Fredericks showed more promise in 20 minutes than Naughton has in his entire career at Spurs. He simply isn't good enough in my opinion.
Don't get ahead of yourself here, remember Naughton's debut for us in a friendly, he looked more deadly then Fredericks did.
Naughton is much a more reliable back up, ridiculous to suggest otherwise
I've seen nothing from Naughton in the past year and a half. Just my opinion, but I don't rate him at all.
Naughton is decent enough defensively but offers very little going forward. I suspect with Fredericks its the other way around
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Sometimes I wonder what people see. Naughton never let us down? He got out muscled for Anzhis only go when playing in his favoured right back role and last week he allowed the Sunderland right winger acres of space to cross that ball in when they scored. In fact I remember the Sunderland played taking an extra touch before whipping that ball in and naughton still wasn't close. He's not good enough for back up neither of you ask me. Bring Benny back for back up
He's mediocre at best, thankfully Walker's form has improved since the start of the season and Rose is back.. new LB is a must in January imo.
Cheeky move for Evra if Moyes goes back for Baines?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
I thought Naughton looked very average for Norwich, both Rose and Caulker had far more impressive loan spells.
absolutely ridiculous.
naughton is an established premier league quality player, which he proved at norwich, and is good right back back up for us.
fredericks has had one half of football against a joke outfit, and people are saying he is ahead of naughton in the pecking order?
i mean he may well be the better player eventually, but lets not pretend he is even a quarter as proven as naughton is at the top level, and i can promise you that i am not really a naughton fan!
Fredericks performance has put himself out there, expect him to go out on loan in January
Naughton was meant to be our big signing Out of the 2 and looks like a cheap failed punt. Haven't seen enough of Freddricks to judge
Why everytime a player plays well or looks alright we have to write of another player?
Bit crazy to suggest that. Fredericks is a converted right back in his first season as a right back.
Give him time his positioning and tackling abilities are rubbish at the moment.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Who's better Naughton or Fredericks??
Page 1 of 1
posted on 13/12/13
Fredericks showed more promise in 20 minutes than Naughton has in his entire career at Spurs. He simply isn't good enough in my opinion.
posted on 13/12/13
Don't get ahead of yourself here, remember Naughton's debut for us in a friendly, he looked more deadly then Fredericks did.
posted on 13/12/13
Naughton is much a more reliable back up, ridiculous to suggest otherwise
posted on 13/12/13
I've seen nothing from Naughton in the past year and a half. Just my opinion, but I don't rate him at all.
posted on 13/12/13
Naughton is decent enough defensively but offers very little going forward. I suspect with Fredericks its the other way around
posted on 13/12/13
Sagna
posted on 13/12/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 13/12/13
Sometimes I wonder what people see. Naughton never let us down? He got out muscled for Anzhis only go when playing in his favoured right back role and last week he allowed the Sunderland right winger acres of space to cross that ball in when they scored. In fact I remember the Sunderland played taking an extra touch before whipping that ball in and naughton still wasn't close. He's not good enough for back up neither of you ask me. Bring Benny back for back up
posted on 13/12/13
Goal*
posted on 13/12/13
He's mediocre at best, thankfully Walker's form has improved since the start of the season and Rose is back.. new LB is a must in January imo.
Cheeky move for Evra if Moyes goes back for Baines?
posted on 14/12/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 14/12/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 14/12/13
I thought Naughton looked very average for Norwich, both Rose and Caulker had far more impressive loan spells.
posted on 14/12/13
absolutely ridiculous.
naughton is an established premier league quality player, which he proved at norwich, and is good right back back up for us.
fredericks has had one half of football against a joke outfit, and people are saying he is ahead of naughton in the pecking order?
i mean he may well be the better player eventually, but lets not pretend he is even a quarter as proven as naughton is at the top level, and i can promise you that i am not really a naughton fan!
posted on 14/12/13
Fredericks performance has put himself out there, expect him to go out on loan in January
posted on 14/12/13
Naughton was meant to be our big signing Out of the 2 and looks like a cheap failed punt. Haven't seen enough of Freddricks to judge
posted on 14/12/13
Why everytime a player plays well or looks alright we have to write of another player?
posted on 14/12/13
Bit crazy to suggest that. Fredericks is a converted right back in his first season as a right back.
Give him time his positioning and tackling abilities are rubbish at the moment.
Page 1 of 1