70s and heavily involved in proving there was nothing to see. They worked their way to the top on the background of a very grimy period in the recent history of skulduggery (dirty wars / proxy wars / arms to contras / Watergate). They were the key foreign policy players in W's administration. They without doubt exploited 9/11 as a springboard for plans that predated it. For that reason I'm kind of open-minded about theories that there was some kind of state involvement or facilitation. Either way, what followed 9/11 is plenty enough to indict them in history.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 50 seconds ago
Say you were an agency planning it. You would be able to, years in advance, get the plans of the building, the construction materials and associated properties of the materials, and then run 1000s of simulations identifying inherent weaknesses in the structure and architecture.
..................
Come up with a ball park figure of how many, and who, would have to be 'in the know', to be able to pull this off.
Was any of these conspiracies uncovered by recent whistle blowing, out of interest?
Did Bradley Manning or the Snowden chap uncover any of this in their thousands of leaked documents.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I very much doubt anything on this scale would be 'filed' in the same areas where the lesser scandals are.
Once worked in a building that had loads of Nato restricted stuff.
Despite the security at the gate, someone managed to get their car stereo nicked from the car park and someone else who had forgot their entrance pass managed to flash a slice of toast to the guards to get into the building.
Admin is correct, again - lots of innocuous things cause explosions. Even in an office, there are many, many things that can go boom.
----------
of course there is, but im sure those who heard them over the hysteria that was going on would have known the difference between a can of lynx and some other kind of big explosion.
it may have been caused by something as simple as gas.
Either way, what followed 9/11 is plenty enough to indict them in history.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly what i'm saying.
Yes rob,see a requim for detroit.
Governments s hit on us from a great height,watch us roll around in it fighting to get out,while they sit off in a lofty perch saying "thats entertainment"!
Sign in if you want to comment
Kennedy assassination- Conspiracy or not?
Page 11 of 28
12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16
posted on 14/11/13
comment by Kung Fu Cantona (U18082)
posted 1 minute ago
For a buildiong that size, yes you would.
Especially for a controlled explosion.
I wonder why none of the witnesses claimed to hear a bloody loud set of bangs that go with explosives being let off?
Silent explosion possibly?
-----------------------
They did actually.
just do a quick search on youtube.
Fireman heard explosives going off and so did the janitor who was all over the media swearing blind he heard explosives going off.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So 2, people, out of the hundreds/thousands?
-----------------------
wow
Do you really think I only listed 2 because there were only 2 or do you think I just gave you 2 because it would make no sense listing every single person who heard explosives going off?
Use your brain.
posted on 14/11/13
hairspray!!
is your mrs 75 admin
posted on 14/11/13
comment by Jay - Joint Ballon d'Ork winner 2013. (U16498) posted 9 minutes ago
Those types of buildings are never empty though - although I guess you could fix the employment of security guards to get your own men in position. Someone would likely have noticed, and it would have taken a while to set up
===
That would make a great plot for a film....
As I came up with the idea Brad Pitt will play me and Ed Norton can play you
posted on 14/11/13
The lazy comments from some people on here shows why governments can get away with so much.
The funny thing is whether or not 9/11 was a conspiracy, the events that followed should be as clear as day for anyone on here just how corrupt the US and UK governments have been in their foreign policies.
Half a million plus people were killed in Iraq as a result of the lies our goverments told us and certain people and companies became very rich off of that.
So by all means, use the lazy 'tin foil hat' brush off but i'd rather wear a tin foil hat than stick my head in the ground and pretend nothing shady goes on.
posted on 14/11/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 14/11/13
comment by Dunc the d'Ork - Proud co winner of the Ballon d'Ork 2013. (U11713)
posted 7 seconds ago
hairspray!!
is your mrs 75 admin
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm sure she has hairspray, I was using that as an example.
posted on 14/11/13
KFC
Do you think there is a possibility that the US flew those planes inro their own buildings?
posted on 14/11/13
Admin is correct, again - lots of innocuous things cause explosions. Even in an office, there are many, many things that can go boom.
posted on 14/11/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 14/11/13
Macca
please dont call him KFC, it doesnt sound right
posted on 14/11/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 14/11/13
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Jay - Joint Ballon d'Ork winner 2013. (U16498) posted 9 minutes ago
Those types of buildings are never empty though - although I guess you could fix the employment of security guards to get your own men in position. Someone would likely have noticed, and it would have taken a while to set up
===
That would make a great plot for a film....
