Hang the cant

I say let him play v Spurs every week.

He targets people with good teeth

lets build a bonfire in the middle of one of the pitches on tottenham marshes and burn him as haf time entertainment during one of the sunday league matches next weekend

He thinks he is so hard, he wears his wifes thong back to front instead of a jock strap.
If he had a brain he would be more dangerous than he is currently.

"I just have one thing to say: let's have less Charlie Adam and more money for public schools."

He doesn't even have a proper sir name the caant!!

comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)

posted 5 minutes ago

I say let him play v Spurs every week.
------------------------

Only if Shawcross can line up against your mob every week

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

shoot the caaant.

The reason all your insurances (from commercial to consumer) are so high in the UK, is because of the money the insurers have to set aside every year in case the following occurs :

Spurs play an away game where Adam is in the home side and Agent Webb is ref.

D'jeesuz, well I hope shawcross breaks that little f. Uck er Ramseys legs again. See we can all be nasty c. Unts like you.

Disgusting comment, DJ.

here comes shawcrosss….. there goes ramseys leg

Spurs are considering making a complaint to the FA re Adams. Email Spurs and the FA insisting action is taken. I enjoy 606 but moaning about it here will stay here. Spurs SHOULD lodge a complaint against Stoke, Mark Hughes and Charlie Adams. Hughes clearly sent the thug on to hurt our most significant player on the day and Friend didn't show a yellow card so we must assume he has missed it making this a text book case of why the FA has adopted post match disciplinary reviews.

comment by Chronic (U3423)
posted 13 minutes ago
here comes shawcrosss….. there goes ramseys leg
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I just read the independent panel has reviewed the Charlie Adam tackle and decided it was not a red card offence. So Adam is free to maim again. Middle finger the crowd get a 2 match ban. Severely damage a mans ankle ligaments, nothing. Match referee admits he didn't see it so he either had his eyes closed or more likely was following the play. How an independent committee not think this was a late rash tackle resulting in a serious injury and not worthy of a red beats me. Well done independent, paid for by the FA committee. Was it because Paulinho didn't do a dying swan? Were they somehow swayed by Stokes two reds in the previous match? Were they post rationalising on Hughes earlier penalty claim? Even gooner mates are saying it should have been straight red ffs!

I think he's still very bitter that his dream move to Tottenhamm never happened.

comment by ShortBack&Sides (U17757)
posted 18 minutes ago
I just read the independent panel has reviewed the Charlie Adam tackle and decided it was not a red card offence

---

is this a joke? it was a horrible tackle

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Missed match of the day so I haven't seen the tackle, but it's not surprise - Adam is a , I remember that awful challenge on Bale a couple of seasons back. Poor tackling really need to be stamped out (no pun intended) those who say it ruins the game are idiots - a crackdown on poor tackling could lead to better quality defending and less injuries - there just need to be a similarly strong stance on simulation concurrently.

Ouch chronic