everton

Lucas reckons our second goal should go down as a set piece.

Hmmm.

Bobody know the answer to that one then I see.

it must be everton...shawcross would have been proud of mirallas

I've seen numerous posts about the tackles Suarez did last season in the derby,yet the RS seem to skate around them.

I've seen numerous posts about the tackles Suarez did last season in the derby,yet the RS seem to skate around them.
skating round what alas?
if you think either of them tackles are in the same category as the mirallas one then you need your head seeing to

Lucas. If Suarez misses 5-6 matches after the challenge as Mirallas did with a foot injury you will be correct.

Still not guessed right anyone

Lucas. If Suarez misses 5-6 matches after the challenge as Mirallas did with a foot injury you will be correct.

why should the injury be the barometer to its seriousness? you really are dim arouna
still laughing at martinez grasping for any straw he could find in the interview with the gerrard comment, despite mirallas actually jumping into henderson with his arm and cutting him.

oh he was cut...does that equal 3 games??

Lucas. You are the dim one.

You believe that one was more dangerous etc than another. Well one forced a player off the pitch and to miss games....

Another year later and a horror tackle is so bad a player completes 90 minutes

You are a complete bitter clown.

disappointed in the RS, i was expecting better from them but they still get 10 men behind the ball and try to hit you on the break.

Lucas. You are the dim one.

You believe that one was more dangerous etc than another. Well one forced a player off the pitch and to miss games....

Another year later and a horror tackle is so bad a player completes 90 minutes

You are a complete bitter clown.

ok, so to be clear, the severity of a challenge is only down to the extent of the injury.
Lets get the FA to dish out punishment once the doctors have assessed it then arouna

its actually debatable whether suarez meant to make contact with mirallas last year and only the "slow motion" looks sinister.
the mirallas on suarez looks downright disgusting at any speed

its like talking to a flucking child with you

And lucas it is debatable if Mirallas went to 'get' suarez. Unless you can read his mind?


I can, he went for him and he deserved it. He would have walked if the RS physio had not chirped in the refs ear

But what a physio he is....saving suarezs leg from being amputated. In fact mirallas deserves credit as prior to that tap on his leg he wanted off

maybe its credit to suarez for not being an insult to his club and feigning injury for 6 weeks

Not sure how you fake damage shown on scans/xrays?

"He CAN play for Toffees: Mirallas injury fears fade for Everton
29 October 2012 10:30 PM By David Maddock
Initial concern the forward faced weeks out after Suarez's tackle ease as a scan reveals he could even be ready for Saturday's trip to Fulham
Scantastic! Medical tests brought good news for Mirallas
Everton's fears for Kevin Mirallas have been eased after a scan revealed his Merseyside Derby injury is not as severe as first thought.

The Belgian forward was outstanding in the first half of Sunday's 2-2 draw with Liverpool, but limped out of the game at the interval after a tackle from Luis Suarez left him unable to continue."

Did he make the Fulham match?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/20107627

There he is playing on the 3rd Nov against Fulham. That's a short 6 weeks.

comment by red_man23 - Will be doing plenty of gardening from May . (U1669)

==

The six weeks was for a hamstring injury.

But I am glad you are not obsessed about the challenge

Me obsessed. Na not quite. Just providing a valuable service. You bitters have peddled this myth so much you believe it's true. You're still spouting it now;

"Lucas. If Suarez misses 5-6 matches after the challenge as Mirallas did with a foot injury you will be correct."

Mirallas played in the following match. He didn't 'miss 5/6 games with a foot injury' due to Suarez's tackle.

Glad to be of help.

And lucas it is debatable if Mirallas went to 'get' suarez. Unless you can read his mind?

Fook me,Lucas has some strings to his bow. I've already posted today that he must be a clairvoyant,and now he's telepathic.

And lucas it is debatable if Mirallas went to 'get' suarez. Unless you can read his mind?

Fook me,Lucas has some strings to his bow. I've already posted today that he must be a clairvoyant,and now he's telepathic.

where did i say he deliberately set out to "get him"?

comment by lucas leiva really is that good! (U9282)
posted 1 hour, 3 minutes ago
maybe its credit to suarez for not being an insult to his club and feigning injury for 6 weeks
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lol suarez not an insult to liverpool football club. Thats proper funny that. Was being banned for racist insults or being banned for biting or trying to force a move to another english club an insult to lfc?

where did i say he deliberately set out to "get him

You posted that Suarez's tackle on Distin and Mirallas didn't deserve a yellow because they weren't deliberate. Come on Lucas you can't have it both ways.

dont know about you alas, but the natural movement of the foot is to go towards the ground...not towards the back of somebody's knee

I think we can all say ( well for me anyway) kevin should have been sent of yesterday. I though that while at the match & seeing replays has not changed my mind. I do find it amazing how many lovable reds seem to think it was the worst tackle EVER

Are you now saying that an unintentional foul can relieve a yellow? You posted on another thread that Suarez didn't deserve a yellow because the fouls he committed weren't deliberate.

It was a bad tackle I'm just gutted it wasn't on his standing leg.