As I came up with the idea Brad Pitt will play me and Ed Norton can play you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It sounds a bit like the plot to Ocean's 11 & 13
posted on 14/11/13
comment by Jay - Joint Ballon d'Ork winner 2013. (U16498)
posted 31 seconds ago
Admin is correct, again - lots of innocuous things cause explosions. Even in an office, there are many, many things that can go boom.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've got an air duster for my keyboard that could do some damage. I also use it for taking dents out cars.
posted on 14/11/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 14/11/13
Say you were an agency planning it. You would be able to, years in advance, get the plans of the building, the construction materials and associated properties of the materials, and then run 1000s of simulations identifying inherent weaknesses in the structure and architecture.
..................
Come up with a ball park figure of how many, and who, would have to be 'in the know', to be able to pull this off.
Was any of these conspiracies uncovered by recent whistle blowing, out of interest?
Did Bradley Manning or the Snowden chap uncover any of this in their thousands of leaked documents.
posted on 14/11/13
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 21 seconds ago
comment by Jay - Joint Ballon d'Ork winner 2013. (U16498)
posted 31 seconds ago
Admin is correct, again - lots of innocuous things cause explosions. Even in an office, there are many, many things that can go boom.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've got an air duster for my keyboard that could do some damage. I also use it for taking dents out cars.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Careful Admin, those things are dangerous I used mine for getting a free home redecoration.
posted on 14/11/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 14/11/13
What about another conspiracy theory. That the CIA flooded crack cocaine into poor black neighbourhoods in the 80's to destroy whole communities.
Anyone believe that?
posted on 14/11/13
The point is admin,the planet is run by crazed madmen who see ordinary people as pawns to sacrifice in their pursuits of self gain,money and power and we just take all the spoon feeding they can supply and told not to question.
When we do we're all conspiracy nut jobs.
We have mp's via the media telling the lower classes,there all lazy and deserve poverty and a life of c rap while they plunder the expenses at the tax payers cost,yes ordinary regular chaps like you and i.
The hypocrisy is breathtaking.
posted on 14/11/13
By the way, the death of Frank Olson is one case where it seems much more of a leap of imagination to conclude there was no foul play. Worth reading up on. The names Donald Rumsfeld and Cheney crop up a lot in the literature around that - they were lower grade insiders around the White House in the 70s and heavily involved in proving there was nothing to see. They worked their way to the top on the background of a very grimy period in the recent history of skulduggery (dirty wars / proxy wars / arms to contras / Watergate). They were the key foreign policy players in W's administration. They without doubt exploited 9/11 as a springboard for plans that predated it. For that reason I'm kind of open-minded about theories that there was some kind of state involvement or facilitation. Either way, what followed 9/11 is plenty enough to indict them in history.
posted on 14/11/13
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 50 seconds ago
Say you were an agency planning it. You would be able to, years in advance, get the plans of the building, the construction materials and associated properties of the materials, and then run 1000s of simulations identifying inherent weaknesses in the structure and architecture.
..................
Come up with a ball park figure of how many, and who, would have to be 'in the know', to be able to pull this off.
Was any of these conspiracies uncovered by recent whistle blowing, out of interest?
Did Bradley Manning or the Snowden chap uncover any of this in their thousands of leaked documents.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I very much doubt anything on this scale would be 'filed' in the same areas where the lesser scandals are.
posted on 14/11/13
Once worked in a building that had loads of Nato restricted stuff.
Despite the security at the gate, someone managed to get their car stereo nicked from the car park and someone else who had forgot their entrance pass managed to flash a slice of toast to the guards to get into the building.
posted on 14/11/13
Admin is correct, again - lots of innocuous things cause explosions. Even in an office, there are many, many things that can go boom.
----------
of course there is, but im sure those who heard them over the hysteria that was going on would have known the difference between a can of lynx and some other kind of big explosion.
it may have been caused by something as simple as gas.
posted on 14/11/13
Either way, what followed 9/11 is plenty enough to indict them in history.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly what i'm saying.
posted on 14/11/13
Yes rob,see a requim for detroit.
Governments s hit on us from a great height,watch us roll around in it fighting to get out,while they sit off in a lofty perch saying "thats entertainment"!
Page 11 of 28
12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16