we don't have the depth to last
but it is fun to watch us play and the results haven't been too shabby
As I said January is a month where u can add that depth
we can't really attract the players we need without CL football
we tried last summer and they all turned us down
catch 22
Is it me your looking for....
i can see it in your eyes.......
http://www.funnyordie.com/pictures/160ff0723f/missing-lionel-richie-found-amazing-street-flier
comment by TheKaisersTrainers Love FSG (U5676)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
we can't really attract the players we need without CL football
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Falcao (to Athletico Madrid) and Suarez are the main example's that their it's still possible, although hard.
To be honest we are going to need the referees to improve if we are to be in with a chance of challenging.
We can't afford for them to be taking 6 points off us against the other contenders and still have a chance.
Robert, you got two draws against us, last season due to poor ref decision's.
Anyway, didn't Coutinho's goal at Eastlands come near enough straight after that controversial disallowed goal?
"you got two draws against us, last season due to poor ref decision's."
No we didn't.
"didn't Coutinho's goal at Eastlands come near enough straight after that controversial disallowed goal"
No, not straight after it.
Not that it makes any difference if it was 2 minutes or 20 minutes, the point is it's the difference between being 1 up and being 2 up.
"No we didn't."
Suarez pushed Ramires in the first game to level.
And in Anfield, Suarez and Sturridge should have been sent off, and they go on to score and assist the equalizer that came AFTER the whistle was blown.
I wasn't too bothered about the first game, sometimes you get them sometimes you don't, but the Anfield match was the angriest i have been since Barcelona in 2009.
*After the whistle should have been blown
I wish 606 had an option to edit comments
"Suarez pushed Ramires in the first game to level.
And in Anfield, Suarez and Sturridge should have been sent off, and they go on to score and assist the equalizer that came AFTER the whistle was blown."
Save your nonsense for those stupid enough to believe it.
So you are seriously telling me Suarez and Sturridge should have stayed on the pitch?
Or your goal didn't come AFTER the allotted added on time?
Look forward to Oscar making the faces off the Kop drop again in April
Whatever sunshine.
You can huff and puff and try and deflect away from what happened all you like but it's not working.
The ref gave you the game yesterday, you know it I know and everyone knows it. .........End of.
So you are not explaining why you didn't get given the draw at Anfield?
You are one massive hypocrite aren't you? im guessing you are a member on RAWK?
"The ref gave you the game yesterday, you know it I know and everyone knows it. .........End of."
even the mancs were saying it
and they'd rather stick red hot forks in their eyes than say something in favour of Liverpool
Its not allotted time its, a MINIMUM of additional time.
Not just 3 minutes added, that is the bare minimum the ref can add on 10 if he sees fit.
comment by Savarok (U7106)
posted 8 minutes ago
Its not allotted time its, a MINIMUM of additional time.
Not just 3 minutes added, that is the bare minimum the ref can add on 10 if he sees fit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So what about 2 players who should have been in early showers combining to score?
the ref can call the match over at 2 and a half minutes even if the other official puts 3 mins on the board
I don't know where this 'minimum' fiction originates from (even if a rule says otherwise)
When the ref blows the whistle the match is over. End of story.
Don't bother Kings Road, you really can't reason with some scousers on here. That Paisley t1t is an angrier, cuuntier version of Got Better.
safe to say Suarez definitely deserved to go last year, but I honestly can't remember what Sturridge did?
TKT. I don't agree with regard to players not coming to us because of no CL football. I am sure that many such players will have seen us rise over the past twelve months to the quality of what we produce now. In other words, onwards and upwards. There's no need for drastic changes in our squad such as is needed in both ManU and Chelsea. Please do not be surprised when we get new players in. Despite all of the comments made by fellow Reds above, all well intended, we are still on the move. definitely upwards.
