lol thats class! If this was done to prove that woodcock wasnt top notch just because he knocked out 25 opponents in a row, his ability made him british and european champion where your man is the champion of yemen! Your not telling me there was no one decent in europe back then are you D4?

Not exactly, though your thread did remind of this boxer, I also have a subliminal pop at Mayweather

Ali Raymi is taking on his toughest challenge yet next fight another unbeaten fighter with 43 win and 36 KOs.

He is currently ranked 11th in the world.

Only started boxing in his 30s I think

Yes but I still think if you can Ko 20 straight opponents in the first round you must be a very big hitter whatever the level, he could be anything as tyson would of not been able to beat that record against the same opponents! Ill be interested to see how he would get on against an english fringe fighter!

England has no decent fighters at that weight

The guy he is fighting next is an ex world champion all be it WBF. But he been retired for 10 years

paul butler! I reckon the fight in question will be rigged!

pmsl heres one of his fights, the reason he has had 20 1st round kos in a row is because under no circumstances are his opponents to throw a punch, must be yemen rules!!

http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=37004&cat=boxer

sorry here it is!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgoewXb8koc

Howard Foster stops that in the first 10 seconds

so good that he made his debut 5 times...

I hope thats a joke matt lol

The guy is a well known joke around the boxing forums,

Fighters should not be judged on their record but on who they have beat and how, and who they have not fought.

but if bolt ran against me d4 united kaz and mattyp 20 times and beat us all by country mile over 100m would you say he was a joke or would you say 'he is obviously good but how good, we will only find that out if he fights someone with names on his record!!'

The guy always has his cousins as judges

to be fair he dont really need judges!

Not a great analogy because the times would give away the talent.

A better example would be thinking Celtic are a great football team if they never played in Europe against the elite, and just played in the SPL beating teams every week 5-0

I hope ur nt being serious d4 but with u u never know

thats fair enough d4, difference is celtic have been tested against the best in europe and have at times looked wanting, what im saying is this boxer hasnt, so we dont no how good he could be! He has done all he can with whats infront of him, 1st round kos in every fight!

We should only rate people on what they have done, not what they might have done.

Beating one tomato can or 20 make no difference, the best you have done is beat a tomato can.

I think where losing the point here, im not saying he is a world champ in waiting, what I am saying is you cant say he isnt because he has kmocked over every tomato can in waiting in the 1st round, you cant do anymore than that no matter how bad the opponents! One thing is for sure, he can hit and thats half the battle! I no at 40 its unlikely we will find out now but it would of been interesting if he had got ambitious and fought in europe, but we will probably never find out now!

Do u have footage of him btw, Freddy flintoff is 1-0 aswell

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgoewXb8koc

that's earily frightning! the other poor guy looks like he could drop at any time due to starvation

its looks like a fight me and my mate used to have as kids, no heads shots just hammer the body