JimmyTheRed
Sign in if you want to comment
Hello
Page 1 of 2
posted on 30/12/13
we don't have the depth to last
but it is fun to watch us play and the results haven't been too shabby
posted on 30/12/13
As I said January is a month where u can add that depth
posted on 30/12/13
we can't really attract the players we need without CL football
we tried last summer and they all turned us down
catch 22
posted on 30/12/13
Is it me your looking for....
posted on 30/12/13
Are you a "busby boy"?
posted on 30/12/13
i can see it in your eyes.......
posted on 30/12/13
http://www.funnyordie.com/pictures/160ff0723f/missing-lionel-richie-found-amazing-street-flier
posted on 30/12/13
Hahaha that's class
posted on 30/12/13
comment by TheKaisersTrainers Love FSG (U5676)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
we can't really attract the players we need without CL football
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Falcao (to Athletico Madrid) and Suarez are the main example's that their it's still possible, although hard.
posted on 30/12/13
To be honest we are going to need the referees to improve if we are to be in with a chance of challenging.
We can't afford for them to be taking 6 points off us against the other contenders and still have a chance.
posted on 30/12/13
Robert, you got two draws against us, last season due to poor ref decision's.
Anyway, didn't Coutinho's goal at Eastlands come near enough straight after that controversial disallowed goal?
posted on 30/12/13
"you got two draws against us, last season due to poor ref decision's."
No we didn't.
"didn't Coutinho's goal at Eastlands come near enough straight after that controversial disallowed goal"
No, not straight after it.
Not that it makes any difference if it was 2 minutes or 20 minutes, the point is it's the difference between being 1 up and being 2 up.
posted on 30/12/13
"No we didn't."
Suarez pushed Ramires in the first game to level.
And in Anfield, Suarez and Sturridge should have been sent off, and they go on to score and assist the equalizer that came AFTER the whistle was blown.
I wasn't too bothered about the first game, sometimes you get them sometimes you don't, but the Anfield match was the angriest i have been since Barcelona in 2009.
posted on 30/12/13
*After the whistle should have been blown
I wish 606 had an option to edit comments
posted on 30/12/13
"Suarez pushed Ramires in the first game to level.
And in Anfield, Suarez and Sturridge should have been sent off, and they go on to score and assist the equalizer that came AFTER the whistle was blown."
Save your nonsense for those stupid enough to believe it.
posted on 30/12/13
So you are seriously telling me Suarez and Sturridge should have stayed on the pitch?
Or your goal didn't come AFTER the allotted added on time?
Look forward to Oscar making the faces off the Kop drop again in April
posted on 30/12/13
Whatever sunshine.
You can huff and puff and try and deflect away from what happened all you like but it's not working.
The ref gave you the game yesterday, you know it I know and everyone knows it. .........End of.
posted on 30/12/13
So you are not explaining why you didn't get given the draw at Anfield?
You are one massive hypocrite aren't you? im guessing you are a member on RAWK?
posted on 30/12/13
"The ref gave you the game yesterday, you know it I know and everyone knows it. .........End of."
even the mancs were saying it
and they'd rather stick red hot forks in their eyes than say something in favour of Liverpool
posted on 31/12/13
Its not allotted time its, a MINIMUM of additional time.
Not just 3 minutes added, that is the bare minimum the ref can add on 10 if he sees fit.
posted on 31/12/13
comment by Savarok (U7106)
posted 8 minutes ago
Its not allotted time its, a MINIMUM of additional time.
Not just 3 minutes added, that is the bare minimum the ref can add on 10 if he sees fit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So what about 2 players who should have been in early showers combining to score?
posted on 31/12/13
the ref can call the match over at 2 and a half minutes even if the other official puts 3 mins on the board
I don't know where this 'minimum' fiction originates from (even if a rule says otherwise)
When the ref blows the whistle the match is over. End of story.
posted on 31/12/13
Don't bother Kings Road, you really can't reason with some scousers on here. That Paisley t1t is an angrier, cuuntier version of Got Better.
posted on 31/12/13
safe to say Suarez definitely deserved to go last year, but I honestly can't remember what Sturridge did?
posted on 31/12/13
TKT. I don't agree with regard to players not coming to us because of no CL football. I am sure that many such players will have seen us rise over the past twelve months to the quality of what we produce now. In other words, onwards and upwards. There's no need for drastic changes in our squad such as is needed in both ManU and Chelsea. Please do not be surprised when we get new players in. Despite all of the comments made by fellow Reds above, all well intended, we are still on the move. definitely upwards.
JimmyTheRed
Page 1 of 2